similar to: survest() for cph() in Design package

Dear UseR, I do not know if this a problem with me, my data or cph/survest in package design. The example below works with a standard data set, but not with my data, but I cannot locate the problem. Note that I am using an older package of survival to avoid a problem with the newly renamed function in survival meeting Design. Dieter # First, check standard example to make sure library(Design)

I wonder if anyone know why survest (a function in Design package) and standard survfit.coxph (survival) returned different confidence intervals on survival probability estimation (say 5 year). I am trying to estimate the 5-year survival probability on a continuous predictor (e.g. Age in this case). Here is what I did based on an example in "help cph". The 95% confidence intervals

Dear Prof Harrell and everyone, My PC: Window XP service pack 3 and service pack 2 R version 2.8.1 and 2.9 alpha For the last 3 days, after updating R, my two computers have been facing problems when running existing and runable R commands that involves with Design package I attempt to use 'survest', but I failed all the times with R (both 2.8.1 and 2.9 alpha) being shut down

Hello- I'm new to R, coding and stats. (Oh no.) Anyway, I have about 12000 data points in a data.frame (dealing with dimensions and geological stage information for fossil protists) and have plotted them in a basic scatter plot. I also added a boxplot to overlay these points. Each worked fine independently, but when I attempt to superimpose them with add=true, I get a different scale for

declare i8 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i8.p0i8( i8* <ptr>, i8 <delta> ) declare i16 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i16.p0i16( i16* <ptr>, i16 <delta> ) declare i32 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i32.p0i32( i32* <ptr>, i32 <delta> ) declare i64 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i64.p0i64( i64* <ptr>, i64 <delta> ) declare i8 @llvm.atomic.load.min.i8.p0i8( i8* <ptr>, i8

Its seems an bug in langref, is there anyone have an look or give an explain? 2010/5/5, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com>: > declare i8 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i8.p0i8( i8* <ptr>, i8 <delta> ) > declare i16 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i16.p0i16( i16* <ptr>, i16 <delta> ) > declare i32 @llvm.atomic.load.max.i32.p0i32( i32* <ptr>, i32

Hello, I apologize for the post as I am certainly overlooking a simple solution to my difficulties with getting a legend to print on a survplot from the rms package. I am plotting the following: survplot(survest(fita), n.risk=T, conf='none', cex.n.risk=.85, dots=T, col='gray10', lty=2) survplot(survest(fit), n.risk=F, conf='none', add=T) survplot(survest(fitb), n.risk=F,

Dear R users, I have a long function that among other things uses the "survest" function from the Design package. This function generates the warning: In survest.cph (...) S.E. and confidence intervals are approximate except at predictor means. Use cph(...,x=T,y=T) (and don't use linear.predictors=) for better estimates. I would like to turn this specific warning off, as it

Dear R users, My question is more methodology related rather than specific to R usage. Using time on study as time in a cox model, eg: library(Design) stanf.cph1=cph(Surv(time, status) ~ t5+id+age, data=stanford2, surv=T) #In this case the 1000-day survival probability would be: stanf.surv1=survest(stanf.cph1, times=1000) #Age in this case is a covariate. #I now want to compare the above

A major new version of the rms package is now on CRAN. The most user-visible changes are: - interactive plotly graphic methods for model fits. The best example of this is survplot for npsurv (Kaplan-Meier) estimates where the number of risk pop up as you hover over the curves, and you can click to bring up confidence bands for differences in survival curves - html methods for model fit

A major new version of the rms package is now on CRAN. The most user-visible changes are: - interactive plotly graphic methods for model fits. The best example of this is survplot for npsurv (Kaplan-Meier) estimates where the number of risk pop up as you hover over the curves, and you can click to bring up confidence bands for differences in survival curves - html methods for model fit

Hi, I was reading a paper published in JCO "Prediction of risk of distant recurrence using 21-gene recurrence score in node-negative and node-positive postmenopausal patients with breast cancer treated with anastrozole or tamoxifen: a TransATAC study" (ICO 2010 28: 1829). The author uses a method to estimate the 9-year risk of distant recurrence as a function of continuous recurrence

Hi, I have fitted a cox model with time-varying covariates (counting process style) using the cph function of the Design package. Now I want to know the survival probabilities at each time point given the history of a single individual. I know the survest function, but I am not sure how to interpretet its output when using time-varying covariates. Does it just give the probabilities as if it

A new version of rms is now available on CRAN for Linux and Windows (Mac will probably be available very soon). Largest changes include latex methods for validate.* and adding the capability to force a subset of variables to be included in all backwards stepdown models (single model or validation by resampling). Recent updates: * In survplot.rms, fixed bug (curves were undefined if

A new version of rms is now available on CRAN for Linux and Windows (Mac will probably be available very soon). Largest changes include latex methods for validate.* and adding the capability to force a subset of variables to be included in all backwards stepdown models (single model or validation by resampling). Recent updates: * In survplot.rms, fixed bug (curves were undefined if

Given a cox model: library(Hmisc); library(survival); (library(Design); cox.model=cph(Surv(futime, fustat) ~ age, data=ovarian, surv=T) str(cox.model) What I need is the total estimated time until failure (death), not the probability of failing at a given time (survival probability), or hazard etc, which is what I get from survest and predict for example. I suspect the answer is

Hi, Sorry to trouble the list. I have a problem which I'm not sure how to resolve. I have a Cox model with 1 independent variable with 2 categories (and thus 2 survival curves on plotting survfit) How can I get an estimate of survival for each category at a particular time point, with standard error? Looking through ?cph and ?coxph, I'm not quite sure how to go about that. I would

Hi folks, Using R Version 1.6.2 (2003-01-10) on SuSE Linux 7.2, I just installed Hmisc_1.5-3.tar.gz and Design_1.1-5.tar.gz These were taken from http://hesweb1.med.virginia.edu/biostat/s/library/r Checked the dependencies: Hmisc: grid, lattice, mva, acepack -- all already installed Design: Hmisc, survival -- survival already installed, so installed Hmisc first All seems to go

Dear R-helpers, I am working with 'cph' models from 'rms' library. When I build simple survival models, based on 'Surv(time, event)', everything is fine and I can make nice plots using plot(Predict(f, time=3)). However, recently I tried to be more specific and used 'Surv(start, stop, event)' type model. Using this model 'plot(Predict(f))' works OK, but

On 9/17/2019 3:17 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > Hi Philip, > > Apologies for leaving this thread linger so long. It was in my > back-burner but Alex's weekly remind me to reply (thanks again, > Alex!). Starting from the end... > > On Mon, 9 Sep 2019 at 18:53, Philip Reames via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Current Plans >> >> At