similar to: select data for boxplot

R Help - I'm trying to run a correlation matrix with a covariate of "age" and will at some point will also want to covary other variables concurrently. I'm using the "psych" package and have tried other methods such as writing a loop to extract semi-partial correlations, but it does not seem to be working. How can I accomplish this? library(psych) > set.cor(y =

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 15:16 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > Ralf, et al., > > > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > >

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 14:02 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > > Ralf, et al., > > > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > > additional benchmark results. > > > > First, these are preliminary

Hello. Any idea how to update wine package? I?m havig this problem from several days, or maybe is better get wine package from other repository? Transaction Summary ============================================================================= Install 8 Package(s) Update 181 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 572 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading

Dears Sirs; I'm tryng to compile and install samba 3.0.14a on a SCO Openserver 5.0.6 server (i want to use some shared printers from MS server2003 on a customer network, but with samba SCO ver 2.2, i can't obtain the authorization from the domain controller to use shared resources), but i'm havig a lot of trouble. I had dowloaded samba-3.0.14a.tar.gz fro Samba.org. I had put all the

On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 12:30 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > Ralf, et al., > > Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev > has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains > additional benchmark results. > > First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things > necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the

Ralf, et al., Attached is the latest version of my autovectorization patch. llvmdev has been CC'd (as had been suggested to me); this e-mail contains additional benchmark results. First, these are preliminary results because I did not do the things necessary to make them real (explicitly quiet the machine, bind the processes to one cpu, etc.). But they should be good enough for discussion.

Hello, Using the following lines of code, I created the following graph:

Hello, Using the following lines of code, I created the following graph:

Hi Jack, On 29/05/13 22:04, Jack Howarth wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: >> Hi Jack, I pulled the loop vectorizer and fast math changes into the 3.3 branch, >> so hopefully they will be part of 3.3 rc3 (and 3.3 final!). It would be great >> if you could redo the benchmarks rc3. >> > > Duncan, > As requested, appended

Hello, I have posted this problem before, but thought I try to explain it a bit better. I'm using the function plm to create a fixed effects model for panel data, my method is therefor "within" my effect is "twoways". My Data contains unbalanced Panels due to missing Values, but contains 309 observation for 11 variables (incl. response), with no missing Values. These 309

I have a stock price dataset a snippet of which is: > plcm60[1:15, c(1,3,4,5,6,7)] DATE BIDLO ASKHI PRC VOL RET 1 1/2/03 9.450 9.79 9.700 1531819 0.018907 2 1/3/03 9.670 9.94 9.940 1582192 0.024742 3 1/6/03 9.830 10.05 9.960 1843298 0.002012 4 1/7/03 9.835 10.38 10.350 1412441 0.039157 5 1/8/03 10.220 10.67 10.260 961400 -0.008696 6 1/9/03 10.280

Hello everyone, I would like to test two regression slopes:do they differ significantly?The data and commands I've used so far: x<-8.5:32.5 #Vektor x y<-c( NA , NA , 5.67 , 6.53 , 6.83, 7.41 , 7.93 , 8.5 , 8.86, 9.46 , 9.82 , 10 ,10.35 , 10.7 ,11.03 ,11.37 ,11.61 ,11.84, 12.12, 12.39 ,12.67 ,12.96, 13.28 ,13.47, 13.65) #Vektor y (regression<-lm(y~x)) summary(regression)

On 2016-05-25 19:13, Kelly Lesperance wrote: > Hdparm didn?t get far: > > [root at r1k1 ~] # hdparm -tT /dev/sda > > /dev/sda: > Timing cached reads: Alarm clock > [root at r1k1 ~] # Hi Kelly, Try running 'iostat -xdmc 1'. Look for a single drive that has substantially greater await than ~10msec. If all the drives except one are taking 6-8msec, but one is very

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:25:30PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Jack, I pulled the loop vectorizer and fast math changes into the 3.3 branch, > so hopefully they will be part of 3.3 rc3 (and 3.3 final!). It would be great > if you could redo the benchmarks rc3. > Duncan, As requested, appended are the updated Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results with both RC1 and RC3 llvm 3.3

Dear all, I am pretty new to R only having an introduction course, so please bare with me. I am doing my PhD at The Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology where I am analyzing some calorimetry data from some mice. I have a spreadsheet consisting of measurements of the respiratory exchange rate at different time points measured every 9 minutes over some days. My goal is "bin"/average the

Hello all, I'm trying to use confint from the MASS package to compute confidence intervals for an nls object. When I plot the results, however, they don't make sense - lines cross over the fitted model or just don't match the data. Code is : Thanks for help dat<-data.frame(a,b) with(dat, plot(a,b)) model<-(nls(b~(1/exp(a*x))*n, data=dat, start=list(x=.001,n=20),

Hi, I have a binned data that looks like this. (8.048,18.05] (-21.95,-11.95] (-31.95,-21.95] (18.05,28.05] (-41.95,-31.95] 81 76 18 18 12 (-132,-122] (-122,-112] (-112,-102] (-162,-152] (-102,-91.95] 6 6 6 5 5 (-91.95,-81.95] (-192,-182]

Hello all, I would like to do a Dunnett test in glht(). However, the factor level I want to use as the control is not the first. dunn1<-glht(model3, linfct = mcp(Container = "Dunnett"), alternative = "less") The factor container has 8 levels, so it would be nice not to manually enter in all of the contrasts. I originally discovered glht() when working with a glm model

We encountered a problem with respect to KVM virtual host restore and NTP. Specifically, our VM test host was shutdown by an extended power outage and when power returned all of the restored guests were immediately shutdown by ntp because the time differential between the restored systems and that of the ntpd sync servers exceeded the panic threshold. This is not an acceptable situation so in the