similar to: Sum of Bernoullis with varying probabilities

Dear developeRs, I encounter the following problem: in the current version of my package FrF2, certain calls to a functioni do not work when package combinat is loaded, because function combn from combinat masks the function from utils that my package uses. I tried to solve this issue by importing function combn into the namespace of FrF2; I don't need to export it, I just want to use it

I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections: arguments seealso examples If instead I convert to .d (below), the same sections are missing, and the "note" section is included but without the necessary newline.

It seems people are reinventing the wheel here: The goal is to generate all combinations of 1:n of size k. This (typically) results in a matrix of size k * choose(n,k) i.e. needs O(n ^ k) space, hence is only applicable to relatively small k. Then alternatives have been devised to generate the combinations "one by one", and I think I remember there has been a quiz/challenge about 20

Hi The message occurred from R, when I was selected of "optimization > block diagonal Fhiser matrix" and used the attached file on PFIM. Could you please advise me about the following message? ***************************** Loading required pakage: combinat Attaching package:'combinat' The following object(s) are masked from 'package:utils':combn

Hello all, I am trying to create a matrix of 1s and -1s without any repetitions for a specified number of columns. e.g. 1s and -1s for 3 columns can be done uniquely in 2^3 ways. -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 -1 -1 1 1 1 -1 -1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 1 1 1 and for 4 columns in 2^4 ways and so on. I finally used the function combn([0 1],3) that I found at the following link

Dear UseRs, MY PROBLEM IS A SMALL PIECE OF A REAL BIG AND A COMPLICATED PROBLEM. IF I DELIBERATE IN A VERY SIMPLE WAY THEN ALL I WANT IS TO PUT ALL THE POSSIBLE COMBINATIONS OF 75 DISTANCE MATRICES (BY TAKING 4 MATRICES, MORE COMMONLY 75C4), in the following equation. t<-as.matrix((MAT1)^2+(MAT2)^2+(MAT3)^2+(MAT4)^2+,upper=T,diag=T)) Then "1215450" values of "t"(one for

Respected All, I hope you are enjoying good health, I am tring to write a program in R but could not be very sucessful. My program draws random sample form bivariate normal distribution and then compute a variable PIJ. For certian samples some entries of variable PIJ is apearing as negative, which result in negative variance estimator. I want to introduce a loop in my program that verify the each

Dear R-helpers, I'm trying to develop a function which specifies all possible expressions that can be formed using a certain number of variables. For example, with three variables A, B and C we can have - presence/absence of A; B and C - presence/absence of combinations of two of them - presence/absence of all three A B C 1 0 2 1 3 0 4 1 5 0 6 1

Hi, I am trying to use a vector of indices to select some rows from a matrix. But before I can do that I somehow need to convert 'combinations' into a list, since 'mode(combinations)' says it's 'numerical'. Any idea how I can do that? library("combinat") combinations <- t(combn(8,2)) indices <- c(sample(1:length(combinations),10)) # convert ???

I have a problem where I need to loop over the total combinations of vectors (combined once chosen via combinatorics). Here is a simplification of the problem: STEP 1: Define three vectors a, b, c. STEP 2: Combine all possible pairwise vectors (i.e., 3 choose 2 = 3 possible pairs of vectors: ab,ac, bc) NOTE: the actual problem has 8 choose 4, 8 choose 5 and 8 choose 6 combinations. STEP

On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 timh at insightful.com wrote: > I've created a .Rd file (below), then converted that to .sgml using > R CMD Rdconv --type=Ssgm combn.Rd > combn.sgml > The output (shown below) is missing some of the sections: > arguments > seealso > examples > If instead I convert to .d (below), the same sections are missing, > and the "note"

Let say, I have a matrix with 8 rows and 6 columns:  >  df1  <- matrix(NA, 8, 4)  > df1       [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4]  [1,]   NA   NA   NA   NA  [2,]   NA   NA   NA   NA  [3,]   NA   NA   NA   NA  [4,]   NA   NA   NA   NA  [5,]   NA   NA   NA   NA  [6,]   NA   NA   NA   NA  [7,]   NA   NA   NA   NA  [8,]   NA   NA   NA   NA  Now I want to get **all possible** ways to fetch 6 cells at a

Hola Miguel, Sí se pueden obtener las variaciones con y sin repetición en R. Eso sí están un poco escondidas... Se pueden calcular de esta forma: #---------------------- > #Cargar el paquete gtools > library(gtools) > #Definir el conjunto sobre el que se hará el cálculo > x <- c('rojo', 'azul', 'verde') > #Utilizar la función "permutations()"

Hi, i am working on a problem where i need to compute the products of all possible combinations of size m of the elements of a vector. I know that this can be achieved using the function combn(), e.g.: > vector <- 1:6 > combn(x = vector, m = 3, FUN = function(y) prod(y)) In my case the vector has 2000 elements and i need to compute the values specified above for m = 32. Using combn() i

Hi, anyone interested in this: I tried to simply this loop with lapply or something but haven't figured it out: mapt = c("203929_s_at", "203930_s_at", "203928_x_at", "206401_s_at") mapt.combn <- lapply(1:4, function(i) combn(mapt, i)) out = list() k = 1 for (i in 1:length(mapt.combn)){ for (j in 1:ncol(mapt.combn[[i]])){ out[[k]] =

Hola buenos días, me presento, me llamo Miguel y 'soy de' y 'vivo en' Galicia. Soy profesor de secundaria (Bachillerato Adultos) y llevo 15 días estudiando R a un buen ritmo, pero todavía me faltan miles de cosas. He visto que R facilita, no solo el análisis de datos y que posee una potencia en cálculos estadísticos a cualquier nivel, sino gran caudal de recursos para Data Mining,

I have data.frame's with IDs and multiple columns. B/c some of IDs showed up more than once, I need sum up colum values to creat a new dataframe with unique ids. I hope there are some cheaper ways of doing it... Because the dataframe is huge, it takes almost an hour to do the task. Thanks so much in advance! Young # ------------------------- examples are here and sum.dup.r is at the

Dear All, I have a dataframe made up of individual beetles consisting of individual number, family number, mother's family number, father's family number, and sex of the beetle. I would like to pair up the individuals for breeding. I would, however, like to avoid breeding beetles of the same sex (obviously), the same family, and with the same mother's family or father's family,

Hi List, I'm hoping to get opinions for enhancing the efficiency of the following code designed to take a vector of probabilities (outcomes) and calculate a union of the probability space. As part of the union calculation, combn() must be used, which returns a matrix, and the parallelized version of lapply() provided in the multicore package requires a list. I've found that

Sí, también... Para las permutaciones, n=r. Y con el parámetro "repeats.allowed" controlas si son con o sin repetción: #---------------------- > #Permutaciones *con repetición* > permutations(n=3, r=3, v=x, repeats.allowed=TRUE) [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] "azul" "azul" "azul" [2,] "azul" "azul" "rojo" [3,]