Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "How do I subset a dataframe"
2010 Feb 12
1
Assign Name of Data Frame
Hello R Experts,
How can I assign the name of a data frame with the argument of a
function? Specifically I am using RODBC to build local dataframes
from SAS datasets on a
remote server. I would like the local dataframe have the same name as
the source SAS dataset, and the function below is what I am
developing. However, the "substitute(table)" on the left side of the
assignment
2015 Jan 22
3
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
Is that even a valid instruction? I thought TEST only took 32-bit immediates.
Fiona
> On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:48 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The problem is that REX TEST reg,#(1<<37) is 10 bytes vs 5 bytes for REX BT reg,37.
> That's a large space penalty to pay for a possible partial update stall.
>
> So the idea of generating BT for
2015 Jan 22
3
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
Yeah, the alternative is to do movabs and then test, which is doable but I’m not sure if it’s worth it (surely BT + risk of flags merging penalty has to be better than two ops, one of which is ~9-10 bytes).
Fiona
> On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:59 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> My bad on that. So that's what the comment meant.
> That means BT is pretty much
2015 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
On Thu Jan 22 2015 at 3:32:53 PM Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote:
> The status quo is:
>
> a) 40b REX+BT instruction for the 64b case
> b) 48b TEST for the 32b case
> c) unless it's small TEST
>
>
> You are currently paying a 16b penalty for TEST vs BT in the 32b case.
> That may be worth testing the -Os flag.
>
You'll want -Oz here, Os
2015 Feb 03
3
[LLVMdev] RFC: Constant Hoisting
Hi Chris,
If you have everything setup to test, can you generate the LLVM IR with -03 from 3.4.1 and 3.5 to be sure they match. Then we can focus on the backend.
Thanks,
Mehdi
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 1:58 AM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So between 3.4.1 and 3.5 since it isn't in 3.4.1 and it is in the current XCode.
-------------- next part
2015 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
> On Jan 22, 2015, at 1:22 PM, Fiona Glaser <fglaser at apple.com> wrote:
>
> According to Agner’s docs, many CPUs have slower BT than TEST; Haswell has only 0.5 inverse throughput as opposed to 0.25, Atom has 1 instead of 0.5, and Silvermont can’t even dual-issue BT (it locks both ALUs). So while BT does seem have a shorter instruction encoding than TEST for TEST reg, imm32 where
2015 Jan 23
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
I suspect that this is because the mask in your example is the result of a variable shift, which (a) has it’s own performance and flags hazards pre-SHLX and (b) requires additional µops to do with TEST. I expect that ICC is putting a dummy TEST or XOR ahead of the BT to break the false flags dependency, as well.
If the mask were constant, I expect ICC would generate TEST instead (but I don’t
2015 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
That’s not how partial-flags update stalls work. There is no independent tracking of individual bits in EFLAGS. This means that BT + CMOVNZ has a false dependency on whatever instruction wrote to EFLAGS before BT and requires an extra µop vis-a-vis TEST + CMOVNZ or SHR + AND.
Please do not use BT. It is a performance hazard. If you don’t believe me for some reason, here’s the relevant quote
2005 Mar 16
3
NuFone and CallerID
Hey Everyone,
I am using NuFone for 866 inbound service and I am trying to figure out
the callerid part of it. Any call into my * system just shows "Toll Free
Call" and will not give me the calling party's caller ID info.
Is this just something I have to live with using NuFOne, or did I miss
some type of config in * that will grab the callerID other than the
inbound 866 number...?
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
Sure. Attached is the file but here are the functions. The first uses a
fixed bit offset. The second has a indexed bit offset. Compiling with llc
-O3, LLVM version 3.7.0svn, it compiles the IR from IsBitSetB() using btq %rsi,
%rdi. Good. But then it compiles IsBitSetA() with shrq/andq, which is is
pretty much what Clang had generated as IR.
shrq $25, %rdi
andq $1, %rdi
LLVM should be able to
2005 Feb 25
1
WebVMail Woirks but No Audio
Hi Everyone -
I have webvmail up and running, I can see the messages, forward them,
pretty much everything but listen to them.
Here is what I see in my logs:
192.168.0.1 - - [25/Feb/2005:08:15:40 -0800] "GET
/vmail/vmail.cgi?action=audio&folder=INBOX&mailbox=2377&context=default
&password=000012&msgid=0000&format=gsm&dontcasheme=4624.gsm HTTP/1.1"
200 9438
2005 Feb 14
2
ztdummy on Gentoo 2.6.10 Box
Hi Everyone,
I read through the list on the issues with the ztdummy driver which I
need for MeetMe, but I seem to have come across a problem that I cannot
seem to find an answer for.
I am running Gentoo 2.6.10 on an Intel box.
I have read the the wiki entries on the ztdummy and followed the
instructions as they relate to the 2.6 kernel.
Everything compiled great, but a modprobe ztdummy
2003 Feb 04
1
pulling tree : semantics problem
Hi,
I'm trying to pull my home from a remote machine.
I get a error
'failed to set permissions on home : Not owner'
which is obvious:
rsync -a remote:/home/foo/bar/zee /
this create /home/foo/bar/zee here , but give above error
I don't own /,/home but i own /home/foo/bar and lower.
If i tell rsync to:
rsync -a remote:/home/foo/bar/zee /home/foo/bar
it creates
2005 Feb 15
14
X-Lite Softphone
Hey Everyone,
I downloaded and installed the X-Lite softphone the other day (the lite
version) and cannot seem to get it to work well.
Don't get me wrong, it registers with my asterisk server and everything
seems to work well, except the call quality really is horrible.
I thought it may be the place I was trying it at (DSL) so I took it to
the office and tried it right next to the asterisk
2015 Jan 23
3
[LLVMdev] X86TarIgetLowering::LowerToBT
I’ll be happy to run it for you. Do you want Intel64, x86 or both? The Intel compiler doesn’t have a –Oz option. It has –Os and –O[123].
Also, FWIW, one of the Intel compiler experts on BT will comment on this thread, and on our rules for BT usage later this afternoon.
Kevin B. Smith
From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Sears
Sent:
2006 Jul 21
1
cmusieve plugin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys
I have been doing a lot of searching, but maybe I am being dim (not
unheard of!).
I have dovecot-1.0rc2 built and running on Fedora Core 5.
The wiki page (dated yesterday) states that I need the cmusieve plugin
to use sieve scripts with the dovecot lda. Is this a new development?
They seem to work quite happily on my soon-to-be retired
2007 Jun 10
1
Setup problems, /dev/net/tun FD in bad state
Hi all, I'm following the manual but I get the below error, and I
believe tinc is clobbering my conf file.
I've never set up VPN before, I'm just trying to connect to my work
network from home. All the following is on my work computer. Thanks in
advance for any help.
$ ifconfig eth0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1A:A0:17:3A:50
inet addr:172.24.104.145
2005 Feb 24
2
Delay after entering digits with IVR
I have a [start] context that all my inbound and '0' calls are routed
into.
Because of the way I want to set my system up, I want to prompt the user
to enter a 1 if they know the extension, or a 2 for a directory and
nothing else.
It works, however there is a 5 to 10 second delay after enter the 1 or 2
before the system responds.
I have read over the wiki on how asterisk handles digit
2005 Feb 24
1
Which Codec(s) to use..?
Hey Everyone,
I am playing around with my * box, and I have a few different phones
hanging off it it right now.
I have a Cisco 7960 capable of g729, ulaw and alaw, I have a Cisco
ATA186 with a Panasonic cordless phone attached to it, I have a Digum
IAXy with a dumb analog phone attached to it, and I have a Linksys
PAP2-NA with an AT&T 959 analog phone attached to it.
I also have several
2009 Nov 11
1
lm and levels
Consider the following example:
x <- c(2,4,3,6)
y <- c(4,9,5,10)
z <- factor(c(1,1,2,2))
summary(lm("y ~ x + z"))
The above works fine.
Suppose I change z so that
x <- c(2,4,3,6)
y <- c(4,9,5,10)
z <- factor(c(1,1,2,NA))
summary(lm("y ~ x + z"))
the last row/observation is not considered in the regression. I would like this to be treated as z with two