similar to: Expectation of E(x^1/2)

Hello all!!! 1) I am wondering is there a way to generate random numbers in R for Bivariate Uniform distribution? 2) Does R have  built-in function for generating random numbers for any given bivariate distribution. Any help would be greatly appreciated !! Good day! Haneef Anver [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Tuesday 01 December 2009 15:04, Chris Lattner wrote: > > The size is actually calculated from an EVT nearly everywhere (and > > where it's not it should be easy to add). We could just replace the > > size with the EVT and have more information. > > It sounds like you're looking for a property of an instruction, not an > operand. If you're looking for

On Dec 1, 2009, at 1:10 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 01 December 2009 15:04, Chris Lattner wrote: > >>> The size is actually calculated from an EVT nearly everywhere (and >>> where it's not it should be easy to add). We could just replace the >>> size with the EVT and have more information. >> >> It sounds like you're looking for a

Hi! My question(s) in the end might be silly but I am no expert on this, so here it goes: Noy-Meir (1973), Pielou (1984) and a few others have pointed to non-centered PCA being in some cases useful. They clearly explain that "it is the case" when multi-dimensional data display distinct clusters (which have zero, or near-zero, projections in some subset of the axes) and the task is

On Dec 1, 2009, at 11:43 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 01 December 2009 12:14, Dan Gohman wrote: >> On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:03 AM, David Greene wrote: >>> On Tuesday 01 December 2009 11:01, Chris Lattner wrote: >>>> What are you trying to accomplish? What would use this? >>> >>> I am trying to determine whether a MachineMemOperand is a vector

On Tuesday 01 December 2009 12:14, Dan Gohman wrote: > On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:03 AM, David Greene wrote: > > On Tuesday 01 December 2009 11:01, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> What are you trying to accomplish? What would use this? > > > > I am trying to determine whether a MachineMemOperand is a vector > > operand. > > Again, what's that for? If you're

I''m trying to write a custom expectation: controller.should_require_login_for(:action_name). I''m using the example in the docs for ''Custom Expectation Matchers'' but I''m unsure how to make the get() method available to my ShouldRequireLogin class. I''ve tried requiring spec_helper but no joy. can anyone help? thanks -- View this message in

Begin forwarded message: > From: Xavier Shay <xshay at rhnh.net> > Date: 23 September 2006 05:53:57 BDT > To: james.mead at mail.com > Subject: [PATCH] Remove warning in expectation.rb > > Hi James, > Please find below a one line addition to lib/mocha/expectation.rb > to remove the following warning: > > mocha-0.3.2/lib/mocha/expectation.rb:32: warning:

This is just a note in case anyone else is using the (I believe experimental) custom expectations. The custom expectation I had written used the custom ''met_by?'' function, which now appears to have been replaced by the ''matches?'' function to determine whether the expectation is met. Steve

For example... def test_should_receive_at_least_three_arguments object = mock object.expects(:foo).with { |*args| args.size >= 3 } #=> Rather pointless expectation to ensure that we get at least three arguments end If possible, I''d like to remove/rename this functionality. Instead, I''d like to be able to set an expectation that checks for specified arguments _and_ a

Dear all, I have some questions for count data. First, I want to calculate the expectation value and variance from truncated data when I assume that the truncated data follow Poisson or negative binomial distribution. For example, N freq 1 30 2 35 3 26 4 8 5 0 6 2 7 0 The mean of N is 2.2. If the data follows Poisson distribution, the estimated lambda is 1.9. Is there any package to

I''m wondering what''s the difference between stub and message expectation with any_number_of_times, for example: myMock = mock("mymock") myMock.stub!(:is_a?).with(MyClass).and_return(false) and myMock = mock("mymock") myMock.should_receive(:is_a?).with(MyClass).any_number_of_times.and_return(false) because is_a? may not be called at all, it just like a

Hi! The following example doesn''t work for me: http://pastie.caboo.se/41732 However, if the call to msg() happens in the specify block after the expecation and not in the setup, it will pass. Why is this? I thought the setup method was there to actually ''construct'' the context and the specifications are some kind of "postconditions" that only need to be

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1047 --- Comment #5 from Asbj?rn Sloth T?nnesen <asbjorn at asbjorn.it> --- Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20160217/e911c053/attachment.html>

On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 03:00:41PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote: > ee0e56f43e55307fefa1d04505ed6477d604d220 slightly changes the output of > --list but test-virt-builder-list.sh has not been updated accordingly. > > Adapting the expected output makes test-virt-builder-list.sh pass again. > -os-version: phony-debian > +OS version: phony-debian Now I look

I find that a lot of times I want to ensure a method gets called exactly once, for example when testing caching or eager loading. What does the list think of adding this little humane method to Mocha::Expectation? def once times(1) self end which means this: def test_should_only_grab_post_once_from_the_cache Post.expects(:get_cache).with(google_vs_yahoo.id).times(1)

I''ve got something like this: # post_observer.rb after_create # ...stuff Delayed::Job.enqueue(PostSharer.new(post, post.user)) end ... # post_sharer.rb class PostSharer < Struct.new(:post, user) def perform # Delayed::Job calls .perform on the object passed into enqueue end end # post_controller_spec.rb it "shares the post" do

ee0e56f43e55307fefa1d04505ed6477d604d220 slightly changes the output of --list but test-virt-builder-list.sh has not been updated accordingly. Adapting the expected output makes test-virt-builder-list.sh pass again. --- builder/test-virt-builder-list.sh | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/builder/test-virt-builder-list.sh

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757 Summary: SIP connection helper not setting RTCP conntrack expectation Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: ip_conntrack

I was reading through the FlexMock docs and noticed the expectation method .mock, which returns the original mock associated with an expectation. It looks really handy for writing nice all-in-one mocks like: mock_user = mock(''User'').expects(:first_name).returns(''Jonah'').mock So I started playing around with mocha and found I could actually already do this!