Ok, I uploaded that tool including sources onto my site (darkav.de.vu). bye, D A --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
> Low bitrate was the design goal, not Netmeeting compatibility ;)Ok, I understand your target, which absolutely makes sense. Do you think it would be possible to make additional profiles for netmeeting compatibility, even if bitrate would be a bit higher. Nevertheless even current situation is more than satisfying as now I can enjoy voip woth better quality than phone. :-) Thanx for your ACM interface, and thanx to jmvalin (?) for the speex codec. :-) D A --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
Christian Buchner
2004-Aug-06 15:01 UTC
[speex-dev] @Christian Buchner: speex acm & netmeeting
> Nice to hear! Do sou think you will be able to make the other modes also > compatible? But I guess these working modes are already OK for > netmeeting. I will try the Q4 16kHz mode today.Low bitrate was the design goal, not Netmeeting compatibility ;) Padding loss occurs because Speex encodes frames that do not end on byte boundaries. If you force each Speex frame to be byte aligned you get significant padding loss (up to 7 unused bits per frame). And that is bad because it drives your bitrate up. I used a C program to determine good bit packing for each mode. This was able to ensure that bit padding loss is less than 1/1000th of the total bitrate for all available modes in the codec. In some low quality modes I was able to save 10% in bitrate. This came at a price though. Grouping several speex frames into one block makes it more difficult to use the ACM for low latency applications like Netmeeting. So if the ACM combines 8 Speex frames into a block (or packet) then you need to encode these 8 frames before you can send off the packet. Each frame has 20 ms duration, so you have to wait 160 ms before you can encode a packet and send it off. 320 ms roundtrip delay is bad for a phone conversation - especially in a heavy argument! ;) Netmeeting may be unable to buffer enough samples to begin encoding of such a long packet (limited sample buffers). That may be why you received invalid/garbled data when you first tried that. It may be worthwile to try the higher quality modes also (those which pack 2 frames into a packet). Netmeeting may be able to handle that just fine. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.