Is there a way to tell during the NB decode if it was kicked off by the SB decode? I would like to avoid saturating and packing the output of the NB decode, only to unpack it for the SB. Thanks. -Fritz
Could you explain a bit more what your question is?
Jean-Marc
Selon Fritz Koenig <fkoenig@on2.com>:
> Is there a way to tell during the NB decode if it was kicked off by the
> SB decode? I would like to avoid saturating and packing the output of
> the NB decode, only to unpack it for the SB.
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Fritz
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev@xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>
>
Because a wideband signal has both a narrowband part and a wideband part the first part of the wideband decode is to call the narrowband decode. In the fixed point version the signal generated from the narrowband decode is downshifted at the end. In this same version the wideband then upshifts the signal by the same amount. I would like to do away with the downshift on the narrowband side and the upshift on the wideband side and just past the decoded signal through. To do this and allow for the decoding of narrowband only signals I need to detect who the calling function is to the narrowband decode. What I was wondering is if there was already a member variable that held the current decode state. -Fritz Jean-Marc Valin wrote:>Could you explain a bit more what your question is? > > Jean-Marc > >Selon Fritz Koenig <fkoenig@on2.com>: > > > >>Is there a way to tell during the NB decode if it was kicked off by the >>SB decode? I would like to avoid saturating and packing the output of >>the NB decode, only to unpack it for the SB. >> >>Thanks. >> >>-Fritz >>_______________________________________________ >>Speex-dev mailing list >>Speex-dev@xiph.org >>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev >> >> >> >> > > > > >