Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "glmmPQL: Na/NaN/Inf in foreign function call"
2006 Jan 10
1
glmmPQL / "system is computationally singular"
Hi,
I'm having trouble with glmmPQL from the MASS package.
I'm trying to fit a model with a binary response variable, two fixed
and two random variables (nested), with a sample of about 200,000
data points.
Unfortunately, I'm getting an error message that is difficult to
understand without knowing the internals of the glmmPQL function.
> model <- glmmPQL(primed ~
2007 Oct 11
3
lme4 install trouble
After upgrading to R 2.6.0, I'm having trouble running lmer:
model <- lmer(primed ~ log(dist.time)*role + 1|target.utt,
data=data.utts)
Error in UseMethod("as.logical") : no applicable method for "as.logical"
So I thought I'd upgrade lme4 to the latest version, but
unfortunately the compilation fails - perhaps there's a missing
#include:
R CMD INSTALL
2003 May 16
0
glmmPQL, NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 3)
Dear all,
I try to fit a glmmPQL on a huge data with 384189 individuals id=1:384189:
working in 1520 establishments est:1:1516. The minimum number of individuals
in every establishment is 30.
This works for a subsample excluding establishemnet cells smaller than 100,
but fail when we include smaller cells:
R> summary(glmmPQL(count ~
+ I( age-ave(age,est) )* ave(age,est) +
+ I(
2006 Jan 30
1
predict.lme / nlmmPQL: "non-conformable arguments"
I'm trying to use "predict" with a linear mixed-effects logistic
regression model fitted with nlmmPQL from the MASS library.
Unfortunately, I'm getting an error "non-conformable arguments" in
predict.lme, and I would like to understand why.
I have used the same call to "predict" with "glm" models without
problems. I assume I'm doing
2008 Jan 20
4
read.table: wrong error message? (PR#10592)
--Apple-Mail-44--797532055
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed;
delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I believe read.table may report misleading errors. In this example,
where a header line in a file has an incorrect number of row names (28
instead of 29), I get the error message "duplicate row.names are not
allowed".
However, I cannot not find any
2005 Aug 03
1
glmmPQL error in logLik.reStruct
Dear R users,
I'm attempting to fit a GLM with random effects using the tweedie family
for the error structure. I'm getting the error:
iteration 1
Error in logLik.reStruct(object, conLin) :
NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 3)
I'm running V2.1.0
I notice from searching the lists that the same error was reported in
May 2004 by Spencer Graves, but no-one was able to
2003 Sep 03
1
glmmPQL probelm
Dear listers,
First let me appologize if the same mail arrives multiple times. Recently I
had some probelms sending my e-mails to the list.
I encountered a problem when running glmmPQL procuedure doing multilevel
modeling with a dichotomous outcome.
Those are the two error messages I usually get:
Error in logLik.reStruct(object, conLin) :
NA/NaN/Inf in foreign function call (arg 3)
2003 May 30
1
Error using glmmPQL
Can anyone shed any light on this?
> doubt.demographic.pql<-glmmPQL(random = ~ 1 | groupid/participantid,
+ fixed = r.info.doubt ~
+ realage + minority + female + education + income + scenario,
+ data = fgdata.df[coded.resource,],
+ na.action=na.omit,
+
2008 Jan 24
0
(lme4: lmer) mcmcsamp: Error in if (var(y) == 0)
I've got a problem with "mcmcsamp" used with glmer objects produced
with "lmer" from the lme4 package.
When calling mcmcsamp, I get the error
Error in if (var(y) == 0) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
This does not occur with all models, but I can't find anything wrong
with the dataset.
If the error is in my data, can someone tell me what I am looking
2010 Apr 29
2
substring comparison
Hi all,
I'm writing a script to do some basic text analysis in R. Let's assume
I have a data frame named data which contains a column named 'utt'
which contains strings. Is there a straightforward way to achieve
something like this:
data$ContainsThe <- ifelse(startsWith(data$Utt,"the"),"y","n")
or
data$ContainsThe <-
2005 Jan 10
2
Festival Woes
Asterisk v1.0 is running on RH 9. I installed festival RPM
(festival-1.4.2-16.i386.rpm) and edited the festival.scm file to add:
(define (tts_textasterisk string mode)
"(tts_textasterisk STRING MODE)
Apply tts to STRING. This function is specifically designed for
use in server mode so a single function call may synthesize the string.
This function name may be added to the server safe
2003 May 28
1
Bradley Terry model and glmmPQL
Dear R-ers,
I am having trouble understanding why I am getting an error using glmmPQL (library MASS).
I am getting the following error:
iteration 1
Error in MEEM(object, conLin, control$niterEM) :
Singularity in backsolve at level 0, block 1
The long story:
I have data from an experiment on pairwise comparisons between 3 treatments (a, b, c). So a typical run of an experiment
2004 May 29
0
glmmPQL:
I'm getting a strange error from glmmPQL. Consider the following
sample code:
set.seed(8)
N. <- 1000
z <- rnorm(N.)
pr.good <- exp(-1e-4*exp(2+2*z))
quantile(pr.good)
DF. <- data.frame(yield=rbinom(N., N., pr.good)/N.,
Offset=rep(-10, N.), nest=1:N.)
fit <- glmmPQL(fixed=1-yield~offset(Offset), random=~1|nest,
family=binomial(link="cloglog"),
2006 Jan 10
0
bug in either glmmPQL or lme/lmer
I know it's conventional to report bugs to the maintainer, but I'm not sure
which package actually contains this bug(s), so I apologize for sending this
to the list at large. I see the bug under both R 2.1.1, and R 2.2.1. (I sent
a related message a while ago, but this one has more detail.)
library(MASS)
library(nlme)
fit.model <- function(il, model.family) {
cs <-
2010 Aug 04
1
Asterisk not working with Festival
Hello,
I am having a Mac 10.6.4 (Snow Leopard). I have compiled and built Asterisk
1.6.2.9 and Festival 2.0.95:beta on my machine. Asterisk is working fine
with SIP channels without Festival. I have written following context in
extension.conf:
[connect-to-me]
exten => s,1,Answer
Exten => s,n,SayDigits(?1?)
exten => s,n,Festival(hello john)
exten => s,n,Hangup
I use call files to
2005 Dec 27
2
glmmPQL and variance structure
Dear listers,
glmmPQL (package MASS) is given to work by repeated call to lme. In the
classical outputs glmmPQL the Variance Structure is given as " fixed
weights, Formula: ~invwt". The script shows that the function
varFixed() is used, though the place where 'invwt' is defined remains
unclear to me. I wonder if there is an easy way to specify another
variance
2003 Apr 22
1
glmmPQL and additive random effects?
I'm a bit puzzled by how to write out additive random effects in
glmmPQL. In my situation, I have a factorial design on two
(categorical) random factors, A and B. At each combination, I have a
binary response, y, and two binary fixed covariates, C and D.
If everything were fixed, I would use
glm(y ~ A + B + C + D, family = binomial)
My first thought was to use
glmmPQL(y ~ A + B, random
2006 Sep 25
1
glmmPQL in 2.3.1
Dear R-help,
I recently tried implementing glmmPQL in 2.3.1, and I discovered a
few differences as compared to 2.2.1. I am fitting a regression with
fixed and random effects with Gamma error structure. First, 2.3.1
gives different estimates than 2.2.1, and 2.3.1, takes more
iterations to converge. Second, when I try using the anova function
it says, "'anova' is not available
2006 Apr 10
1
Weights in glmmPQL
Hello,
I am using the R function glmmPQL to fit a logistic GLMM, with weights.
I am finding that I get fairly different parameter estimates in glmmPQL
from fitting the full dataset (with no "weight" statement) and an
equivalent, shorter dataset with the weights statement. I am using the
weights statement in the 'glmmPQL' function exactly as in the 'glm'
function. I
2006 Feb 10
1
glmmPQL and random effects
Hello R users,
I am trying to run a model with a binary response variable (nesting
success: 0 failure, 1 success) and 8 fixed terms. Nesting success was
examined in 72 cases in 34 territories (TER) during a 6 study years.
Territories are nested within 14 patches (PATCH). I want to run a model
taking into account these nested factors and repeated observation. To do
this, I assume that the best