similar to: Building of Basecamp seminar in SF

OK, I have some basic functionality to support bind variables, it appears to work with the ''old'' %s style too. I''ve altered sanitize_conditions in activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb to check whether bind variables are in the statement (/\?/). If they are, replace all the ?s to escaped values from the arguments array. else santize and expand. There are a few

I have a module that sends email to the members that have subscribed to my site. When it runs through and sends them all emails, it crashes with certain emails with: 550 <email-x+rxnKfQbAxWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table This is on the other end right? And even so, is there a way to suppress it?

find_by_sql BREAKS THE OOP BEAUTY and perhaps we can solve that. NAMING CONVENTIONS can perhaps make find_by_sql much more clever. lets imagine that relation: publishers <- books <-> authors_books <-> authors -> universities (can''t find something else than university for that last association :) ) imagine we want to fetch every book and every associated

I''m currently caches_page the show method in my Image controller. The show method looks at @params[''id''] to determine what output should be generated. The first time I access the method, say with http://localhost/public/image/show/1.jpg, the appropriate directories get created in /public (i.e. public/image/show/1.jpg). However, when I try to retrieve

After *much* digging and playing around, I finally figured out how to unit test instance variables that are created by actions. It was more difficult than I expected. It seems like there should have been a more straight forward way to do this. Can someone enlighten me? A simplified and somewhat contrived example of what I am current doing: Thanks. Matt >> # My Controller of interest

Here''s the text of a quick note I''ve added to the Inheritance wiki page. I''m actually proposing that it would be a good idea to drop automatic single table inheritance and force people to declare it explicitly. There are two reasons for this: 1. Implicitly doing it unnecessarially limits your use of inheritance where you really need it: in your object-oriented

I am trying set up a rails app that utilizes components. I need to be able to pass some state (a bunch of name value pairs) from the Main controller to the component. Is there any way to pass this state info using render_component? Regards -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hello- I''m new to the ruby-based schemas and migrations. As I''m looking over examples and such online, I see that many of them don''t make use of schema-enforced attributes. For example, instead of: t.column "post_id", :integer, :default => 0, :null => false They do: t.column "post_id", :integer So I''m wondering -- is this

Instiki 0.9.2 has arrived. * The notorious "rollbacks by crawlers" bug fixed. * Instiki is distributed as a gem (experimental) * New maintainer (yours truly) * Assorted other minor changes Best regards, Alexey Verkhovsky ============= Don''t shoot the pianist, he''s doing his best README Path: README Last Update: Fri Jan 07 10:06:43

Hi all, I''ve more than one rails based applications on my machine. When I upgrade my gems (including rails), I usually have to upgrade each application to be able to continue developing/using it... But some of these web applications don''t need to be up to date. I would be happy enough with older version of rails for these applications (, or I don''t have time to fix

Hello, I have the following output when changing form Active Record 1.0.1 to ActiveRecord 1.6: [error] C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.4.0/lib/action_controller/support/dependencies.rb:24:in `depend_on'': uninitialized constant ActiveRecord::Mixins (ScriptError)\r [error] \tfrom

Hi I updated gem rails today and saw that rails had an update. With the new edition, I get a warning statement printed that was not in the two earlier versions. (No message with either: require_gem ''activerecord'', "= 1.0.0" require_gem ''activerecord'', "= 1.0.0.20041114" ) The code still works, but the warning makes no sense. Plus,

Hey- I ran into to some problems when trying to follow "A tutorial by Rails'' users." When I reached Step Three and executed the controller script as follows: ruby script/generate controller Friends list display new edit I got this error message: C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\rails>ruby script/generate controller Friends list display ne w edit

Does anyone know how to view the new source in IE after an AJAX update? When I "view -> source" I get the original page source, not the page source as updated. Thanks in advance, Bill -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060403/e8d96b2e/attachment.html

Rails 1.1 was a big upgrade with a lot of new features and we''ve been working hard since its release to polish off the kinks revealed after it was deployed to the masses. Rails 1.1.1 contains fixes for things like Prototype memory leaks in IE 6, Oracle adapter runnings, and a number of compatibility tweaks to make most older applications work. This release still doesn''t work

It''s been fifty days since our last confession, so it''s no wonder that this outpouring is by far the biggest yet in Rails history. It''s absolutely packed with goodies ranging from a whole new framework for sending email to the smallest new alias for an existing method. In total we''re just shy of 100 additions, changes, tweaks, and fixes. This is also

Hi, I''m developing an application where I''ll have to store a lot of images coming from the users. And I''m still not sure if I should store them in MySQl as blob or just store them on filesystem. If I store them on filesystem, how to scale when I''ll have to have multiple servers ? Thanks, Pratik -- rm -rf / 2>/dev/null - http://null.in

When I run rake against Rails 8.5 to test unaltered model tests with yaml fixtures I get the error and stack trace reproduced below for every one of my model objects. Has anyone seen something this before? Any idea what could be going on here? The following ruby-talk thread may or may not be relevant: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/95301. Thanks much,

Hello, I submitted a patch <http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3287> ( http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3287) a couple of days ago. The patch adds some methods into and changes the existing methods in the CaptureHelper module. It should not, as I can see, affect any existing Rails implementations. I added the relevant unit tests and all but one of the tests pass. The test that fails failed

So apparently 1.8.4 is soon forthcoming. We need testing against it. Could someone help out with that? I believe Ara already checked into some of the issues, do you know if those are resolved, Ara? -- David Heinemeier Hansson http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain http://www.basecamphq.com -- Online project management http://www.backpackit.com -- Personal information manager