similar to: source(,echo=T) doesn't echo final comments

Hi everyone, We are a longtime samba/win desktop shop but are getting more Macs. Samba sernet rpms 3.3.9 on CentOS 5.4 test box (started to test 3.43 but will wait) and I confirmed a problem I have been having in production. Server is ADS member with ldap stored idmap. All AD auth and idmap are identical to production servers and have been working fine for years. Filesystem is XFS and there are

How about $ sudo yum list installed | grep <reponame> It won?t work in CentOS 5 but it should work in 6 or 7 Val?re Binet [C] IT Security Administrator Kelly Government Solutions On-Site at the NIH NIH / NIA / IRP Tel : 410 558 8013 mailto: binetv at nia.nih.gov On 7/21/15, 5:09 PM, "Robert Wolfe" <Robert.Wolfe at malco.com> wrote: >Try: > >sudo yum

Our environment has several "classes" of servers, such as "development", "production", "qa", "utility", etc. Then we have all our users. There's no obvious mapping between users and server class. Some users may have access to only one class, some may span multiple classes, etc. And for maximum complexity, some classes of machines use local

Hi, All, I try to accessing the x11() device over cgi - namely, when trying to create a graphic using the jpeg() function, everything is fine from the command line but it won't work over cgi, producing the error: "Unable to open connection to X11 display" Do you you know how to solve this problem or has anyone actually solved this particular problem satisfactorily? Thanks in

Is there a good strategy for testing examples which should not be run by default? For instance, I have examples which get data from the Internet. If I wrap them in try() then they can be skipped if the Internet is not available, but may not be tested in cases when I would like to know about the failure. (Not to mention that the example syntax is ugly.) If I mark them \dontrun or \donttest

Hi again; I have placed many examples in the CTFS Rd pages because my audience really really likes lots of examples in order to understand the options available in a functions. At this time I have set them all to \dontrun{}. however, this isn't because the example command line with its function and options won't work, but rather that CTFS specific datasets must exist to have the

You've answered my question 2 about why the manual was in odd order > R CMD check was more of a check of the latex version of the files, not > the final manual. I was looking at the result of R CMD check, and it was in random order (perhaps file date?), not just a different collation choice. Very odd. I will cease worrying about what I might have "done wrong". I omitted the

Hello all-- I am trying to determine what I have isntalled from a given repository. I have seen several references to "yum repo-pkgs" which I think is what would work for me, but "repo-pkgs" does not seem to be a part of yum 3.2.29. Is this a yum add on that I could get somewhere? -- -------------------------------------------- MzK "Way down deep, we're all

1. I often like to put bits of the output into the manual pages. (We can have a discussion of the value of this elsewhere -- I think it is sometimes a good thing.) In R I need to surround these with \dontrun{} for the sake of the tester, which is fine. But the printed output contains ## Not run and ## End (not run) comments, which defeats the purpose of the lines by breaking them

Dear list, I have just started to use roxygen and cannot find out how to specify NOT RUN examples. I know that to include R code examples works via the @examples tag followed by the code. Without roxygen, if I want R code not to be run when processing the .Rd files I would include the \dontrun tag \examples{\dontrun{ ... some example R code} } How can I achieve this using roxygen? Thanks Mark

On 14-11-26 05:49 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: > On 26/11/2014, 1:45 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote: >> Is there a good strategy for testing examples which should not be run by >> default? For instance, I have examples which get data from the Internet. >> If I wrap them in try() then they can be skipped if the Internet is not >> available, but may not be tested in cases when I

Dear list, When I run an R CMD check --as-cran on my package (pROC) I get the following note: > Uses the superseded package: ?doSNOW? The fact that it uses the doSNOW package is correct as I have the following example in an .Rd file: > #ifdef windows > if (require(doSNOW)) { > registerDoSNOW(cl <- makeCluster(2, type = "SOCK")) > ci(roc2,

Dear all, I (and a colleague) have been working on our first package (for fitting a certain type of cognitive models: http://www.psychologie.uni-freiburg.de/Members/singmann/R/mptinr) for quite a while now and have the feeling, that it is "good to go". That is, we want to submit it to CRAN. However, I still have two questions before doing so and would appreciate any comments. 1. How

Hello, The package I'm finishing up contains a series of functions intended to be run one after the other, as in: do data-prep using A() run complicated, slow, analysis B() do complicated, slow additional analysis C() plot the results with D() and E() Now, in the documentation for each of those functions, I put the entire sequence to illustrate the proper sequence. But this means that the

This is probably a hardware problem but I am posting here in case anyone else has seen it or it is actually software. If you have seen anything like it please let me know. Chuck For the last 1.5 years I have had occasional problems on a large (6.8 TB) Samba server. Two of the mounted filesystems will partially dismount at intervals between 3 days and 3 months. Files will still be open but any

Hello, Is there an way to easy comment of sections of code? I was thinking something along the lines of \dontrun{ codeline 1 .... codeline k } but that could be used in regular script files. When I am still working on a script, I often want to being using what is done, but I would like the parts I am still working on not to be run when I use source() on the file. I can set everything off

Dear R-helpers, making a package (windowsXP), that includes a bunch of functions, but none have examples (all example code is within \dontrun{} blocks). I do R CMD check Maeswrap, all bits get OK-ed, except: "Running examples in 'Maeswrap-Ex.R' failed." When I run the 'Maeswrap-Ex.R' file myself, there are no problems. Any pointers? thanks Remko

Oh, I completely missed that one. It's very neat as it seems to work both on Windows and Unix. Thanks! Xavier On 10/02/15 10:52, Martyn Plummer wrote: > The CRAN package snow is superseded by the parallel package which is > distributed with R since version 2.14.0. Here are the release notes > > \item There is a new package \pkg{parallel}. > > It incorporates (slightly

Hi, checking my package with check from devtools leads to the output Functions with \usage entries need to have the appropriate \alias entries, and all their arguments documented. The \usage entries must correspond to syntactically valid R code. See chapter ?Writing R documentation files? in the ?Writing R Extensions? manual. * checking Rd contents ... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in

Hi all, Today, i just installed the newest R version 2.10.1 and other necessary tools for building R package under windows,e.g. Rtools, perl. All are the newest version. After the correct configuration under windows (configuration should be correct), i use it to re-check my old package. I found the following prolem when checking EXAMPLEs in each function, which did not exist before this