similar to: Net::STMP FatalError

OK, I have some basic functionality to support bind variables, it appears to work with the ''old'' %s style too. I''ve altered sanitize_conditions in activerecord/lib/active_record/base.rb to check whether bind variables are in the statement (/\?/). If they are, replace all the ?s to escaped values from the arguments array. else santize and expand. There are a few

I am going on Tuesday. Anybody else here going? Gleb

Hello- I''m new to the ruby-based schemas and migrations. As I''m looking over examples and such online, I see that many of them don''t make use of schema-enforced attributes. For example, instead of: t.column "post_id", :integer, :default => 0, :null => false They do: t.column "post_id", :integer So I''m wondering -- is this

Does anyone know how to view the new source in IE after an AJAX update? When I "view -> source" I get the original page source, not the page source as updated. Thanks in advance, Bill -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060403/e8d96b2e/attachment.html

Hi all, I''ve more than one rails based applications on my machine. When I upgrade my gems (including rails), I usually have to upgrade each application to be able to continue developing/using it... But some of these web applications don''t need to be up to date. I would be happy enough with older version of rails for these applications (, or I don''t have time to fix

Hello, I have the following output when changing form Active Record 1.0.1 to ActiveRecord 1.6: [error] C:/dev/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-1.4.0/lib/action_controller/support/dependencies.rb:24:in `depend_on'': uninitialized constant ActiveRecord::Mixins (ScriptError)\r [error] \tfrom

Hi I updated gem rails today and saw that rails had an update. With the new edition, I get a warning statement printed that was not in the two earlier versions. (No message with either: require_gem ''activerecord'', "= 1.0.0" require_gem ''activerecord'', "= 1.0.0.20041114" ) The code still works, but the warning makes no sense. Plus,

Hey- I ran into to some problems when trying to follow "A tutorial by Rails'' users." When I reached Step Three and executed the controller script as follows: ruby script/generate controller Friends list display new edit I got this error message: C:\Inetpub\wwwroot\rails>ruby script/generate controller Friends list display ne w edit

Rails 1.1 was a big upgrade with a lot of new features and we''ve been working hard since its release to polish off the kinks revealed after it was deployed to the masses. Rails 1.1.1 contains fixes for things like Prototype memory leaks in IE 6, Oracle adapter runnings, and a number of compatibility tweaks to make most older applications work. This release still doesn''t work

find_by_sql BREAKS THE OOP BEAUTY and perhaps we can solve that. NAMING CONVENTIONS can perhaps make find_by_sql much more clever. lets imagine that relation: publishers <- books <-> authors_books <-> authors -> universities (can''t find something else than university for that last association :) ) imagine we want to fetch every book and every associated

Hello, I submitted a patch <http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3287> ( http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/3287) a couple of days ago. The patch adds some methods into and changes the existing methods in the CaptureHelper module. It should not, as I can see, affect any existing Rails implementations. I added the relevant unit tests and all but one of the tests pass. The test that fails failed

Hi, I''m developing an application where I''ll have to store a lot of images coming from the users. And I''m still not sure if I should store them in MySQl as blob or just store them on filesystem. If I store them on filesystem, how to scale when I''ll have to have multiple servers ? Thanks, Pratik -- rm -rf / 2>/dev/null - http://null.in

When I run rake against Rails 8.5 to test unaltered model tests with yaml fixtures I get the error and stack trace reproduced below for every one of my model objects. Has anyone seen something this before? Any idea what could be going on here? The following ruby-talk thread may or may not be relevant: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/95301. Thanks much,

I''m working on a RoR project and a requirement has popped up that would required certain actions to happen at certain time intervals (as opposed to having a user initiate the action). Is there anything similar to Java''s Quartz library, *nix cron, or anything of the like for Rails? I''m certainly willing to help with/test Ruby code if someone on the list is already

I have gotten acts_as_taggable to work for a test application as documented on taggable.rubyforge.org I am following Chad''s excellent examples in ROR Recipes Beta book. I have a few questions and hope that Chad or some other expert can help clarify them. 1. Why is the book suggesting to use taggings table instead of tags_contacts, as mentioned on taggable.rubyforge.org?

Textdrive upgraded to Rails 1.1 already. I have an older rails app, and am now getting the following error: c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activesupport-1.3.0 /lib/active_support/depende ncies.rb:112:in `const_missing'': uninitialized constant LoadingModule (NameEr ror) from ./script/../config/environment.rb:91 from

Hello all, I just successfully updated my dev env to Rails 1.0. I then wanted to get .rjs templates working and followed Cody''s instructions at http://www.codyfauser.com/articles/2005/12/02/rails-rjs-templates-plugin . However, when I try to run ''rake test'' I get the following error: (in

Cheers, I have a problem with 1.0 and a habtm relationship between User and Article. I want to save all articles that users read. I have these models: class User < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :read_articles, :class_name => "Article", :join_table => "read_articles" ... end class Article < ActiveRecord::Base has_and_belongs_to_many :readers,

Hi all, I submitted a patch the other day for an issue I ran into running an "add_column" migration on a sqlite3 database when there is existing data in the table, and the new column has ":null=>false". Details at http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/5215. The issue I encountered was not picked due to the unit test not having any actual data in it before running the

So apparently 1.8.4 is soon forthcoming. We need testing against it. Could someone help out with that? I believe Ara already checked into some of the issues, do you know if those are resolved, Ara? -- David Heinemeier Hansson http://www.loudthinking.com -- Broadcasting Brain http://www.basecamphq.com -- Online project management http://www.backpackit.com -- Personal information manager