similar to: how specify lme() with multiple within-subject factors?

I don't think, this has been answered: > I'm trying to run a 3-way within-subject anova in lme with 3 > fixed factors (Trust, Sex, and Freq), but get stuck with handling > the random effects. As I want to include all the possible random > effects in the model, it would be something more or less > equivalent to using aov > > > fit.aov <- aov(Beta ~ >

In Baron and Li's "Notes on the use of R for psychology experiments and questionnaires" http://cran.r-project.org/doc/contrib/rpsych.htm they describe a balanced data set for a drug experiment: "... a test of drug treatment effect by one between-subject factor: group (two groups of 8 subjects each) and two within-subject factors: drug (2 levels) and dose (3 levels). "

Dear all, In lme, models in which a factor is fully "contained" in another lead to an error. This is not the case when using lm/aov. I understand that these factors are aliased, but believe that such models make sense when the factors are fitted sequentially. For example, I sometimes fit a factor first as linear term (continuous variable with discrete levels, e.g. 1,2,4,6), and

Sorry for reposting, but even after extensive search I still did not find any answers. using: summary(aov(pointErrorAbs~noOfSegments*turnAngle+Error(subj/(noOfSegments+turnAngle)), data=anovaAllData )) with subj being a random factor and noOfSegments and turnAngle being fixed factors, I get the following results: ---------------------------------------------- Error: subj Df Sum

Dear r-help, With lme, is there a way to specify multiple fixed factors under one level of grouping? For example, for a single fixed factor, I use the following: fm1.lme <- lme(fixed=resp ~ fact1, random=~1|subj/fact1, data=mydata) I would like to have multiple factors under subj, like the following for a two-way design, but I get an error: fm2.lme <- lme(fixed=resp ~ fact1*fact2,

Dear ExpeRts, Suppose I have a typical psychological experiment that is a within-subjects design with multiple crossed variables and a continuous response variable. Subjects are considered a random effect. So I could model > aov1 <- aov(resp~fact1*fact2+Error(subj/(fact1*fact2)) However, this only holds for orthogonal designs with equal numbers of observation and no missing values.

Dear list, As a reply to my recent mail: > simint and TukeyHSD work for aov objects. > Can someone point me to similar functions for lme objects? Douglas Bates wrote There aren't multiple comparison methods for lme objects because it is not clear how to do multiple comparisons for these. I don't think the theory of multiple comparisons extends easily to lme models. One could

I'm starting to understand fixed and random effects, but I'm puzzled a bit. Here is an example from Hays's textbook (which is great at explaining fixed vs. random effects, at least to dummies like me), from the section on mixed models. You need library(nlme) in order to run it. ------ task <- gl(3,2,36) # Three tasks, a fixed effect. subj <- gl(6,6,36) # Six subjects, a random

I am doing an analysis and would like to use lme() and the multcomp package to do multiple comparisons. My design is a within subjects design with three crossed fixed factors (every participant sees every combination of three fixed factors A,B,C). Of course, I can use aov() to analyze this with an error term (leaving out the obvious bits): y ~ A*B*C+Error(Subject/(A*B*C)) I'd also like

I have 2 questions on ANOVA with 1 between subjects factor and 2 within factors. 1. I am confused on how to do the analysis with aov because I have seen two examples on the web with different solutions. a) Jon Baron (http://www.psych.upenn.edu/~baron/rpsych/rpsych.html) does 6.8.5 Example 5: Stevens pp. 468 - 474 (one between, two within) between: gp within: drug, dose aov(effect ~ gp * drug *

This is a continuing issue with the one on the list a long time ago (I couldn't find a solution to it from the web): -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using a formula converted with as.formula with lme leads > to an error message. Same works ok with lm, and with > lme and a fixed formula. > > # demonstrates problems with lme and

Hi, I posted the message below last week, but no answers, so I'm giving it another attempt in case somebody who would be able to help might have missed it and it has now dropped off the end of the list of mails. I am fairly new to R and still trying to figure out how it all works, and I have run into a few issues. I apologize in advance if my questions are a bit basic, I'm also no

Using a formula converted with as.formula with lme leads to an error message. Same works ok with lm, and with lme and a fixed formula. # demonstrates problems with lme and as.formula demo<-data.frame(x=1:20,y=(1:20)+rnorm(20),subj=as.factor(rep(1:2,10))) demo.lm1<-lme(y~x,data=demo,random=~1|subj) print(summary(demo.lm1)) newframe<-data.frame(x=1:5,subj=rep(1,5))

Dear List, This is my first post, and I'm a relatively new R user trying to work out a mixed effects model using lme() with random effects, and a correlation structure, and have looked over the archives, & R help on lme, corClasses, & etc extensively for clues. My programming experience is minimal (1 semester of C). My mentor, who has much more programming experience, but a comparable

Hi, I'm trying to set up AR(1) as a correlation structure in modeling some data (attached file data.txt in text format) with lme, but have trouble getting it to work. Incent, Correctness, and Oppor are 3 categorical variables, Beta is a response variable, and Time is an equally-spaced variable with 6 time points (treated as a categorical variable as well). Basically I want to model the

My question concerns the logic behind hypothesis tests for fixed-effect terms in models fitted with lme. Suppose the levels of Subj indicate a grouping structure (k subjects) and Trt is a two-level factor (two treatments) for which there are several (n) responses y from each treatment and subject combination. If one suspects a subject by treatment interaction, either of the following models seem

Hi all, I'm doing a Repeated-Measures ANOVA, but I don't know how to test its contrasts or where to find the p-values of its coefficients. I know how to find the coefficient estimates of a contrast, but not how to test these estimates. First I do something like: y.aov <- aov(y ~ fac1 * fac2 + Error(subj/(fac1 * fac2)), data=data) Then, with coef(y.aov) I get the coefficients

In my undertstanding of the problem, the model lme1 <- lme(resp~fact1*fact2, random=~1|subj) should be ok, providing that variances are homogenous both between & within subjects. The function will sort out which factors & interactions are to be compared within subjects, & which between subjects. The problem with df's arises (for lme() in nlme, but not in lme4), when

Dear All, Comparing linear mixed effect models in SAS and R, I found the following discrepancy: SAS R random statement random subj(program); random = ~ 1 | Subj -2*loglik 1420.8 1439.363 random effects variance(Intercept) 9.6033 9.604662

I do not think anyone has answered this. > I'm trying to run a simple one-way ANCOVA with the lmer > function in R package lme4, but have encountered some > conceptual problem. The data file MyData.txt is like this: > > Group Subj Cov Resp > A 1 3.90 4.05 > A 2 4.05 4.25 > A 3 4.25 3.60 > A 4 3.60 4.20 > A 5 4.20 4.05 > A 6 4.05 3.85