similar to: Problem while working with SPSS data

On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:59 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, heisenbug wrote: > > What about "inventing" pseudo-constants (which point to the right > > thing) and build the piece of IR with them. When done, grab mutex and > > RAUW it in. Alternatively, submit to a privileged thread that performs > > the RAUW. > > The trick is to

If I understand correctly, for contributors without commit rights, the new patches "path" is 1) local work 2) local git 3) contributor github fork 4) official github fork 2016-02-25 0:01 GMT+02:00 Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > #3) Contributors without commit rights need to set up a fork (really a > "git clone") on GitHub, and

Am 24.02.2016 um 21:57 schrieb Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev: > For all of these reasons, and also because I'd like to see how well (or > rather, how poorly) a service like GitHub actually works for the project, > it seems like splitting the test-suite out of the current subversion > repository and moving it there is the right call. My experience from a few years of contributing

Hello, I''m quite new to Rails and english is even not my first language, so please excused nescience and clerical mistake. I''ll try to explain my problem as good as possible. I try to implement a page where a profil is shown, this is searched by ID. within this profil page I want to include the comments that refer to this profil. In the back I have to database tabels, the one

Hi, I'm new to R, and I'm STATA user before, could you help me where I can get document about comparison command between STATA and R. Thank you very much, Best regards, -iip-

Hello, all. I've got a problem where we set up call pickup for a customer. If the Bob's extension rings and Bob is in Jim's office, Bob can press the button on his Snom 320 that says "Bob" and pick up his line. It works great for calls coming in from the outside but does not work for internal calls. Internal calls generate a app_directed_pickup.c:204 pickup_exec: No

Dear list, I'm looking for a function to generate (simulate) a random Weibull point process. Can anyone help? Cheers, Torbj?rn Ergon, University of Oslo

Hi, I just came across this box [0] (McKay Creek). Seems to be exceptional building material for ZFS based NAS/iSCSI unit. I especially liked the two extra system disks hidden inside the box ! Any one have an experience with these ? [0] http://www.intel.com/design/servers/storage/ssr212mc2 -- Regards, Cyril

On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, heisenbug wrote: > What about "inventing" pseudo-constants (which point to the right > thing) and build the piece of IR with them. When done, grab mutex and > RAUW it in. Alternatively, submit to a privileged thread that performs > the RAUW. > The trick is to prepare the def/use chain(s) to a degree that the > mutex is only held a minimal

Did you mean non-secular? Otherwise what sect is it? -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org <centos-bounces at centos.org> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Sent: Fri Nov 30 14:22:04 2007 Subject: Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5] On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:39:01AM -0800, Robert - elists alleged:

Hi, I''m trying to create a method to return a random date within a range. So far, I''ve come up with this... require ''parsedate'' def random_date (a, b) adate = ParseDate.parsedate(a) bdate = ParseDate.parsedate(b) atime = Time.local(*adate) btime = Time.local(*bdate) atime + (rand * (atime - btime) ) end ...and it doesn''t seem to

On 3 Nov., 10:06, Chris Lattner <clatt... at apple.com> wrote: > On Nov 2, 2008, at 2:20 PM, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote: > > > I am interested in making my LLVM front-end multi-threaded in a way > > similar to the GCC compiler server proposal and was wondering about   > > the > > extent that the LLVM passes support it. > > Do you have a link for this?

Hello, I'm trying to do bar plot where 'sex' will be the category axis and 'occupation' will represent the bars and the clusters will represent the mean 'income'. sex occupation income 1 female j 12 2 male b 34 3 male j 22 4 female j 54 5 male b 33 6

> > 2. Now that I've written /HowTos/Xen/NvidiaWithXen, how does one > > get it added to the table of contents/indexes? From wiki.centos.org, > > Basically say "I'm done". I'll add it then. To answer your other mail: > With more contributions, normally elevation to the "EditGroup" > happens. Those still cannot change ACLs, but can edit

I've got a Samba 2.2.7a domain with an LDAP backend. It's been working for nearly 3 months now without much bother. By the way: Great work and thanks for all of the effort! I have been missing one minor thing from the setup since I moved away from NT 4: Password Expiration. In the past I have posted questions about this on the list and I've gotten two answers: "Wait for

Folks, I have a dataframe comprising a column of dates and a column of signals (-1, 0, 1) that looks something like this: 30/01/2007 0 31/01/2007 -1 01/02/2007 -1 02/02/2007 -1 03/02/2007 1 04/02/2007 1 05/02/2007 1 06/02/2007 1 07/02/2007 1 08/02/2007 1 09/02/2007 0 10/02/2007 0 11/02/2007 0 12/02/2007 1 13/02/2007 1 14/02/2007 1 15/02/2007 0 16/02/2007 0 What I need to do is for each signal

On Nov 6, 4:22 am, Jonathan Brandmeyer <jbrandme... at earthlink.net> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-11-03 at 23:59 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 3, 2008, at 3:55 PM, heisenbug wrote: > > > What about "inventing" pseudo-constants (which point to the right > > > thing) and build the piece of IR with them. When done, grab mutex and > > > RAUW it

I have a Samba 2.2.7a PDC (with an OpenLDAP backend) that seems to be giving me trouble. Here's the scoop: I have Windows 2000 Pro clients running Word 2000. Over the past several days, a lot of them have had trouble with their documents - most of the time during a save. The most critical of these failures presents the following error message when saving: "Word has lost data due to a

Subject kinda says it all. Here is my rationale: The test-suite is really weird relative to the rest of the LLVM project: 1) It contains all manner of crazily licensed code. 2) We don't really care about the history at all. Any concerns around linear history or bisection are pretty much irrelevant. 3) We don't ever plan to have LLVM code move into or out from the test-suite 4) Its already

Hi, first of all I will apologize in advance for my presumably noobish question, but I''m only starting to learn Rails and am a little confused with all the changes in 2.0.1. There are as good as no tutorials out yet and the 2 or 3 screencasts I''ve seen deal with the creation of both the app and the database. Now my problem is that I already have a database with a fair amount of