similar to: Result depends on order of factors in unbalanced designs (lme, anova)?

Hi all! I would like to import a matlab or gauss code to R. Could you help me? Bye, Sebasti?n. 2007/6/23, r-help-request en stat.math.ethz.ch <r-help-request en stat.math.ethz.ch>: > Send R-help mailing list submissions to > r-help en stat.math.ethz.ch > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >

Hi. I was wondering if anyone might have some suggestions about how I can overcome a problem of "iteration limit reached without convergence" when fitting a mixed effects model. In this study: Outcome is a measure of heart action Age is continuous (in weeks) Gender is Male or Female (0 or 1) Genotype is Wild type or knockout (0 or 1) Animal is the Animal ID as a factor

Dear R-list members, I've been struggling with the proper setup for analysing my data. I've performed a route choice experiment, in which participants had to make a choice at each junction for the next road. During the experiment they received traffic information, but also encountered two different accidents. They also made trips without accidents. What I'm interested in is to

I have been trying to use lavaan (version 0.4-7) for a simple path model, but the program seems to be computing far less degrees of freedom for my model then it should have. I have 7 variables, which should give (7)(8)/2 = 28 covariances, and hence 28 DF. The model seems to only think I have 13 DF. The code to reproduce the problem is below. Have I done something wrong, or is this something I

I have problem getting the concept of a nested fixed variable into the nlme scheme. I fear the question is very stupid. In the past I had asked this before, and never got a reply (in other cases, the response was within hours). I also checked the S-list, where several similar enquiries of other people are orphaned. We have a cross-over design, where patient are treated two weeks with placebo,

Dear all I encountered strange behaviour of augPred with virtually the same data First I made groupedData object. > mar.g<-groupedData(rutilizace~doba|int, data=mar) When I perform nlme on complete dataset I get an error with augPred > fit<-nlsList(rutilizace~SSasymp(doba, Asym, R0, lrc), data=mar.g) Warning message: c("1 error caught in nls(y ~ cbind(1 - exp(-exp(lrc) * x),

Hallo! I have data of the following design: NSubj were measured at Baseline (visit 1) and at 3 following time points (visit 2, visit 3, visit 4). There is or is not a treatment. Most interesting is the question if there is a difference in treatment between the results of visit 4 and baseline. (The other time points are also of interest.) The level of significance is alpha=0.0179 (because of an

Hi Well, yes I tried it about two weeks ago but my post did not get through as it still awaits moderator approval. I could check which column is offending but actually it is only minor nuisance, I can live with selection of columns before fitting a model. What seems to me strange is that both full dataset and only selected colums gave me identical fit results but only one works within augPred.

Better posted on r-sig-mixed-models , no? Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:17 AM, PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> wrote: > Dear all > > I encountered strange

> On Aug 23, 2017, at 8:08 AM, PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> wrote: > > Hi > > Well, yes I tried it about two weeks ago but my post did not get through as it still awaits moderator approval. It got through just fine. It appeared on Aug 15. It just didn't get any replies. As I read your original question in this thread, it was not clear to me that you had

I decided my earlier email on this topic was rather long and wordy; here's a condensed version. I am sitting at a Solaris computer in the US/Pacific timezone. I have a file of data having times that includes the following three values 2002-4-7 1:30:00 GMT 2002-4-7 2:30:00 GMT 2002-4-7 3:30:00 GMT I have not been able to find a way to correctly convert these to either of the POSIX

Hi, I am trying to do logistic regression for data of 104 patients, which have one outcome (yes or no) and 15 variables (9 categorical factors [yes or no] and 6 continuous variables). Number of yes outcome is 25. Twenty-five events and 15 variables mean events per variable is much less than 10. Therefore, I tried to analyze the data with penalized regression method. I would like please some of the

I have asked this question before, and received some suggestions for work-arounds that get the job done--and they are much appreciated. But I would still like to find out if I'm missing something, and whether there is a direct way using POSIXt functions (as.POSIXct, as.POSIXlt, strptime, in particular). I have environmental data collected once per minute. Here is a subset of 3 input

You also need to reply-all so the mailing list stays in the loop. -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. On December 19, 2017 4:00:29 PM PST, Timothy Axberg <axbergtimothy at gmail.com> wrote: >Sorry about that. Here is the code typed directly on the email. > >qe = (Qmax * Kl * ce) / (1 + Kl * ce) > >##The data >ce <- c(15.17, 42.15, 69.12, 237.7, 419.77)

Hey, I have stacked a couple of garchFit objects in a list with names $fit1, $fit2, ..., $fiti assigning objects names using a loop, i.e. after running the loop modelStack = list($fit1, $fit2,...,$fiti). Thus the following apply; a = modelStack$fit2, then a is the second garchFit object of formal class 'fGarch' with 11 slots, @call, @formula... etc. I then want to extract information in

Hi, I've got a microarray dataset (Illumina) coming from a blood assay with a case-control factor of interest. I also have several other covariates (gender, weight, etc...). I know that the experimental design is highly unbalanced with respect to Gender: female male control 12 7 case 7 17 Therefore, if there is a Gender effect, then it really

I stumbled across a mild glitch when trying to compare the result of gam() fitting with the result of lm() fitting. The following code demonstrates the problem: library(gam) x <- rep(1:10,10) set.seed(42) y <- rnorm(100) fit1 <- lm(y~x) fit2 <- gam(y~lo(x)) fit3 <- lm(y~factor(x)) print(anova(fit1,fit2)) # No worries. print(anova(fit1,fit3)) # Likewise. print(anova(fit2,fit3)) #

Hi, I am computing the Nelson-Aalen (NA) estimate of baseline cumulative hazard in two different ways using the "survival" package. I am expecting that they should be identical. However, they are not. Their difference is a monotonically increasing with time. This difference is probably not large to make any impact in the application, but is annoyingly non-trivial for me to just

Hello all, I wish to extract the terms from an rpart object. Specifically, I would like to be able to know what is the response variable (so I could do some manipulation on it). But in general, such a method for rpart will also need to handle a "." case (see fit2) Here are two simple examples: fit1 <- rpart(Kyphosis ~ Age + Number + Start, data=kyphosis) fit1$call fit2 <-

Should I repost the question with reply-all? On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Jeff Newmiller <jdnewmil at dcn.davis.ca.us> wrote: > You also need to reply-all so the mailing list stays in the loop. > -- > Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. > > On December 19, 2017 4:00:29 PM PST, Timothy Axberg < > axbergtimothy at gmail.com> wrote: > >Sorry about