similar to: How to set ''Return-Path'' in ActionMailer to avoid SPF failure?

I''m trying to create a form where a collection is created, using the example from the Rails 0.9.5 weblog posting: http://weblog.rubyonrails.com/archives/2005/01/26/rails-095-a-world-of- fixes-and-tweaks/ I''m having a bit of trouble. The controller currently looks like this: class StudentController < ApplicationController def new render_text @params.inspect

Your spf record is broken: dovecot.org. 39942 IN TXT "v=spf1 a -all" -- Jim Flowers <jflowers at ezo.net> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

Dear Friends Greetings, i wish to setup SPF look up f0r Postfix on CentOS 6.2. I could not find any document on the net describing the procedure. is anyone have documentation i can follow to setup the SPF please? Thanks / Regards Prabhpal S. Mavi

Dear Friends, i have setup SPF alright, postfix is performing check as well (results below), but even if there is no SPF record exist for a domain, message is still accepted. how can i set the reject action, if no SPF available. May 3 16:11:14 titan postfix/policy-spf[5353]: : SPF none (No applicable sender policy available): Envelope-from: somedomain.com Prabh S. Mavi

I am inquiring about how to setup a proper SPF record. I know there are SPF wizards/generators available but each seem to have a different "opinion" of what should be included and what should not be included. Let me give you a scenario of my setup, and hopefully someone can help me out. My domain is: test.com My mailserver hostname is: mail.host.com which also has a MATCHING PTR

Say someone has setup spf for his domain and sends an email to a user that has in roundcube enabled the sieve forward. If the message is forwarded without altering the message headers, this could result in a message being blocked or not relayed, because sending hosts ip, is not in the spf of the from: domain. Possible solutions are: - add option if enabled, it replaces the From: with that

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Over the past weekend, I added SPF screening on the MTA at shorewall.net. SPF is a mechanism for a domain to use DNS to publish a list of those IP addresses that are used to send legitimate email from that domain. A receiving MTA can use that published information to determine if email from a domain is being sent through an MTA belonging to that

Hello Dovecot gurus, I've set up SPF checking on my postfix gateway and have confirmed that messages from domains set with hard fails that don't come from a good sender are rejected outright. Messages from domains set with a softfail that come from bad sources are tagged in the message header with "Softfail (domain owner discourages use of this host)", but end up in the

Since I've upgraded to dovecot 2.0.13 + Pigeonhole 0.2.3 (Gentoo package) I've received a few complains of users about rejected messages. Investigating the problem, I've seen that when the external sender server publishes SPF information, when some message is sent from there to one of my users that has a Sieve redirect action active to another external system (that does SPF

Does anyone have any experience with adding SPF support to sendmail?? Thank you, -ed-

I need to change the name of the table a model is connected to... like the example in the API... the table is called mice and I want a class called Mouse. class Mouse < ActiveRecord::Base table_name "mice" end I''m doing this cause I want tables in my language (italian) and avoid the nameS thing. just adding it in that way doesn''t work ArgumentError in

I know this is a bit off topic from CentOS itself, but are there any DNS experts that would be able to e-mail me on the side and assist with some questions I have regarding TXT/SPF records? I want to ensure my mail doesn't bounce.

I have a new version of Rake that I''m (almost) ready to release. But before I make an official release, I would like some Rails folk to give it it try ... Why? Because it contains a workaround for the notorious Ruby 1.8.2 test/unit bug. Using this version of rails, it should be possible to unit test a rails app without patching the Ruby 1.8.2 test/unit library. Where to get it?

After *much* digging and playing around, I finally figured out how to unit test instance variables that are created by actions. It was more difficult than I expected. It seems like there should have been a more straight forward way to do this. Can someone enlighten me? A simplified and somewhat contrived example of what I am current doing: Thanks. Matt >> # My Controller of interest

Hello I''m using the login generator on my application, and I found a problem with it. My application is a rack inventory thing, which shows a rack with machines and KVMs and you can click on a rack item to show/edit/destroy it. The edit and destroy actions are protected by the login generator. Now say a user clicks on "destroy" for some machine. He''ll be shown the

I was spamassassin update spamassassin.i386 0:3.2.0-1.el4.rf Complete! and then,Require Perl-Package installed [30998] dbg: diag: module not installed: Mail::SPF ('require' failed) [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Mail::SPF::Query, version 1.999001 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: IP::Country::Fast, version 604.001 [30998] dbg: diag: module installed: Razor2::Client::Agent,

There's no ambiguity here, if you send a message, you are the sender. The envelope from should be yours. On Sunday, 25/10/2020 at 11:48 Marc Roos wrote: Say someone has setup spf for his domain and sends an email to a user that has in roundcube enabled the sieve forward. If the message is forwarded without altering the message headers, this could result in a message being blocked or not

What''s the directors'' take on ading DKIM or SPF functionality into ActionMailer. Is that a function that is better addressed via a plugin, or would an extension or a monkeypatch of this class be an appropriate avenue of pursuit? Steven --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on

On 14/6/20 8:07 am, Scott A. Wozny wrote: > Messages from domains set with a softfail that come from bad sources > are tagged in the message header with "Softfail (domain owner > discourages use of this host)", but end up in the user's Inbox, > anyway. I suppose I kind of figured DoceCot would see the SPF > softfail in the message header and automagically route that

I''ve been using the login generator ''out of the box'' for simple authentication, and its been working fine. Now I want to extend it by simply adding ''type_id'' field which links to my ''user_types'' table, but I''m hitting: #<ActionController::SessionRestoreError: Session contained objects where the class definition