Displaying 20 results from an estimated 80 matches similar to: "Problem with PVCM: "0 (non-NA) cases""
2010 Feb 25
2
error using pvcm() on unbalanced panel data
Dear all
I am trying to fit Variable Coefficients Models on Unbalanced Panel
Data. I managed to fit such models on balanced panel data (the example
from the "plm" vignette), but I failed to do so on my real, unbalanced
panel data.
I can reproduce the error on a modified example from the vignette:
> require(plm)
> data("Hedonic")
> Hed <- pvcm(mv ~ crim + zn + indus
2012 Jan 18
1
Problems with Panel Data estimation
Hi everybody,
Got some doubts here. I'm kinda desperate for help, so please ask me if
anything isn't clear.
I have a database with this structure (panel data structure):
> head(dados_2)
Tempo Safra Data Resposta Perc_Resg_Acum Alta_Temporada Flexi Promo
1 1 1 200701 0.04223216 0 1 0 0
2 1 2 200702 0.02801536 0
2013 Feb 26
2
Count function calls
Dear R-users,
I have the following problem: I am running the function 'pvcm' from the 'plm' Panel Data package. Inside this function 'solve' is called and gives for a certain individual data series an exception because of singularity. I would like to know which individual data series causes this error. I tried to debug it, but this is truly painful, as solve is called
2012 Mar 08
1
Panel models: Fixed effects & random coefficients in plm
Hello,
I am using {plm} to estimate panel models. I want to estimate a model that
includes fixed effects for time and individual, but has a random individual
effect for the coefficient on the independent variable.
That is, I would like to estimate the model:
Y_it = a_i + a_t + B_i * X_it + e_it
Where i denotes individuals, t denotes time, X is my independent variable,
and B (beta) is the
2010 Jul 01
0
coefficients poolability (was: question regarding panel data analysis)
Hello.
Not an easy question at all, and it has little to do with software,
alas!
Veeeeeery loosely speaking: if the homogeneity hypothesis is rejected,
then, depending on data availability, you may still be able to treat the
data like a panel by:
a) ignoring the results of the poolability test
b) allowing the coefficients to vary.
Of course, a) requires some courage while b) requires more
2011 Feb 09
0
test proportion
Hi all,
I have a hypothesis test of proportion question without using R. I hope you
could help to answer my question.
Here is the statement.
*********************
Preliminary data from a feasibility study showed a potential failure level
of 1%. A sample size was calculated to detect a potential shift from this 1%
level to a 2.5%, at an alpha level of 0.025 and beta of 0.1. The sample size
2010 Aug 09
0
PCA analysis, presence-absence of mammals in parks
Hi everyone,
So I am trying to see which ecological parameter of different parks in nyc
influence the most the diversity of the medium-sized mammals in those parks.
I have a bunch of different parameters for each park I'm done studying and
the presence (1) and absence (0) of each mammal. I wanted to do a principal
component analysis of those data to know which ones of those parameters are
the
2009 Jul 23
1
Help with Loop!
Dear experts,
I'm new in R and trying to learn by writing a version of the Perceptron
Algorithm. How can I tell in the code below to stop the iteration when the
condition in the "for loop" is not satisfied for all training examples?
Thanks in advance for your help!
## Generate a linearly separable data set in R2
sample <- as.data.frame(cbind(runif(n=100),runif(n=100)))
2010 Feb 03
1
Package plm & heterogenous slopes
Dear r-helpers,
I am working with plm package. I am trying to fit a fixed effects (or
a 'within') model of the form
y_it = a_i + b_i*t + e_it, i.e. a model with an individual-specific
intercept and an individual-
specific slope.
Does plm support this directly?
Thanks in advance!
Otto Kassi
2000 Jun 07
1
forward stepwise selection
Dear R-Help,
My problem/bug came to light,when fitting a linear model using stepwise
selection. I'd started with the straightfoward command
step(lm(y~., dataset))
This worked fine, but because this starts with all the possible
explanatory variables, it results in a model with too many explanatory
variables. Hence I wanted to start with just a constant and do forward
selection, to get a
2012 Jul 27
2
producing a graph with glm poisson distributed respons count data and categorical independant variables
Hello,
I am working on my thesis and can't really figure out how to produce a
reasonable graph from the output from my glm.,
I could just give the R-output in my results and then discuss them, but it
would be more interesting if I could visualise what is going on.
My research is how bees react to different fieldmargins, for this I have 4
different types of field margin (A,B,C & D) and
2009 Mar 15
1
Bug Report Fwd: MANOVA Data (PR#13595)
Hi.? There appears to be a bug in R function manova.? My friend and I both ran it the same way as shown below (his run) with the shown data set. His results are shown below. we both got the same results.? I was running with R 2.3.1. I'm not sure what version he used.
Thanks very much,
David Booth
Kent State University
-----Original Message-----
From: dvdbooth at cs.com
To: kberk at
2010 Jun 08
3
more dates and data frames
Dear R People:
So thanks to your help, I have the following:
> dog3.df <- read.delim("c:/Users/erin/Documents/dog1.txt",header=FALSE,sep="\t")
> dog3.df
V1 V2
1 1/1/2000 dog
2 1/1/2000 cat
3 1/1/2000 tree
4 1/1/2000 dog
5 1/2/2000 cat
6 1/2/2000 cat
7 1/2/2000 cat
8 1/2/2000 tree
9 1/3/2000 dog
10 1/3/2000 tree
11 1/6/2000 dog
12 1/6/2000
2008 Oct 31
6
[LLVMdev] polyhedron 2005 results for llvm svn
I am finding with the patch that all of the Polyhedron 2005
benchmarks pass on i686-apple-darwin9. Could someone clarify the
regression rules for releases? Not building a secondary language
on a primary target is usually considered a P1 regression for
FSF gcc. Not doing so here gives one the impression that llvm.org
isn't playing by the same rules. No one is ever going to want to
use these
2006 Jul 17
1
sem: negative parameter variances
Dear Spencer and Prof. Fox,
Thank you for your replies. I'll very appreciate, if you have any ideas concerning the problem described below.
First, I'd like to describe the model in brief.
In general I consider a model with three equations.
First one is for annual GRP growth - in general it looks like:
1) GRP growth per capita = G(investment, migration, initial GRP per
2018 Feb 05
1
Re-enable grub boot in UEFI (Windows took over it)
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Kay Diederichs
<kay.diederichs at uni-konstanz.de> wrote:
> grub-install /dev/nvme0n1
Running this on computers with UEFI firmware is not good advice, it's
an obsolete command. People should use the prebaked grubx64.efi binary
that comes in the grub2-efi package, and is a signed binary so it can
support UEFI Secure Boot.
If you run grub2-install, a
2007 May 04
0
Predicted Cox survival curves - factor coding problems...
I am trying to use the survfit() function with the newdata argument to
produce predicted survivor curves for a particular covariate profile.
The main purpose of the plot will be to visualise the effect of snp1,
coded 0 and 1. In my Cox model I have stratified by one variable, edu, and
so I know I will automatically get a separate curve for each strata. My
problem is how to deal with the
2011 Feb 16
0
Arima contents
Hello,
I'm running a number of arima models using the "arima" function. Often,
when lag length gets too high, these model don't converge and an error
message appears as this:
> reg <- arima(y,order=c(7,0,7),xreg=isr)
Warning message:
In arima(y, order = c(7, 0, 7), xreg = isr) :
possible convergence problem: optim gave code=1
In this case, when you print the results
2009 Feb 08
0
Initial values of the parameters of a garch-Model
Dear all,
I'm using R 2.8.1 under Windows Vista on a dual core 2,4 GhZ with 4 GB
of RAM.
I'm trying to reproduce a result out of "Analysis of Financial Time
Series" by Ruey Tsay.
In R I'm using the fGarch library.
After fitting a ar(3)-garch(1,1)-model
> model<-garchFit(~arma(3,0)+garch(1,1), analyse)
I'm saving the results via
> result<-model
2010 Aug 18
13
Poor creat/delete files performance
Hi,
We did some performance test and found the create/delete files performance
of btrfs is very poor.
The test is that we create 50000 files and measure the file-create time
first, and then delete these 50000 files and measure the file-delete time.
(The attached file is the reproduce program)
The result is following:
(Unit: second)
Create file performance
BtrFS Ext4
Total times: