similar to: Error of exp() in a dll from Fortran

So, tried again from scratch. Again, CentOS 5.3, which is essentially RHEL 5.3. ./configure --with-blas="-L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml" In config.log, get things like configure:37199: checking for dgemm_ in -L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml configure:37230: gcc -std=gnu99 -o conftest -g -O2 -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib64 conftest.c

Hi, Has anyone had any luck in using portland group compiler to build R(-devel) with AMD's pgi compiled ACML library? I've downloaded the packages and set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and run configuration script as follow: % ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/R.pgcc --with-blas='-lacml' However, it failed to pick up double complex BLAS, checking for sgemm_ in -lacml... yes checking

While I recently received some very helpful files and email from Kevin Hendricks for compiling with ATLAS, thought I'd first have a stab at ACML. Having problems, which I suspect are trivial to solve: 1. machine is running RHEL 4, meaning, it uses gcc 3.4.5 out of the box, and g77. In my experience, over-riding RHEL's choice, and manually upgrading to gcc 4.x.x (and, as a consequence

I'm trying to build R-devel with AMD's ACML. I downloaded version 3.0.0 64bit for gfortran (acml-3-0-0-gfortran-64bit.tgz) and copied the libraries to /usr/local/lib. When I configure R to build against the ACML library, how do I know if the library has been detected and will be used? I run 'configure' with the '--with-blas=-lacml' flag and am using gcc 4.0.2 (with

Hi, I'm having problems using ACML with R. I made two changes in config.site by setting LDFLAGS="-L/opt/acml3.1.0/gnu64/lib" BLAS_LIBS="-lacml" ./config and make go through but when I try to use the lm() function, I get the error message Error in chol2inv(Qr$qr[p1, p1, drop = FALSE]) : lapack routines cannot be loaded In addition: Warning message: unable to load

Greetings - I'm trying to compile R under GNU/Linux (RHEL 4) on a multi-Opteron box, with ACML support. First, I downloaded and installed ACML 3.5 - GNU version, although I'm not entirely sure what the differences are - from the AMD website. The ACML libraries were installed to /opt/acml3.5.0/ Second, I ran ./configure --with-blas='-lacml' The configure went fine,

Greetings - For a host of reasons I chose (was forced) to upgrade my multi-Opteron box from Fedora 7 -> Fedora 8. In the process, I also updated the ACML I had installed from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0. While I get no errors (that I can find) in the config -> make -> make install sequence, I'm pretty sure (based on some benchmarks) that I'm not getting BLAS and/or Lapack to compile in. So,

Hallo, I've just installed R on our Opteron System (AMD Opteron 246). Running make check-all results in a failure during the lapack test: > ## ------- tests of random real and complex matrices ------ > > ## 100 may cause failures here. > eigenok <- function(A, E, Eps=1000*.Machine$double.eps) + { + V <- E$vect; lam <- E$values +

Full_Name: Mike Pacey Version: 2.6.0 OS: SuSe Linux 9.3 x86_64 Submission from: (NULL) (194.80.32.10) A "vanilla" version of R configures and compiles without a problem on my system. Switching to using the PGI compiler configures correctly (see the values at the bottom fo thismessage), but compilation aborts with: pgcc -I../../src/extra/zlib -I../../src/extra/bzip2

Well, CentOS 5.3, which amounts to the same thing. I recently decided to upgrade my main research machine from Fedora Core 8 -> CentOS 5.3. Basically, I was looking to move to a distro with longer 'term-of-life' than the release schedule for Fedora currently allows. The machine is a multi-Opteron box, so both 32- and 64-bit apps natively supported. Since I do a lot of 'linear

Quick followup. Confirmed that TCl/Tk are both installed on the machine (they are, in both 32- and 64-bit flavours), as are all tcl and tk-related libs, devel packages, and about everything else I could find. It occurred to me that perhaps the R I compiled isn't 'tcltk' aware. I checked the config.log, and there is some hint that this might be the case. Just before ## File

Normally, I do the following to configure R for compilation on my Opteron box with ACML installed: ./configure --with-tcltk --with-blas="-L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml" However, when I do so, and look at Makeconf, I see BLAS_LIBS = -lblas I thought I would see BLAS_LIBS = -L/opt/acml4.3.0/gfortran64/lib -lacml Why isn't Makeconf picking up the right BLAS_LIBS (or is

Hi All, While attempting to build R-patched using the Portland Group compiler suite on our dual Opteron 250 box running Scyld 29cz5 (based on RH, kernel 2.4.29), I get: make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/andy/Rbuild/R221-pgi/src/library/tools/src' make[5]: Entering directory `/home/andy/Rbuild/R221-pgi/src/library/tools/src' pgcc -I../../../../include -I/include -I/include/CC -fpic

Dear R-devel, [I'm not sure if this is appropriate for R-devel. If not, I'm more than happy to move it to R-help.] As those of you who saw my post on R-help know, I've been trying to build R-patched on a dual Opteron box running Scyld Beowulf, using the PGI 6.1 compilers. The build went fine, but I couldn't get it to pass make check-all. Jennifer Lai, who reported success with

Hi all, Is there a way that I can import R functions into Fortran? Especially, I want to generate random numbers from some not-so-common distributions (e.g. inverted chi square) but did not find any routines written in Fortran that deal with distributions other than uniform and normal. Thanks. Anny [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Fix the mistake for debug exception(#DB), overflow exception(#OF; generated by INTO) and int 3(#BP) instruction emulation. For INTn (CD ib), it should use type 4 (software interrupt). For INT3 (CC; NOT CD ib with ib=3) and INTO (CE; NOT CD ib with ib=4), it should use type 6 (software exception). For other exceptions (#DE, #DB, #BR, #UD, #NM, #TS, #NP, #SS, #GP, #PF, #MF, #AC, #MC, and #XM), it

I'm sorry that I should remove the comment. In fact my question is about the "float (i32)* (float (i32)*)*", why we use this kind of return type instead of just "float (i32)*". Thanks a lot. Hao On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Hao Shen, > >> %4 = call float (i32)* (float (i32)*)* @get_ptr(float (i32)* @a1)

Dear R-devel, Has anyone played with this? http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_2282,00.html <http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_2282,00.html> . I'll probably give it a shot... Best, Andy Andy Liaw, PhD Biometrics Research PO Box 2000, RY33-300 Merck Research Labs Rahway, NJ 07065 mailto:andy_liaw@merck.com

"float (i32)* (float (i32)*)*" is not a return type. According to the description of the 'call' instruction in LLVM Assembly Language Reference Manual (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#i_call) this is a signature of the pointer to function value being invoked (which includes the return type). In your case the full signature is printed because get_ptr returns a pointer to

Changes from v1: - Define new struct hvm_trap to represent information of trap, include instruction length. - Renames hvm_inject_exception to hvm_inject_trap. Then define a couple of wrappers around that function for existing callers, so that their parameter lists actually *shrink*. This series of patches fix the mistake for debug exception(#DB), overflow exception(#OF) and INT3(#BP),