similar to: help compiling add-on package

Dear all, I tried to install gstat package and add the following compilation error : ------------------------> * Installing *source* package 'gstat' ... creating cache ./config.cache checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... yes checking whether

Hi there, I just installed the package under windows, and it works very well. However, as I tried to install it on a cluster which uses linux OS, "Linux lionxc.aset.psu.edu 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 21:52:39 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux" I always failed. The message during the installation process is as follows: > install.packages("geepack") Warning

Dear all, I did post a message about problems on installing a package (gstat) which ends with a compilation error: ** libs gcc -I/usr/lib/R/include -mieee-with-inexact -fPIC -g -O2 -c block.c -o block.o gcc -I/usr/lib/R/include -mieee-with-inexact -fPIC -g -O2 -c chfactor.c -o chfactor.o gcc -I/usr/lib/R/include -mieee-with-inexact -fPIC -g -O2 -c copy.c -o copy.o gcc

Hi all, I got the >"chfactor.c", line 130: singular matrix in function LDLfactor() Error in predict.gstat(g, newdata = newdata, block = block, nsim = nsim, : LDLfactor< Error, probably because there are some point pairs with zero distance in the matrix. My question is, how can i delete these duplicate nodes from the data set? Thanks, m [[alternative

optim ignores misspelled control parameters, so that trying to set (e.g.) "maxint=1000" in the control argument silently does nothing. The patch below (watch out for line breaks! also posted at http://www.zoo.ufl.edu/bolker/optim_patch.R , and http://www.zoo.ufl.edu/bolker/optim_new.R) adds three lines to optim.R that issue a warning if any names of elements of "control" fail

Dear R-help, Here's a simple example of nonlinear curve fitting where nls seems to get the answer wrong on a very simple exponential fit (my R version 2.7.2). Look at this code below for a very basic curve fit using nls to fit to (a) a logarithmic and (b) an exponential curve. I did the fits using self-start functions and I compared the results with a more simple fit using a straight lm()

All... I'm new to the HP-UX environment... I'm trying to build 1.9.18p3, using the HP compiler...I get the following errors: Compiling util.c cpp: "values.h", line 27: warning 2001: Redefinition of macro MAXINT. cpp: "includes.h", line 290: error 4036: Can't open include file 'sys/statfs.h'. cpp: "includes.h", line 292: error 4036: Can't

Hi, Currently Omega/scriptindex supports filtering by date. For example, all dates between START and END. Would it be possible to extend this behaviour to include the time? We have documents which expire. In order to filter out 'old' articles, we would like to check if the document date is between START=NOW and END=MAXINT. Best regards, Eric

Hi All I am using xen 3.3.0 version and I want to start network virtual interface on Dom U by using the following command # xend start *************************************************************** *************************************************************** ** WARNING: Currently emulating unsupported memory accesses ** ** in /lib/tls glibc libraries. The emulation is

Technically, lambda can always be numeric. It is the observations which must be integral. Would hitting everything larger than maxint or maxlonglong with floor or round fundamentally change the distribution? Well, yes, but enough that it would matter over process risk? Avi On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 11:20 AM Benjamin Tyner <btyner at gmail.com> wrote: > So imagine rpois is changed, such

There's a little source code (typo?) bug in "samba-2.0.4/source/lib/system.c" that hurts compilation at least on HPUX 9.0x (with HP's cc, not gcc!) !! In HPUX's "/usr/include/sys/time.h": .. # ifndef _STRUCT_TIMEVAL # define _STRUCT_TIMEVAL /* Structure returned by gettimeofday(2) system call and others */ struct timeval { unsigned long tv_sec;

Hi, I have ported Samba 2.0.6 to run on Linux/IA-64. I had to make a few modifications to get Samba to configure and compile properly. The mods mostly have to do with missing prototypes which weren't present in system include files (e.g. ptsname()). The biggest pain turned out to be a prototype for crypt() which is defined in <unistd.h> only with -D_XOPEN_SOURCE. Defining this caused

Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the sum, can you break your ?big? simulation into the sum of a few smaller ones? Or is the order of magnitude difference just too great? On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 1:58 PM Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > This issue arose for me in simulations to estimate confidence, > prediction, and tolerance

Hello I have been trying to install gstat on university's unix based system ( i am not familiar with many technical aspects of installation) but i am getting a particular error which i could not find a solution to online. Here is what the technical support guy mailed me back, i am sure someone who understands the technicalities can explain me this procedure in a more lucid way. * **Technical

????? This issue arose for me in simulations to estimate confidence, prediction, and tolerance intervals from glm(., family=poisson) fits embedded in a BMA::bic.glm fit using a simulate.bic.glm function I added to the development version of Ecfun, available at "https://github.com/sbgraves237/Ecfun".? This is part of a vignette I'm developing, available at

Floor (maybe round) of non-negative numerics, though. Poisson should never have anything after decimal. Still think it?s worth allowing long long for R64 bit, just for purity sake. Avi On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 4:38 PM Spencer Graves <spencer.graves at prodsyse.com> wrote: > > > On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote: > > Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is

On 2020-01-19 13:01, Avraham Adler wrote: > Crazy thought, but being that a sum of Poissons is Poisson in the sum, > can you break your ?big? simulation into the sum of a few smaller > ones? Or is the order of magnitude difference just too great? ????? I don't perceive that as feasible.? Once I found what was generating NAs, it was easy to code a function to return pseudo-random

R uses the C 'int' type for its integer data and that is pretty much universally 32 bit these days. In fact R wont' compile if it is not. That means the range for integer data is the integers in [-2^31, +2^31). It would be good to allow for a larger integer range for R integer objects, and several of us are thinking about how me might get there. But it isn't easy to get right, so

>>>>> Spencer Graves >>>>> on Sun, 19 Jan 2020 21:35:04 -0600 writes: > Thanks to Luke and Avi for their comments.? I wrapped "round" around the > call to "rnorm" inside my "rpois.".? For "lambda" really big, that > "round" won't do anything.? However, it appears to give integers in

On my Mac: str(.Machine) ... $ integer.max????????? : int 2147483647 ?$ sizeof.long????????? : int 8 ?$ sizeof.longlong????? : int 8 ?$ sizeof.longdouble??? : int 16 ?$ sizeof.pointer?????? : int 8 ????? On a Windows 10 machine I have, $ sizeof.long : int 4; otherwise the same as on my Mac. ????? Am I correct that $ sizeof.long = 4 means 4 bytes = 32 bits? log2(.Machine$integer.max)