Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Problem with installing Hmisc and Design: gfrotran: error"
2008 Oct 31
5
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
Chris and Bill,
I have tested the proposed patch from...
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-August/016490.html
under i686-apple-darwin9 and it solves the problems building gfortran
from llvm svn. The resulting compiler works fine so can we get that
patch in before 2.4 is release?
Jack
ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm
svn. I find
2008 Oct 31
3
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm
>> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that
>> I get a series of warning messages...
>>
>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/
2008 Oct 31
1
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 05:38:30PM -0700, Bill Wendling wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.msbb.uc.edu> wrote:
> > Chris and Bill,
> > I have tested the proposed patch from...
> >
> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-August/016490.html
> >
> > under i686-apple-darwin9 and it solves the problems
2008 Oct 31
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.msbb.uc.edu> wrote:
> Chris and Bill,
> I have tested the proposed patch from...
>
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-August/016490.html
>
> under i686-apple-darwin9 and it solves the problems building gfortran
> from llvm svn. The resulting compiler works fine so can we get that
> patch
2008 Oct 31
0
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm
> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that
> I get a series of warning messages...
>
> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/
> ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
> f951: warning: command line option
2006 Nov 25
2
[LLVMdev] f95 problem with SPEC2K
Anyone know what to do about this:
make[4]: Leaving directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/CFP2000/173.applu'
make[4]: Entering directory `/proj/llvm/llvm-test-1/External/SPEC/CFP2000/178.galgel'
/usr/bin/f95 -w -S -O2 /opt/spec/CPU2000v1.3.1/benchspec//CFP2000/178.galgel/src/modules.f90 -o modules.c -fixed -kind=byte -dcfuns -dusty
f95: unrecognized option '-kind=byte'
2009 Jan 19
5
[LLVMdev] llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 svn still produces -Wformat/-Wformat-security
The current llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 svn when built on
i686-apple-darwin9 still produces the bogus warnings...
f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat-security" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
whenc compling any code with gfortran. This causes the gfortran
2008 Oct 31
1
[LLVMdev] r57326 malfunctions?
Looking back through the commits to llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/config/i386/darwin.h,
I see a total backout of format related warnings in r56923 followed by the reapplication of
r569065 with a fix (r56946)...
-- llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/config/i386/darwin.h 2008/10/01 17:38:40 56923
+++ llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/config/i386/darwin.h 2008/10/02 06:16:08 56946
@@ -101,6 +101,8 @@
%{!mmacosx-version-min=*:
2010 Oct 06
2
[LLVMdev] dragonegg vs -ffast-math?
I am finding that llvm 2.8 rc3 with dragonegg svn built against current
gcc-4_5-branch doesn't appear to allow gfortran to use -ffast-math. Attempting
to compile code using the dragonegg plugin under gcc 4.5.2 with that option produces the error...
f951: Unknown command line argument '--enable-finite-only-fp-math'. Try: 'f951 -help'
The standard gcc 4.5.2 gfortran compiler
2006 Jun 20
3
Create variables with common values for each group
Dear all,
sorry, this is for sure really basic, but I searched a lot in the
internet, and just couldn't find a solution.
The problem is to create new variables from a data frame which
contains both individual and group variables, such as mean age for an
household. My data frame:
df
hhid h.age
1 10010020 23
2 10010020 23
3 10010126 42
4 10010126 60
5 10010142
2010 Oct 06
0
[LLVMdev] dragonegg vs -ffast-math?
Hi Jack,
> I am finding that llvm 2.8 rc3 with dragonegg svn built against current
> gcc-4_5-branch doesn't appear to allow gfortran to use -ffast-math. Attempting
> to compile code using the dragonegg plugin under gcc 4.5.2 with that option produces the error...
>
> f951: Unknown command line argument '--enable-finite-only-fp-math'. Try: 'f951 -help'
>
2009 Jan 19
0
[LLVMdev] llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 svn still produces -Wformat/-Wformat-security
Hi Jack,
Because of the new changes and the fact that we have only 2 days
before branching for 2.5, please retest the Fortran front end as soon
as you can to see if the problem has been resolved.
Thanks!
-bw
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> The current llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 svn when built on
> i686-apple-darwin9 still produces the
2012 May 05
1
f951.exe: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled
Hello:
Under my Windows 7 system, "R CMD check
DiercxkSpline_1.1-5.tar.gz" fails because:
f951.exe: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in
make: *** [bispev.o] Error 1
gfortran -m64 -O2 -mtune=core2 -c bispev.f -o bispev.o
f951.exe: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in
make: *** [bispev.o] Error 1
ERROR: compilation failed for package
2010 Jun 02
3
R linux install: FORTRAN compiling error
Hello,
I have basic familiarity with Unix but by most standards a novice. I am
trying to install R on a linux machine and am following the instructions in
the R install and admin guide in terms of what is required to compile the R
source code. I downloaded R version 2.11.1 and extracted the files into my
home directory. I realize I need a FORTRAN compiler to help with this
process and have
2012 May 10
1
Problems with 64bit dll compile in R-2.15.0
I built my package under the R version 2.14.1 on windows without any
problems by first checking for issues using R CMD check (no warnings) and
then R CMD build to build the tar.gz. I can install this on version
2.14.1 using install.packages(...). I next tested to see if I could also
install on version 2.15.0 (also on my computer) using install.packages()
with the version 2.14.1 tar.gz this
2009 Aug 15
1
System is computationally singular and scale of covariates
Dear all,
I'm running a self-written numerical optimization routine (hazard
model) which includes computing the inverse of the outer product of
the score. I have been getting the above error message ("System is
computationally singular"), and after some tweaking, I realized that
these variables have some high numbers and the problem could be
circumvented by scaling them down (i.e.
2006 Jul 04
1
using weights in lrm
Dear all,
just a quick question regarding weights in logistic regression. I do
results <- lrm(y.js ~
h.hhsize
+ h.death1
+ h.ill1
+ h.ljob1
+ h.fin1
+ h.div1
+ h.fail1
+ h.sex
+ h.ch.1
2008 Aug 11
5
[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn
The curent llvm svn (r54623) is unable to link the gfortran
compiler in llvm-gcc-4.2 svn. I am getting the error...
c++ -g -O2 -mdynamic-no-pic -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -mdynamic-no-pic -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o f951 \
2006 Sep 09
1
[LLVMdev] gfortran: link error building gfortran on linux
Hi, in trying to build an llvm-gfortran on linux from today's gcc4
SVN, I get the following link errors that didn't show up on OS X. This
is also using LLVM CVS from this morning.
They appear to mostly be related to CodeWarrior compatibility code,
but a couple are less obvious.
What's the best way to fix this? I'm stuck without my powerbook for at
least three weeks and I'd
2009 Jan 19
2
Using apply to generate matrix from rows?
Dear all,
I have a simple question which I unfortunately do not seem to be able
to solve myself. I have a (NxK) matrix and want to generate a new
matrix by multiplying each row with itself such that the new matrix
has dimension ((N*K)xK) (or better, generate an array with dimension
(K,K,N)). I tried apply, but that did not work. Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Stephan
## Here is a simple