Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "From time-strings to Unix-Epoche-time?"
2004 Aug 19
2
proposed change to [.POSIXct
R developers,
The "tzone" attribute is stripped from a POSIXct object when the subscript
command is called ("[.POISXct"). This results in dates being printed in the
locale specific format after a subscript operation is applied to a POSIXct
object which has cause several problems for me in the past.
Here is an example of this problem under R 1.9.1:
> x <-
2009 Jan 07
1
Parse-Error creates strange function calls (completely different printouts) (PR#13436)
Full_Name: Oliver Bandel
Version: R version 2.7.1 (2008-06-23)
OS: Linux (Debian Lenny)
Submission from: (NULL) (88.73.82.147)
Hello,
I have written a small R-script.
When I inserted one line of code, the behaviour was completely different!
Instead of just printing one line more to the output,
the complete call of the function in which this line was added,
is different, and instead of one such
2008 Feb 16
3
Arithmetic bug? (found when use POSIXct) (PR#10776)
Full_Name: Bo Zhou
Version: 2.6.1 (2007-11-26)
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (207.237.54.242)
Hi,
I found an arithmetic problem when I'm doing something with POSIXct
The code to reproduce it is as follows (This is the recommended way of finding
out time zone difference on R News 2004-1 Page 32 URL
http://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/Rnews_2004-1.pdf)
a=Sys.time()
2004 Aug 17
3
Fwd: strptime() problem?
Hi all;
I've already send a similar e-mail to the list and Prof. Brian Ripley
answered me but my doubts remain unresolved. Thanks for the clarification,
but perhaps I wasn't clear enough in posting my questions.
I've got a postgres database which I read into R. The first column is
Timestamp with timezone, and my data are already in UTC format. An 'printed'
extract of R
2010 Sep 03
1
Incorrect formatted output after subtracting non-integer seconds from POSIXt origin
> x<-as.POSIXct("1970-1-1", tz="UTC")-.5
> y<-as.POSIXct("1970-1-1", tz="UTC")+.5
> x==y
[1] FALSE # of course
but x and y "appear" to be the same when formatted, even with extra
precision:
> format(x, format="%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%OS2")
[1] "1970-01-01 00:00:00.50"
> format(y, format="%Y-%m-%d
2008 Sep 15
4
sprintf does not fill with "0"?!
Hello,
please look here:
=================================================================
>
> sprintf("%03s", as.character(1:5))
[1] " 1" " 2" " 3" " 4" " 5"
>
=================================================================
There should be a leading "0" isntead of space-chars?!
I use R version
2018 May 16
2
Date method of as.POSIXct does not respect tz
R 3.5.0
Is it intended that the Date method of as.POSIXct does not respect the
tz parameter? I suggest changing as.POSIXct.Date to this:
function (x, tz = "", ...)
.POSIXct(unclass(x) * 86400, tz = tz)
Currently, the best workaround seems to be using the character method if
one doesn't want the default timezone (which is often an annoying DST
timezone).
This came up on
2008 Oct 10
2
rgl-snapshot failed (err-msg: "failed")
Hello,
I tried to use rgl.snapshot and it failed.
The error message was not very verbose:
======================
>
>
> plot3d( motion[[idx+2]], motion[[idx+1]], motion[[idx]] )
> rgl.snapshot(filename="/tmp/shot_01.png", fmt="png")
[1] "failed"
>
======================
There was a graphic created by rgl, but the snapshot was
not created.
The
2019 May 01
3
anyNA() performance on vectors of POSIXct
Inside of the anyNA() function, it will use the legacy any(is.na()) code if
x is an OBJECT(). If x is a vector of POSIXct, it will be an OBJECT(), but
it is also TYPEOF(x) == REALSXP. Therefore, it will skip the faster
ITERATE_BY_REGION, which is typically 5x faster in my testing.
Is the OBJECT() condition really necessary, or could it be moved after the
switch() for the individual TYPEOF(x)
2010 Mar 18
1
how to return "date" part of POSIXct
How do I get a number representing a date from a POSIXct i.e. removing the
time elements?
--
View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/how-to-return-date-part-of-POSIXct-tp1598109p1598109.html
Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
2004 Oct 05
2
correct my method of estimating mean of two POSIXlt data frames
Hello, I searched the archives but could not come to a solution. I
have to two columns of information
t_start_cdt looks like:
> t_start_cdt[1:4]
[1] "2003-07-09 11:02:25" "2003-07-09 11:10:25" "2003-07-09 11:30:25"
[4] "2003-07-09 12:00:25"
> class(t_start_cdt)
[1] "POSIXt" "POSIXlt"
t_end_cdt looks like:
> t_end_cdt[1:4]
2012 Nov 10
4
help on date dataset
Hi everybody,
I am beginer in R and I need your precious help.
I want to create a small function in R as in sas to retrieve date.
I have a file with data that import in R.
DATE PAYS nb_pays.ILI.
1 24/04/2009 usa 0
2 24/04/2009 usa 0
3 24/04/2009 Mexique 0
4 24/04/2009
2008 Jan 27
1
bug in difftime with as.POSIXct
I am trying to do ephemeris calculations in R, which involves calculating an
elapsed time. As illustrated below, difftime seems to have problems with my
method, since the fractional day is sometimes the correct 0.5 and sometimes
the incorrect 0.46.
I am doing this on with R-2.6.1 on a powerpc-apple-darwin8.10.1 system.
I get the same results for as.POSIXlt() instead of as.POSIXct(), but the
2011 Sep 19
2
fechas ??
Hola a todos:
Tengo un problema con las fechas, básicamente necesito una diferencia en días y siempre se sale en segundos. Salvo un ejemplo copiado de un libro, pero yo necesito procesar los datos propios. Les paso el código en R (copiar y pegar, son solo dos días que se comparan) y al final como me salen los resultados porque es medio complicada mi redacción.
¿Alguna idea?
fechas1
2005 Feb 10
3
question about sorting POSIXt vector
Dear useRs,
How come the first attempt to sort a POSIXt vector fails (Error:
non-atomic type in greater), while the second succeeds? (Code inserted
below.) The documentation says that POSIXt is used to allow operations
such as subtraction, so I'd expect sorting to work. Is this perhaps an
OS issue? (I run R 2.0.1 on Win xp.)
Thank you,
b.
#------------code
test <- c("2005-02-08
2003 Jan 03
4
as.POSIXct problem?
Under
platform i686-pc-linux-gnu
arch i686
os linux-gnu
system i686, linux-gnu
status
major 1
minor 6.1
year 2002
month 11
day 01
language R
> x <- strptime(c('10/10/1969','12/31/2002'),format='%m/%d/%Y')
2004 May 19
2
POSIX to ts and back to POSIX
I am trying to use POSIX datetime objects rather than chron datetime
objects but am having difficulty with POSIX in a time series. My
question: Once a POSIXct vector is bound to a time series, is there a
function to convert back to POSIXct? The following code demonstrates
what I am trying to do.
> ts(as.POSIXct(strptime(tmp,"%m/%d/%Y %H:%M:%S")),freq=1440)
Time Series:
Start =
2009 Oct 15
2
forwarded: bug (?) in cut.POSIXt with "breaks"=integer
From: Vitalie S. <vitosmail <at> rambler.ru>
Subject: Bug in cut.POSIXt
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lang.r.general
Date: 2009-10-15 15:47:48 GMT (1 hour and 29 minutes ago)
Hello Everyone,
Before reporting decided to post here first:
tt <- structure(c(1254238817, 1254238859, 1254238969, 1254239080), class =
c("POSIXt",
2009 Sep 11
1
What determines the unit of POSIXct differences?
Dear All,
what determines if a difference between POSIXct objects gets
expressed in days or seconds?
In the following example, it's sometimes seconds, sometimes days.
as.POSIXct('2009-09-01') - as.POSIXct(NA)
Time difference of NA secs
c(as.POSIXct('2009-09-01'), as.POSIXct(NA)) -
c(as.POSIXct('2009-09-01'), as.POSIXct('2009-08-31'))
Time differences in
2008 Oct 12
2
numeric derivation
Hello,
I don't understand the description / help-text for the
numericDeriv() function.
Why is there a new environment used?
And what is meant with an environment here?
Is it similar or the same as a local workspace,
like an environment in functional languages?
And why is it needed here?
numericDeriv could just calculate the difference bewtween two
values and divide this difference by the