similar to: multiple comparisons for MANOVA results

Bonjour, we wanted to fit a manova as descripted in Marieta /et al./ 2003, "convergent habitat segregation of /Aedes aegyptii/ and /Aedes albopictus/ (Diptera: /Culicidae/) in Southern Brazil and Florida", /J. Med. Entomol./, *40* (6), 785-794. They did their analysis with SAS software. We have the same kind of data with two insect species and city, habitat and season factors. We

Hi, I'm wondering if i can use the function "TukeyHSD" to perform the all pairwise comparisons of a "aov()" model with one factor (e.g., GROUP) and one continuous covariate (e.g., AGE). I did for example: library(multcomp) data('litter', package = 'multcomp') litter.aov <- aov(weight ~ gesttime + dose, data = litter) TukeyHSD(litter.aov, which =

Hi, I'm trying to make sense of the options for multiple comparisons options in R. I've found the following options: pairwise.t.test, which provides standard t-tests, with options for choosing an appropriate correction for multiple comparisons TukeyHSD, which provides the usual Tukey test glht(package multcomp), which provides a variety of options >From the help list, it appears

Dear fellow R.users/.lovers, I am very new to both R and this list, so I hope you will be patient with me in the beginning if my enquiries are inappropriate/unclear. I am trying to perform some rather complex statistical modelling using mixed-effects models. I have, after a rather difficult beginning, finally boiled down my model (using the lme function in nlme) to a couple of fixed effects

Hi Sergio Doing those tests 30 times is going to give you a huge Type I error rate, even if there was a function that did that. There is a reason why TukeyHSD doesn't make it easy. In general, if there are useful comparisons among the species, you are better off setting up and testing contrasts than doing all-pairwise Tukey tests. Also, the PCA scores are ordered in terms of variance

Hello, I am trying to do a manova test in r, and have used the "manova" function to test differences between two dependent variables. The results were significant for the whole model, but the sources I've read say that in order to do a post-hoc multiple comparison, I have to do separate aovs for each dependent variable, then call the TukeyHSD function. I have used the TukeyHSD with

Dear all, I need to do a Manova but I have an unbalanced design. I have morphological measurements similar to the iris dataset, but I don't have the same number of measurements for all species. Does anyone know a procedure to do Manova with this kind of input in R? Thank you very much, Naiara. -------------------------------------------- Naiara S. Pinto Ecology, Evolution and Behavior 1

Also, this works (taking out multcomp=TRUE, multcompmethod="adjusted"): com.test=ma(Head.W1~Leg.3.1+Site, type="elevation", data=queens) print(com.test) ....so for some reason it will do an MA regression on all my data point together, but shows an error when I try to do pairwise comparisons between groups. Thank you, Ioulia -------- On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Ioulia

I'm trying to do an ANCOVA with two factors (clipping treatment with two levels, and plot with 4 levels) and a covariate (stem diameter). The response variable is fruit number. The minimal adequate model looks like this: model3<-lm(fruit~clip + plot + st.dia + clip:plot) I'd like to get some multiple comparisons like the ones from TukeyHSD, but TukeyHSD doesn't work with the

Hi, I've got this model and following Hothorn et al advices, I used glht for a post hoc comparison > modezqM<-glm(rojos~estacion*zona3,quasipoisson,subset=(edadysexo=="M")) > anova(modezqM,test="F") Df Deviance Resid. Df Resid. Dev F Pr(>F) NULL 293 41148

I've never seen anything written about multiple comparisons, as in the multcomp package or with TukeyHSD, but using a glm. Do such procedures exist? Are they sensible? Are there any packages in R that implement such comparisons? Thank you. -- Ken Knoblauch Inserm U371 Cerveau et Vision 18 avenue du Doyen Lepine 69675 Bron cedex France Tel: +33 (0)4 72 91 34 77 Fax: +33 (0)4 72 91 34 61

I am trying to apply a permuation-based MANOVA (Anderson 2001) to a set of morphological data from three ecomorphs of fish reared under two different conditions and measured at two points during ontogeny. I will supply a distance matrix based on Procrustes distances calculated outside of vegan. I have not found an example of a design such as this for adonis. However, I have designed my factors

I'm interested in restricting the pairwise comparisons of interaction effects in a multi-way factorial ANOVA, because I find comparisons of interactions between all different variables different to interpret. For example (supposing a p<0.10 cutoff just to be able to use this example): > summary(fm1 <- aov(breaks ~ wool*tension, data = warpbreaks)) Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F

I am a new R user but a long time SAS user. I searched for a response to this question but no luck, so forgive me if this topic has been covered before. I am running a TukeyHSD post hoc test after running an ANOVA. I get the results of all pairwise comparisons, no problem. However, the output table is a little "busy", and I'd like to make the output easier to read. Specifically, I

Hi, I have data with binomial response variable (survival) and 2 categorical independent variables (site and treatment) (see below).? I have run a binomial GLM and found that both IVs and the interaction are significant.? Now I want to do a post-hoc test for all pairwise comparisons to see which treatment groups differ.? I tried the glht function in the multcomp package, but I get surprising

Hello, the title says it all. I have an ANOVA model with "Error" term and the functions TukeyHSD or those from the "multcomp" package seem not to work with such a model. Assuming that the object returned from aov() function with multiple strata is a list of aov objects, I tried something like TukeyHSD(aov.1$Within), but this does not work either. Does somebody have a

Hello, I have a unconventional question arising from my current master thesis on regression modeling. Suppose we have fitted a (linear) relationship between a dependent variable y and an independent variable x. Now we choose two points on the x-axis, i.e. according to percentiles x10 and x90. These two points are chosen to select the data points for two groups in order to perform pairwise

Dear R-developeRs, Attached follows a patch against svn 34959 that adds the printing of p-values to the TukeyHSD.aov function in stats package. I also updated the corresponding documentation file and added a 'see also' reference to the simint function of the multcomp package. As it was already brought up in a previous thread [1] in R-help, one can obtain the adjusted

Hi, I was trying to figure out how to do post-hoc tests for Two Way ANOVAs and found the following 2 approaches: a. Do pairwise t-tests (bonferroni corrected) if one finds significance with the ANOVA. Link- http://rtutorialseries.blogspot.com/2011/01/r-tutorial-series-two-way-anova-with.html b. Do TukeyHSD on an aov model Link-

Dear all, I was trying to understand how "multcomp" package works by running the examples given in the documentation. However I still don't understand when it comes to multiple comparison set by user (please refer to "Ksub" in the code). Therefore I run 2 other cases along with the original example (case 1), with the expectation I'll get the point from the output. The