similar to: cross validation of SVM

Hi, I understand from help pages that in order to use a data set with svm, I have to divide it into two files: one for the dataset without the class label and the other file contains the class label as the following code:- library(e1071) x<- read.delim("mydataset_except-class-label.txt") y<- read.delim("mydataset_class-labell.txt") model <- svm(x, y, cross=5)

Hi, Could you please tell me whether SVM can do multiple regression or not? Cheers, Amy _________________________________________________________________ Browse profiles for FREE! Meet local singles online. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I ran two svm models in R e1071 package: the first without cross-validation and the second with 10-fold cross-validation. I used the following syntax: #Model 1: Without cross-validation: > svm.model <- svm(Response ~ ., data=data.df, type="C-classification", > kernel="linear", cost=1) > predict <- fitted(svm.model) > cm <- table(predict,

Hi Could you please explain the line that I got from the documentation of R? does it mean that there is a difference between using and not using the formula interface with SVM ?: If the predictor variables include factors, the formula interface must be used to get a correct model matrix. Cheers, Amy _________________________________________________________________ View photos of

Hi everyone I am trying to do cross validation (10 fold CV) by using e1071:svm method. I know that there is an option (?cross?) for cross validation but still I wanted to make a function to Generate cross-validation indices using pls: cvsegments method. ##################################################################### Code (at the end) Is working fine but sometime caret:confusionMatrix

Hi, I ran two svm models in R e1071 package: the first without cross-validation and the second with 10-fold cross-validation. I used the following syntax: #Model 1: Without cross-validation: > svm.model <- svm(Response ~ ., data=data.df, type="C-classification", > kernel="linear", cost=1) > predict <- fitted(svm.model) > cm <- table(predict,

Hi: I am a newer in using R for data mining, and find the "e1071" pakage an excellent tool in doing data mining work! what frustrated me recently is that when I using the function "svm" and using the "cross=10" parameters, I got all the "accuracies" of the model greater than 1. Isn't that the accuracy should be smaller than 1? so I wander how, the

Hallo! I would need a code for 10-fold cross validation for the classifiers Naive Bayes and svm (e1071) package. Has there already been done something like that? I tried to do it myself by applying the tune function first: library(e1071) tune.control <- tune.control(random =F, nrepeat=1, repeat.aggregate=min.,sampling=c("cross"),sampling.aggregate=mean, cross=10, best.model=T,

Hi, If I try to read the codes of functions in e1071 package, it gives me following error message. >library(e1071) > svm function (x, ...) UseMethod("svm") <environment: namespace:e1071> > predict.svm Error: Object "predict.svm" not found > Can someone help me on this how to read the codes of the functions in the e1071 package? Thanks. Raj

I run the following code, all other is ok, but plot(m.svm,p5.new,As~Cur) is not ok Anyone know why? install.packages("e1071") library(e1071) library(MASS) p5 <- read.csv("http://www.public.iastate.edu/~aiminy/data/p_5_2.csv") p5.new<-subset(p5,select=-Ms) p5.new$Y<-factor(p5.new$Y) levels(p5.new$Y) <- list(Out=c(1), In=c(0)) attach(p5.new)

I run the following code, all other is ok, but plot(m.svm,p5.new,As~Cur) is not ok Anyone know why? install.packages("e1071") library(e1071) library(MASS) p5 <- read.csv("http://www.public.iastate.edu/~aiminy/data/p_5_2.csv") p5.new<-subset(p5,select=-Ms) p5.new$Y<-factor(p5.new$Y) levels(p5.new$Y) <- list(Out=c(1), In=c(0)) attach(p5.new)

Hi My name is karthikeyan. I am using svm in R for my data set. my data set contain 60 finance ratio as variables and i want to classify into group of good and bad. I want to know how to do the crossvalidation for the svm . first i am doing modelling and i am predict and i am calculating the probabilities how can i do the cross validation and how can i plot the svm for this variables

Hi, Could you please tell me whether there is a difference in the result of svm when using formula instead of class label? Cheers, Amy _________________________________________________________________ Browse profiles for FREE! Meet local singles online. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Full_Name: Julien Gagneur Version: 2.2.1 OS: Linux (Suse 9.3) Submission from: (NULL) (194.94.44.4) Using the SparseM library (SparseM_0.66) and the e1071 library (e1071_1.5-12) I fail using svm method with a sparse matrix. Here is a sample example. I experienced the same problem under Windows. > library(SparseM) [1] "SparseM library loaded" > library("e1071")

This could be a bug in the e1071 svm code, but maybe not -- I guess I'll send it here anyway. It's reproducible. > x <- seq (0.1,5,by=0.05) > y <- log(x) + rnorm (x, sd=0.2) > library(e1071) > m <- svm (x,y) Process R segmentation fault at Tue Nov 20 23:34:19 2001 > version _ platform i686-pc-linux-gnu arch i686 os

Hello List, I am having a great trouble using svm function in e1071 package. I have 4gb of data that i want to use to train svm. I am using Amazon cloud, my Amazon Machine Image(AMI) has 34.2 GB of memory. my R process was killed several times when i tried to use 4GB of data for svm. Now I am using a subset of that data and it is only 1.4 GB. i remove all unnecessary objects before calling

In e1071 package/svm default epsilon value is set to 0.1 and not 0.5 as documentation says. R

Hi. I'm trying to plot a pair of intertwined spirals and an svm that separates them. I'm having some trouble. Here's what I tried. > library(mlbench) > library(e1071) Loading required package: class > raw <- mlbench.spirals(200,2) > spiral <- data.frame(class=as.factor(raw$classes), x=raw$x[,1], y=raw$x[,2]) > m <- svm(class~., data=spiral) > plot(m,

Dear all, I have a question about using categorical predictors for SVM, using "svm" from library(e1071). If I have multiple categorical predictors, should they just be included as factors? Take a simple artificial data example: x1<-rnorm(500) x2<-rnorm(500) #Categorical Predictor 1, with 5 levels x3<-as.factor(rep(c(1,2,3,4,5),c(50,150,130,70,100))) #Catgegorical Predictor

Hi, Could you please tell me how I correct the following error message? “Error in object$tables[[v]] : subscript out of bounds” This is the code: library(e1071) data(iris) attach(iris) class_label <- names(iris)[1] myformula <- formula(paste(class_label,"~ .")) mymodel<-naiveBayes(myformula, iris,cross=3) predict(mymodel,iris) ##Error in object$tables[[v]] :