similar to: optimized value worse than starting Value

I know there are several threads about IDEs for R. I've tried Tinn-R, but I am looking for an IDE (win) with a preview function that shows me the variables and the table/matrix etc. when klicking. (comparable to Matlab). Does an IDE like this exist or can't IDEs give this functionality in R? best, Michael [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I am using numerical optimization to fit a 1 parameter model, in which the input parameter is bounded. I am currently using optimize(), however, the problem turns out to have local minima, and optimize does not always seem to find the global minimum. I could to write a wrapping function that tries multiple intervals or starting values, but I would prefer a package that has built-in methods to make

Hi all, I am looking for a good and modern Kernel Regression package in R, which has the following features: 1) It has cross-validation 2) It can automatically choose the "optimal" bandwidth 3) It doesn't have random effect - i.e. if I run the function at different times on the same data-set, the results should be exactly the same... I am trying "np", but I am seeing:

Hi, Is this method broken in R? I am using it to find roots of the following function: f(x) = 2.5*exp(-0.5*(2*0.045 - x)) + 2.5*exp(-0.045) + 2.5*exp(-1.5*x) - 100 It is giving an answer of -38.4762403 which is not even close (f(x) = 2.903809e+25 for x=-38.4762403). The answer should be around 0.01-0.1. This function should converge.. Even for a simple function like f(x) = exp(-x) * x, it gives

Dear All, I would like to minimise a nonlinear function subject to linear inequality constraints as part of an R program. I have been using the constrOptim function. I have tried all of the methods that come with Optim, but nothing finds the correct solution. If I use the correct solution as the vector of starting values, though, my program does output the correct solution and optimum - the

I'll not copy all the previous material on this thread to avoid overload. The summary is that all the methods Spencer has tried have some issues. The bad news: This is not uncommon with optimization methods, in part because the problems are "hard", in part because getting them implemented and linked to an interfacing approach like R is very tedious and prone to omissions and

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > severity 376780 important Bug#376780: atd: Please correct LSB formatted dependency info in init.d script Severity set to `important' from `normal' > severity 458442 important Bug#458442: rsync: Slightly wrong LSB header in init.d script Severity set to `important' from `normal' > severity 458474 important Bug#458474:

Worse now: I get stuff such as http://paste.debian.net/44248 in my log. What is dovecot trying to do and why? Kris -- Kristian =?iso-8859-15?q?K=F6hntopp?= <kris at xn--khntopp-90a.de>

Try using SPEEX_ECHO_SET_SAMPLING_RATE to specify your sampling rate. Also, don't forget that the tail need to be longer (proportional to the sampling rate). Last thing, if you use resampling, make sure you use a decent resampler (the Speex one is fine) because otherwise, any aliasing left will not be cancelled. Jean-Marc Mihai Balea a ?crit : > Hi all, > > I am attempting to test

Hi, I decide to write to the list because of a strange behaviour when updating from version 1.1.12 to 1.2rc1. My software was running fine with version 1.1.12, but now I want to benefit from advances on AEC. After updating the library to 1.2rc1 and do few changes on my sources, I run the application and discovered that VAD doesn't work so fine as in previous version 1.1.12 (3 years ago). I

Thank you, but I am thinking about trying to move VAD implementation from 1.1.12 to 1.2. I'm not sure about how difficult it could be (maybe impossible due to Jean Marc has disappear). Have you tried this? Cecile. 2009/8/10 jesus <jmorion at toomeeting.com> > Hi Cecile, > > it seems it is a tabu theme, or nobody uses VAD on speex. I've tried > with external EasyVAD

I've found a wav of an entire album that shorten compresses better than flac. Is this supposed to be possible? wav 388,374,044 flac-6 239,109,203 shn 236,457,697 Cheers. Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford Academic Information Services, Clifford Whitworth Building, Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 5936 Fax: +44 161 295 5888

On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Josh Coalson wrote: > well, I took a look at the files. from my > knowledge of shorten there are two things it does > that flac doesn't do: > > BUT, you have stumbled on some recordings where the > LSB is 0 for much of the file. as a matter of fact, > in > the worse track (track 6) almost the entire signal in > both channels is like that.

> > I've never come across a sample like this which is > > why I thought it wasn't useful to add that > > functionality to FLAC... maybe if this is a common > > practice I should put it in. > ... > I've > compressed around 50 albums with flac and found 1 > where the LSB is 0. Even > if it's 1 in 200, that's going to be lots of cases >

Hi folks, You may have noticed I haven't been very active on the lists recently. At the moment I'm very busy in a non-technical capacity to get xiph.org set up and somewhat more self-sufficient in a number of ways after the demise of iCast. It's work that needs to be done and in general that work is going well. However, it's taking alot of time I'd otherwise be spending

Hi folks, You may have noticed I haven't been very active on the lists recently. At the moment I'm very busy in a non-technical capacity to get xiph.org set up and somewhat more self-sufficient in a number of ways after the demise of iCast. It's work that needs to be done and in general that work is going well. However, it's taking alot of time I'd otherwise be spending

> I'm using whatever comes with Icecast 1.3.11 and Ices 0.22. > > Just grabbed both tarballs from Icecast.org. > > Is there a way to find out the libshout version? I can't really tell from > the Ices source... Hunter, You can look in ices/src/libshout/configure.in at the top I think. Icecast doesn't have SMP issues that I know of, as we ran it on SMP systems for

On Monday, 27 August 2001 at 09:36, Hunter Hillegas wrote: > > Does icecast 0.1 behave differently? (possible problem: bug in ices > > 0.2.2) > > Nope, Ices 0.1 does the same thing. > > > > > Let's try and narrow the scope a bit. > > Great. Let me know what other info you need. I believe you are using some yp servers. Try turning them off and see if

On Monday, 27 August 2001 at 13:03, Hunter Hillegas wrote: > Okay. It died again after about 4 hours. > > I will turn off the yp servers and see if that helps. > > Any other ideas? Same thing, BTW, ices reported a libshout error. What did you change for this last test, if you didn't turn off yp? --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project

Do you know if this problem exists in Icecast2? Is it even worth fixing in the 1.x codebase? Are we the first people to see the bug? Hunter > From: Jack Moffitt <jack@xiph.org> > Reply-To: icecast@xiph.org > Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:51:34 -0600 > To: icecast@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [icecast] Icecast Problems Get Worse > > Directory updates happen asyncronously in a