similar to: Sweave in LATEX

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Sweave in LATEX"

2007 Oct 07
5
how to use \Sexpr{} with sweave
I'm trying to learn Sweave. So far things are going well with the chunks of code identified by << >>= But I'm having trouble with the in-line text use of \Sexpr. Here is a short example .Rnw file: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage[margin=1.25in]{geometry} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{Sweave} \begin{document} <<test>>= pnorm(1) @ \Sexpr{2+6}
2004 Jul 05
1
Apparent conflict between \Sexpr in Sweave and R2HTML
I have come across an apparent bug in the operation of Sweave. If I load the package R2HTML then execution of \Sexpr{} in an *.Rnw file no longer works. The \Sexpr{} code is simply written to the *.tex file. Below are my *.Rnw file, commands, and output. The Sweave file, Sweave-test-1_short.Rnw: % -*- mode: noweb; noweb-default-code-mode: R-mode; -*- \documentclass{article} \title{A Test
2012 Feb 23
1
Sexpr not getting expanded in Sweave
An Sweave file, 'test.Rnw': \documentclass{article} \title{Sweave minimal} \author{MK} \begin{document} \maketitle We try Sweave: <<1>>= data(airquality) summary(airquality) x <- airquality[1, 1] @ I try Sexpr: \Sexpr{x} We plot: \begin{center} <<2, fig=TRUE, echo=FALSE >>= boxplot(Ozone ~ Month, data = airquality) @ \end{center} \end{document} I check the
2013 Sep 02
1
Sweave: printing an underscore in the output from an R command
I am working with Sweave and would like to print out into my latex document the result of the R command version$platform So what I first tried in my .Rnw document was \Sexpr{print(version$platform)}. However, the output from this command is the string "x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0" (without the quotes). This contains an underscore, which is a special character in tex and so I get an error
2008 Apr 17
1
odfWeave \Sexpr
Dear All, Using odfWeave is working fine for me using code chunks <<...>>= ... @ But the inline \Sexpr{date()} is not evaluated and returns again \Sexpr{date()} instead of "Thu Apr 17 18:15:47 2008". What might be the reason for that, what do I have to look for? I'm using Windows XP, R 2.6.1, odfWeave_0.7.3 and OpenOffice 2.4. Session Info: R version 2.6.1
2006 Sep 20
2
Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)
Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \begin{document} This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} \end{document} The \Sexpr in the second line is processed even though the
2006 Sep 20
2
Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source (2.3.1patched and 2.4.0)
Hi all, On FC5, using: Version 2.3.1 Patched (2006-08-06 r38829) and today's R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-19 r39397) with the following .Rnw file: \documentclass[10pt]{article} \begin{document} This line should print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} %% This line should NOT print '2': \Sexpr{1 + 1} \end{document} The \Sexpr in the second line is processed even though the
2008 Mar 19
4
Sweave does not parse \Sexpr{}
Hi, has anybody encountered and solved the following problem? I continued work now on a different computer where I have also used Sweave successfully before. I can run Sweave() and it generates a .tex file. All code chunks are processed and translated to Latex perfectly fine but somehow only the \Sexpr{} tags are not parsed. This is an example .Rnw: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{Sweave}
2006 Aug 04
2
Sweave special token \\ from R to latex
Dear helpeRs, I would like to specify a newline command in R and pass it to latex via Sweave such that it corresponds to latex' \\ command. But that doesn't seem to be possible. If I Sweave the \n character, it just makes a new line in latex but not the \\ command. Is there a way such that the following code would result in latex in blablabla \\ blablabla on different line
2006 Sep 21
2
Sweave processes \Sexpr in commented LaTeX source
Marc, >I have a large .Rnw file and was in the process of doing some debugging. >I had set some R chunks to 'eval=false' in the process. This resulted in >some R objects not being created that were in turn used in the >subsequent \Sexpr's. I have often the same problem, I'm using a construct like : <<eval=F>>= x <- rnorm(100) @ I have
2010 Sep 30
2
Sweave and LaTeX beamer class
I am failing to uncover Sweave chunks step by step using the LaTeX beamer class. The following minimal example: \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage{Sweave} \begin{document} \begin{frame}[fragile] In the year \uncover<2->{25}\uncover<3->{\Sexpr{5*5}} \uncover<4->{ <<echo=TRUE, print=TRUE>>= 5*5*101 @ } \end{frame} \end{document} leads to an error message when
2007 Nov 29
1
extracting items from R objects and using them in \Sexpr with Sweave--problem with $
Running R 2.5.1 on WinXP with Tinn-R, and using Sweave via MikTex. I am having trouble with the code below: ------------------------------------------------------- <<lowerCI95>>= lowerCI95713 <- t.test(data713, alternative="greater") lowerCI95713.bound <- lowerCI95713$conf.int[1] @ Thus a lower 95\% confidence bound on the mean octane concentration is
2012 Apr 02
1
\Sexpr{}
Did anyone know whether the problem " it doesn't evaluate \Sexpr{} in Sweave" has been fixed? I checked r help page and realized it was asked a couple of years ago. But I didn't find solutions. Thanks for your help in advance! Hua [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2004 Dec 20
3
Sweave and LaTeX beamer class
Hi, has anyonne experienced problems between the LaTeX beamer class and Sweave? The following code does not work properly: ################################# \documentclass{beamer} \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{ngerman} \begin{document} \frame{ \frametitle{test} test <<>>= 1+1 @ } \end{document} ################################# Below is the
2009 May 09
2
Sweave \Sexpr{} advice please
Dear List, First off, my deepest gratitude to the Sweave developers: this tool has improved my quality greatly. A question in my work I use \Sexpr{} statements scalar values and the xtable package for all manner of tables. What I'd like to do is to use a vector inline, rather than a whole separate table. Something like: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% begin code % Latex junk % Sweave block:
2006 Dec 20
2
\Sexpr in MikTex
Greetings, \Sexpr{} has worked on MikTex with earlier versions of R, I can not seem to get it to work with R-2.4.0. I run Sweave with MikTex using the following statement in Run under Accessories. latex -include-directory="C:\Program Files\R\R-2.4.0\share\texmf" "C:\Documents and Settings\Suzette\Desktop\MyFile\MyProgram.tex" Any advice would be much appreciated, Suzette
2010 Nov 29
1
Sweave choking on \\ in filename
Dear all, Sweave chokes when using "\\" in the path to the Rnw file. Using "/" works fine. The problem is that Eclipse+StatET uses "\\" in the filename. And example of the error, traceback and sessionInfo are given below. Best regards, Thierry > Sweave("Q:\\BMK\\cursussen\\interne_opleiding\\deelnemerslijst.Rnw", syntax="SweaveSyntaxNoweb")
2009 Jun 30
2
Sweave: multiline Sexpr?
Is there any way to have Sexpr span multiple lines? -- David ? ----------------------------------------------------- David Huffer, Ph.D. Senior Statistician CSOSA/Washington, DC david.huffer at csosa.gov -----------------------------------------------------
2009 Feb 04
2
Sweave and \Sexpr{}
Hi: I am trying to create a dynamic latex table using \Sexpr{} but it's not evaluating it. I also tried the example below without Sweave and also fails. I have also copied the Sweave.sty to my working directory but nothing seems to work. Do I need to have certain package in order to run \Sexpr{}? \documentclass[a4paper]{article} \usepackage{C:/R/R-2.8.1/share/texmf/Sweave} \begin{document}
2011 Jan 26
2
Sweave: \Sexpr{} inside <<>>?
Hi, Is it possible in Sweave to put \Sexpr{} inside <<>>? This is a bad example, but here goes: <<results=hide>> Age <- 5 @ <<>> x <- \Sexpr{Age} @ I'm trying to get it to display x <- 5, rather than x <- Age. It's probably so obvious I'm going to feel sorry for having to ask, just the same, I'm stumped. Any ideas? Thanks. --