Speex dev - Feb 2007 - Integer Version with low bit rate for Linux Kernel?

Hello Erik,

 

The transfer time from user space to kernel and back is not a problem, it is
faster than required.

 

 
> Have you measured the time taken to transfer a data packet from kernel to 
> user space? Have you measured the time taken to encode that packet? What
> are those measurements?
 
> If you haven't performed those measurements, putting the Speex encoder
> in the kernel is probably a pointless exercise because I would be very
> surprised if the packet encoding time is less than 100 times greater 
> than the time to transfer the packet from kernel to user space.
 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20070201/b9707b3d/attachment.htm

MOENCH, EGON - PFHO wrote:
> Hello Erik,
> 
> The transfer time from user space to kernel and back is not a problem, it
is
> faster than required.
Does that mean that you have given up on the idea of putting a
Speex codec in ther kernel?

Erik
-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
  Erik de Castro Lopo
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"The problem with using C++ ... is that there's already a strong
tendency in the language to require you to know everything before
you can do anything." -- Larry Wall