Jean-Marc Valin wrote:> The way the libogg check is actually not something that's under my > control. It's installed on the system as an autoconf .m4 file.Would you accept a patch that uses pkg-config (which has cross compiling support) if it falls back to the current method if pkg-config is not available? Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/
Erik de Castro Lopo a ?crit :>> The way the libogg check is actually not something that's under my >> control. It's installed on the system as an autoconf .m4 file. > > Would you accept a patch that uses pkg-config (which has cross > compiling support) if it falls back to the current method if > pkg-config is not available?Actually, I'm not sure how to do it, but I think the most useful would be a patch that still allows you to re-run autoconf/automake even without having libogg present. Right now, if you don't have libogg, you can't cleanly build from git. Jean-Marc
Jean-Marc Valin wrote:> Actually, I'm not sure how to do it, but I think the most useful would > be a patch that still allows you to re-run autoconf/automake even > without having libogg present. Right now, if you don't have libogg, you > can't cleanly build from git.I'll take a look over the weekend. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/