similar to: fft inverse display help

I started out with a real vector b and then obtained its Fourier transform thus B<-fft(b) When I did F<-fft(B, inv=TRUE) I expected that F would be the inverse FT of B but it still has imaginary components. Should the inverse FT not be purely real? Am I missing something? Thanks, Peter.

Hi, I'm in dire need of a fast fourier transformation for me stupid biologist, i.e. I have a heartbeat signal and would like to decompose it into pure sin waves, getting three vectors, one containing the frequencies of the sin waves, one the magnitudes and one the phases (that's what I get from my data acquisition software's FFT function). I'd be very much obliged, if someone

Hello, I'm new to R (using it since about two weeks), but absolutely a fan of it from the beginning on. :-) Best tool for working with data I found. :-) I tried using the fft() and other funcitons for analysing time series. What I would be glad to have, would be a convenient way to display the complex result of a fft in a way, that real and imaginary parts each use an axis for themselves,

R 1.4.1, Linux and Windows for(i in 1:1000) { X <- rnorm(i) XX <- fft(fft(X), inverse=T)/i if(max(Mod(XX-X)) > 1e-10) print(i) } [1] 392 [1] 588 [1] 968 [1] 980 and I then get a segfault during gc(). The answers are way off, with imaginary parts 1e10 or more. These numbers are all multiples of 7^2 or 11^2. (Based on a report to R-help Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:37:34

Is anyone can help me with this ? I'm really desperate. Thx in ad. From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Ikka - Mitra Kreasindo Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 5:02 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Mixmonitor command parameter problem on

Will oggenc have a lowpass switch? I would prefer to lowpass at 15-16khz at -q3 for use with FM broadcasting. The additional frequencies would be chopped off anyway by the transmiters hardware lowpass filter so the encoder could use the addition bits for other purposes. It could be enforced that the lowpass can only be reduced and not increased from the default. This would stop people

I would very much like a lowpass option because for FM radio broadcasting I don't want to encode frequencies above 15khz. I'm waiting for this option before switching to ogg from mp3(lame). Ross. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-vorbis@xiph.org [mailto:owner-vorbis@xiph.org]On Behalf Of > Gian-Carlo Pascutto > Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2001 01:46 > To:

Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > There is definitely some use for a Neon fixed-point FFT. How much > exactly I'm not sure. Fixed-point is a bit more than just a fall-back Well, we use fixed-point mode by default in Firefox for both Firefox OS and Fennec (Firefox on Android). The reason is that, although there is some NEON-class hardware where float does finally appear to be a little bit

Thanks Timothy and Jean-Marc, I will start NEON optimizing fixed-point FFT. Is it int32 good enough? Benchmark data shows that FFT using int16 is much faster than FFT using int32. > -----Original Message----- > From: Timothy B. Terriberry [mailto:tterribe at xiph.org] > Sent: Friday, December 26, 2014 6:52 AM > To: Phil Wang; opus at xiph.org > Cc: Zhongwei Yao; Yang Zhang; Zhou

There is definitely some use for a Neon fixed-point FFT. How much exactly I'm not sure. Fixed-point is a bit more than just a fall-back for CPUs with no FPU. There are CPUs for which fixed-point is still faster. It depends on the exact model but also on what you run. For example, even on x86 I believe that SILK encoding is slightly faster in fixed-point, even though CELT is faster in float.

Hello! thank you for your efforts creating R! While preparing the next lessons I found that I had to multiply with 1/length(x) by hand if I want to get the inverse Fouriertransform. The help states it will do it by itself. Version R-0.60.1, Linux Seems to be pretty easy to correct either the fft or :-) the help(fft)! Cu Detlef Detlef Steuer Universitaet Dortmund ///////

Hi everyone, I have profiled Opus on AArch64. I just run opus_demo with some pcm files. Following is time proportion of FFT with different bitrate. Bitrate | Time cost by FFT/iFFT 24kb/s | 15% 48kb/s | 15% 96kb/s | 13% Any comment? I want some data close to real application, any suggestion? Thanks, Phil Wang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> I am working on DSP module of Ne10. I see there are fixed-point and > floating-point FFT inside Opus. Is fixed-point FFT only a fall back for CPU > without VFP? On ARMv7-A and ARMv8-A, benchmark result shows that fixed-point > (int32) and floating-point (float32) FFT have similar performance. I guess > fixed-point version is not often used on these platforms. Is it worth the >

Back in the day, when I was still using LAME, I was aware of the fact that the program would cut off frequencies above a certain level (lowpass). With 192 kbps this was usually around 20Khz (which is the highest frequency a human can hear, as far as I know), and at 128 something like 16Khz. Does Vorbis do something similar? If so, does someone have a chart of the cutoffs at the different quality

Important (imho)! I found this site in the internet: http://www.plusv.org/ PlusV is an audio enhancement algorithm similar to SRB of Mp3Pro, but 1) better than SBR 2) Fully open-source It seems to me wise to include PlusV into new versions of Ogg Vorbis. P.S. what about some long-awaited features in Ogg Vorbis? 1) ability to turn off the frequency filter in the encoder (especially for high

Hi, I am working on DSP module of Ne10. I see there are fixed-point and floating-point FFT inside Opus. Is fixed-point FFT only a fall back for CPU without VFP? On ARMv7-A and ARMv8-A, benchmark result shows that fixed-point (int32) and floating-point (float32) FFT have similar performance. I guess fixed-point version is not often used on these platforms. Is it worth the effort to NEON-optimize

I am in the process of dropping the TI DSP lib fft routines into the AEC. Currently, FFTWrap.c uses the USE_SMALLFT and USE_KISS_FFT to select between two packages of FFT routines. ] #ifdef USE_SMALLFT ... #elif defined(USE_KISS_FFT) ... #else #error No other FFT implemented #endif My guess is that every DSP and many other processors will have their own specific FFT and iFFT. What method

Dear Experts, I want to know if the KISS FFT in opus can be replaced with fast FFT. What are the implications & things to be taken care if this is done. Also, I saw in FFT code comments that in-line FFT not supported. Please let me know the reason for this. Thanks in advance. Regards, Mahantesh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello Guys, I am trying to convert files that are .wac to mp3 after mixmonitor command is called but it doesnt execute the command, I tried the command in terminal it worked, any help please ... below is my dial plan exten=6500,n,Set(MIXMONITOR_EXEC=&& nice -n 19 /usr/local/bin/lame -b 8 -t -F -m m --bitwidth 8 --quiet "/var/spool/asterisk/monitor/${CALLFILENAME}.wav"

The book "Numerical Recipes in Fortran77" by Press, Teukolsky, Vetterling and Flannery describes a way to "pack" the even and odd coordinates of a real vector "R" into a complex vector "C" of half the length. Then using various FFT symmetries, they extract the FFT of "R" from the FFT of "C" which is half the length of "R",