Jean-Marc, So I saw in the latest code that the vad in the preprocessor is gone/going to be re-written. Is there a plan as far as this goes? Just wondering as the current one seems to work pretty well. Thanks! Tom ______________________________________________ Tom Harper Lead Software Engineer SightSpeed - <http://www.sightspeed.com/>http://www.sightspeed.com/ 918 Parker St, Suite A14 Berkeley, CA 94710 Email: tharper@sightspeed.com Phone: 510-665-2920 Fax: 510-649-9569 My SightSpeed Video Link: http://tom.sightspeed.com
> So I saw in the latest code that the vad in the preprocessor is > gone/going to be re-written. Is there a plan as far as this goes? > Just wondering as the current one seems to work pretty well.Wasn't too happy with it. I put back a quick VAD hack in the mean time. Let me know how good/bad it works. Jean-Marc> Thanks! > > Tom > > ______________________________________________ > > Tom Harper > Lead Software Engineer > SightSpeed - <http://www.sightspeed.com/>http://www.sightspeed.com/ > > 918 Parker St, Suite A14 > Berkeley, CA 94710 > > Email: tharper@sightspeed.com > Phone: 510-665-2920 > Fax: 510-649-9569 > My SightSpeed Video Link: http://tom.sightspeed.com > _______________________________________________ > Speex-dev mailing list > Speex-dev@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev > >
Jean-Marc Valin a ?crit :>> So I saw in the latest code that the vad in the preprocessor is >> gone/going to be re-written. Is there a plan as far as this goes? >> Just wondering as the current one seems to work pretty well. > > Wasn't too happy with it. I put back a quick VAD hack in the mean time. > Let me know how good/bad it works.Sorry, forgot to check it in. It's in svn now. Jean-Marc