similar to: change maxiter for nls

Is there anyway to change any y[i] value (i=2,...6) to make following NLS workable? x <- c(0,5,10,15,20,25,30) y <- c(1.00000,0.82000,0.68000,0.64000,0.66667,0.68667,0.64000) lm(1/y ~~ x) nls(1/y ~~ a+b*x^c, start=list(a=1.16122,b=0.01565,c=1), trace=TRUE) #0.0920573 : 1.16122 0.01565 1.00000 #Error in numericDeriv(form[[3]], names(ind), env) : # Missing value or

> y [1] 1 11 42 64 108 173 214 > t [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > nls(1/y ~ c*exp(-a*b*t)+1/b, start=list(a=0.001,b=250,c=5), trace=TRUE) 29.93322 : 0.001 250.000 5.000 Error in numericDeriv(form[[3]], names(ind), env) : Missing value or an infinity produced when evaluating the model # the start value for b is almost close to final estimates, # a is usually

how to realize the following SQL command in R? select distinct A, B, count(C) from TABLE group by A, B ; quit; Best Regards --------------------------------- Sponsored Link Get a free Motorola Razr! Today Only! Choose Cingular, Sprint, Verizon, Alltel, or T-Mobile. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

How to obtain the FUNCTION for the following smooth curve? x 0 100 250 500 1000 4000 y 1.8 1.2 1.02 0.99 0.97 0.85 Thanks, SJ --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello, I'm using the nls function and would like to increase the number of iterations. According to the documentation as well as other postings on R-help, I've tried to do this using the "control" argument: nls(y ~ SSfpl(x, A, B, xmid, scal), data=my.data, control=nls.control(maxiter=200)) but no matter how much I increase "maxiter", I get the following error

How to convert the following ms() in Splus to Optim in R? The "Calc" function is also attached. ms(~ Calc(a.init, B, v, off, d, P.a, lambda.a, P.y, lambda.y, 10^(-8), FALSE, 20, TRUE)$Bic, start = list(lambda.a = 0.5, lambda.y = 240), control = list(maxiter = 10, tol = 0.1)) Calc <- function(A.INIT., X., V., OFF., D., P1., LAMBDA1., P2., LAMBDA2., TOL., MONITOR.,

I'm a bit confused about the nls package, I'm trying to use it for curve fitting. First off, the documentation for nls says ``see `nlsControl' for the names of the settable control values'' -- this is wrong, it should be nls.control (minor point but had me confused for a moment). Now I'll try something very simple (maybe too simple):

Dear friends. I use nls() and encounter the following puzzling problem: I have a function f(a,b,c,x), I have a data vector of x and a vectory y of realized value of f. Case1 I tried to estimate c with (a=0.3, b=0.5) fixed: nls(y~f(a,b,c,x), control=list(maxiter = 100000, minFactor=0.5 ^2048),start=list(c=0.5)). The error message is: "number of iterations exceeded maximum of

Dear All, I may look ridiculous, but I am puzzled at the behavior of the nls with a fitting I am currently dealing with. My data are: x N 1 346.4102 145.428256 2 447.2136 169.530634 3 570.0877 144.081627 4 721.1103 106.363316 5 894.4272 130.390552 6 1264.9111 36.727069 7 1788.8544 52.848587 8 2449.4897 25.128742 9 3464.1016 7.531766 10 4472.1360 8.827367 11

Hi, I have some data I want to fit with a non-linear function using nls, but it won't solve. > regresjon<-nls(lcfu~lN0+log10(1-(1-10^(k*t))^m), data=cfu_data, > start=(list(lN0 = 7.6, k = -0.08, m = 2))) Error in nls(lcfu ~ lN0 + log10(1 - (1 - 10^(k * t))^m), data = cfu_data, : step factor 0.000488281 reduced below 'minFactor' of 0.000976562 Tried to increase minFactor

The documentation for nls says the following about the starting values: start: a named list or named numeric vector of starting estimates. Since R 2.4.0, when 'start' is missing, a very cheap guess for 'start' is tried (if 'algorithm != "plinear"'). It may be a good idea to document that when algorithm = "port", if start is a named

Dear Friends. I tried to use nls.control() to change the 'minFactor' in nls( ), but it does not seem to work. I used nls( ) function and encountered error message "step factor 0.000488281 reduced below 'minFactor' of 0.000976563". I then tried the following: 1) Put "nls.control(minFactor = 1/(4096*128))" inside the brackets of nls, but the same error message

Hello, I can`t figure out how can increase the velocity of the fitting data by nls. I have a long data .csv I want to read evry time the first colunm to the other colunm and analisy with thata tools setwd("C:/dati") a<-read.table("Normalizzazione.csv", sep=",", dec=".", header=F) for (i in 1:dim(a[[2]]]) { #preparazione dati da analizzare

Hello. I have a script in which I repeatedly fit a nonlinear regression to a series of data sets using nls and the port algorithm from within a loop. The general structure of the loop is: for(i in 1:n){ … extract relevant vectors of dependent and independent variables … … estimate starting values for Amax and Q.LCP…

x<-c(-1.873....,-0.121) # 23 numerics; x.arma12 <- armaFit(x ~ arma(1,2)) #estimates y[t]= -0.11465 - 0.23767 y[t-1] - 0.14230 e[t-1] -0.85770 e[t-2] + e[t]; # ? how to predict 46 steps ahead based on 23 data points? # the following doesn't work since n is in armaSim rather than armaFit; predict(x.arima12, n.ahead=46) # Thanks ---------------------------------

Hello colleagues, I am attempting to determine the nonlinear least-squares estimates of the nonlinear model parameters using nls. I have come across a common problem that R users have reported when I attempt to fit a particular 3-parameter nonlinear function to my dataset: Error in nls(r ~ tlm(a, N.fix, k, theta), data = tlm.data, start = list(a = a.st, : step factor 0.000488281

Hello R-gurus, I'm trying to adjust different growth curves to a rather extensive dataset. I wrote up a function to go through all of them, but am encountering a problem : among the more than 1000 curves I have, obviously for some of them I encounter conversion problems. I'd like for my function to keep going to the next curve and store the fact that for curve number X I had a convergence

Hi, I am using the nls function and it stops because the number of iterations exceeded 50, but i used the nls.control argument to allow for 500 iterations. Do you have any idea why it's not working? fm1 <- nls(npe ~ SSgompertz(npo, Asym, b2, b3), data=f,control=nls.control(maxiter=500)) Thanks for your help, Cheers, Karine.

I'm having problems getting nls to agree that convergence has occurred in a toy problem. nls.out never gets defined when there is an error in nls. Reaching the maximum number of iterations is alway an error, so nls.out never gets defined when the maximum number of iterations is reched. >From ?nls.control: tol: A positive numeric value specifying the tolerance level for the

Dear list, I do have a problem with nls. I use the following data: >test time conc dose 0.50 5.40 1 0.75 11.10 1 1.00 8.40 1 1.25 13.80 1 1.50 15.50 1 1.75 18.00 1 2.00 17.00 1 2.50 13.90 1 3.00 11.20 1 3.50 9.90 1 4.00 4.70 1 5.00 5.00 1 6.00 1.90 1 7.00 1.90 1 9.00 1.10 1 12.00 0.95 1 14.00