similar to: R for Windows - 5 stars award on Windows 7 Download

Dear R Development Core Team R for Windows has been reviewed by Windows 7 Download and got 5 stars award: http://www.windows7download.com/win7-r-for-windows/snvrckjh.html Draw attention to your product by making it visible on website that is used by people who are looking for Windows 7 software. The number of Windows 7 users is rising. Please publish Windows 7 Download award on your website by

The Statistical Computing and Graphics Award The ASA Sections of Statistical Computing and Statistical Graphics have established the Statistical Computing and Graphics Award to recognize an individual or team for innovation in computing, software, or graphics that has had a great impact on statistical practice or research. Typically, awards are granted bi-annually. The prize carries with it a

My congratulations to Chris as well! For those who don't follow the ACM world much, SIGPLAN is the primary research organization for PL and Compilers, and I expect this award to become one of the most prestigious awards in the field. It's quite a coup for Chris and for LLVM to have won it, and moreover to win it in the first year of the award. And it's remarkable that it has

Dear R-help Listers, The following two student competitions are of interests to the now many student R package developers. I'd appreciate your help in spreading them. #1. John M. Chambers Statistical Software Award 2018 The Statistical Computing Section of the American Statistical Association announces the competition for the John M. Chambers Statistical Software Award. In 1998 the

First-Time SIGPLAN Award to Apple's Chris Lattner for Developing Popular LLVM Infrastructure with Applications in Commercial, Research, Teaching, and Open Source Projects From the press release: June 7, 2010 – The ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages (SIGPLAN) today presents its first-ever Programming Languages Software Award to Chris Lattner of Apple Inc. for his design

Dear R Development Core Team R for Mac has been reviewed by Download Typhoon and got "Editor's Pick" award: http://www.downloadtyphoon.com/r-for-mac/infoyvnppyhf Please publish Download Typhoon "Editor's Pick" award on your website by adding the following HTML code: 160 x 80: <a href="http://www.downloadtyphoon.com/" target="_blank"><img

Dear listers, The following command (derived from the example in the ?stars help page) works : data(mtcars) stars(mtcars[, 1:7]) But the following gives an error: stars(mtcars[1, 1:7]) Error in s.y[i, ] : incorrect number of dimensions I was expecting to have the star graph for the first line (Mazda Rx4) The following give an incorrect graph for the first two cars : stars(mtcars[1:2, 1:7])

Hi I don't know if you can help. I am a 2nd year Bsc Cosmetic Science student and in R I need some help in drawing stars. The problem that I have is I want to recreate a radar diagram similar to the one in excel. I have put in these commands in a script window: stars(shampoo1[, 1:6], locations = c(0,0), radius = TRUE, key.loc=c(0,0), main = "Ranked Results for the Sensory

Hi! I have a dataset with three columns -the first two refer to x and y coordinates, the last one are odds ratios. I'd like to plot the data with x and y coordinates and the odds ratio shown as a fourfold plot, which I prefer to do using the stars function. Unfortunately the stars option in symbols is not as cool as the stars function on its own, and now i can't figure out how to do it!

Hi I don't know if you can help. I am a 2nd year Bsc Cosmetic Science student and in R I need some help in drawing stars. The problem that I have is I want to recreate a radar diagram similar to the one in excel. I have put in these commands in a script window: stars(shampoo1[, 1:6], locations = c(0,0), radius = TRUE, key.loc=c(0,0), main = "Ranked Results for the Sensory

Hi Martin, I take your point - but I'd argue that significance stars are a clumsy solution to the very real problem that you outline, and their inclusion as a default sends a signal about their appropriateness that I would prefer R not to endorse. My preference (to the extent that it matters) would be to see the significance stars be an option but not a default one, and the addition of

Dear Rdev, in R 2.9.0 the doc of function stars() does not state that it returns invisibly the location of atomic graphs. This is a valuable information as it may help to set a value for the key.loc parameter of this function. My whish is just that the "value" section in stars.Rd should be documented. Best, Pr. Jean R. Lobry BTW, the URL:,

Hi there Rers I am trying a very basic stars plot: x<-matrix(c(1,4,3,1.1,2,3,4,3,1,1,5,2), ncol = 3, byrow = TRUE, >> dimnames=list(c("a","b","c","d"),c("x","y","z"))) > > stars(x, draw.segments = TRUE, radius=TRUE) > > Can anyone explain what I am seeing there - EACH of my plots should have 3 coloured

Dear all, I agree with both Russ and Terry that the significance stars option should default to FALSE. Here's what Sandy Weisberg and I say about significance starts in the current edition of the R Companion to Applied Regression: 'If you find the ?statistical-significance? asterisks that R prints to the right of the p-values annoying, as we do, you can suppress them, as we will in the

Dear R-Devel, As I am sure many of you know, a special issue of The American Statistician just came out, and its theme is the [mis]use of P values and the many common ways in which they are abused. The lead editorial in that issue mentions the 2014 ASA guidelines on P values, and goes one step further, by now recommending that the words "statistically significant" and related simplistic

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2016 IEEE TCSC Award for Excellence in Scalable Computing Call for Nominations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The IEEE TCSC Award for Excellence in Scalable Computing is awarded for significant and

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2016 IEEE TCSC Award for Excellence in Scalable Computing Call for Nominations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The IEEE TCSC Award for Excellence in Scalable Computing is awarded for significant and

I read through the editorial. This is the one of the most mega-ultra-super-biased articles I've ever read. e.g. The authors encourage Baysian methods, and literally encourage subjective approaches. However, there's only one reference to robust methods and one reference to nonparametric methods, both of which are labelled as purely exploratory methods, which I regard as extremely

A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 1485 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/19980904/6c03ac2b/attachment.pl

R 1.4.0 ?stars has scale: logical flag: if `TRUE', the columns of the data matrix are scaled independently so that the maximum value in each column is 1 and the minimum is 0. If `FALSE', the presumption is that the data have been scaled by some other algorithm to the range [0,1]. but the code has if (scale) { x <- sweep(x, 2,