Dear Conrad and other people. First of all thank you for your nice response. On 7/4/07, Conrad Parker <conrad@metadecks.org> wrote:> On 04/07/07, Rog?rio Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br> wrote: > > Dear speex developers, > > > > Would it be possible to have tags in speex files? > > sure, Speex files use vorbis-style comments (ie. similar to Ogg Vorbis files).Thanks, that is nice, but you left me with a question: is it possible to have speex files in an ogg container? I looked a bit on the documentation of speexenc and could find no mention of it (I'm using Debian's testing distribution and the superb easytag as a tag manager).> speexenc --comment "MOOD=Happy" speech1234.wav speech1234.spxDoes this mean that, in case I wrap the file into an Ogg container, it will have two layers of "containment"? Thank you very much for your kind answer, Rog?rio Brito.
> Thanks, that is nice, but you left me with a question: is it possible > to have speex files in an ogg container? I looked a bit on the > documentation of speexenc and could find no mention of it (I'm using > Debian's testing distribution and the superb easytag as a tag > manager). > >> speexenc --comment "MOOD=Happy" speech1234.wav speech1234.spx > > Does this mean that, in case I wrap the file into an Ogg container, it > will have two layers of "containment"?speexenc *already* puts the Speex data in an Ogg container. I tend to call those files .spx, but they're still Ogg files. Jean-Marc
Dear Jean-Marc and Conrad, Sorry for the lack of responses from my part, but life has been quite stressful right now. On 2007-07-06, at 03:45, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:>> Thanks, that is nice, but you left me with a question: is it possible >> to have speex files in an ogg container? I looked a bit on the >> documentation of speexenc and could find no mention of it (I'm using >> Debian's testing distribution and the superb easytag as a tag >> manager).Now, easytag recognizes the Speex files as a type of file to be edited.>> Does this mean that, in case I wrap the file into an Ogg >> container, it >> will have two layers of "containment"? > > speexenc *already* puts the Speex data in an Ogg container. I tend to > call those files .spx, but they're still Ogg files.Hummm, I didn't know that. I'm sorry if I missed that in the manpages. I am anyway, hoping that programs like Ekiga have support for ultra-wideband when sending the voice over IP. Oh, and a method for having one choose the quality/bitrate of the transmission. Anyway, I'm now encoding my lecture speeches with Speex. Thank you very much for developing the superb codec. Regards, Rog?rio Brito. -- Rog?rio Brito : rbrito@{mackenzie,ime.usp}.br : GPG key 1024D/7C2CAEB8 http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito : http://meusite.mackenzie.com.br/rbrito Projects: algorithms.berlios.de : lame.sf.net : vrms.alioth.debian.org