Speex dev - Aug 2004 - What is the format of the PCM/WAV dataforspeex_encode & speex_decode?

Ok, I'm using 1.1.4, so I should pass signed short(wav data) directly to
speex_encode()?

But the samplecode that comes with 1.1.4 shows me to put short in float
array, and pass the float array to speex_encode()

<p>-----Original Message-----
From: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-speex-dev@xiph.org] On Behalf
Of Jean-Marc Valin
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 6:25 AM
To: speex
Subject: Re: [speex-dev] What is the format of the PCM/WAV data
forspeex_encode & speex_decode?

Speex 1.0.3 uses floats, but the unstable version 1.1.x uses short.

        Jean-Marc

<p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'speex-dev-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.

Le ven 16/04/2004 à 16:39, Kenji Chan a écrit :
> Ok, I'm using 1.1.4, so I should pass signed short(wav data) directly
to
> speex_encode()?
First, I'd like to ak why you want to use 1.1.4. If you don't need the
new features (fixed-point or preprocessor), you should probably stick to
1.0.3, which has received more testing. If you choose to use 1.1.4, you
need to send shorts to speex_encode/speex_decode.
> But the samplecode that comes with 1.1.4 shows me to put short in float
> array, and pass the float array to speex_encode()
The document hasn't been updated for 1.1.x.

        Jean-Marc


-- 
Jean-Marc Valin
http://www.xiph.org/~jm/
LABORIUS
Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée.
Url :
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20040416/e90e7b67/signature-0001.pgp

I thought it would be more update/better/faster, any thing wrong?
In the future, would you use short, and forget about float?
If so, I use 1.1.4, I wouldn't need to change my code in the future, right?

You said, it's unstable, yes, I got compiling errors with MsVC6 and MsVC.net
And I modified it a bit to get it compiled. Should I post the errors here?

<p>-----Original Message-----
From: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-speex-dev@xiph.org] On Behalf
Of Jean-Marc Valin
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 6:42 AM
To: speex
Subject: RE: [speex-dev] What is the format of the PCM/WAV
dataforspeex_encode & speex_decode?

Le ven 16/04/2004 à 16:39, Kenji Chan a écrit :
> Ok, I'm using 1.1.4, so I should pass signed short(wav data) directly
to
> speex_encode()?
First, I'd like to ak why you want to use 1.1.4. If you don't need the
new features (fixed-point or preprocessor), you should probably stick to
1.0.3, which has received more testing. If you choose to use 1.1.4, you
need to send shorts to speex_encode/speex_decode.

<p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'speex-dev-request@xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is
needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.