similar to: R 2.6 Support Question

Can any give me or point me to a short and simple explanation of what HDLC is?

Hello, I''ve tried just some minutes ago to download the sourcecode of lustre from [1], but it failed with this error: An error occurred while processing your request. Reference #50.663007d9.1206002944.16ba5fe1 Does anybody have some hints how to get the lustre source code then? I need this tarball for the debian packaging. If someone could point me to an alternative download

Hi, R's software development life cycle is documented here: ??https://www.r-project.org/doc/R-SDLC.pdf This is available via the Certification link, under Documentation, on the main R Project web page: ??https://www.r-project.org Section 4.4 of the document, on page 10, covers the release cycles, and section 4.6, on page 11, covers maintenance, support and retirement. Section 4.6

Hi all, At long last, Lustre 1.6.5 is available on the Sun Download Center Site. http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/get.jsp The change log and release notes can be read here: http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php?title=Change_Log_1.6 Thank you for your assistance; as always, you can report issues via Bugzilla (https://bugzilla.lustre.org/) Happy downloading! -- The Lustre Team --

Hi all, At long last, Lustre 1.6.5 is available on the Sun Download Center Site. http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/get.jsp The change log and release notes can be read here: http://wiki.lustre.org/index.php?title=Change_Log_1.6 Thank you for your assistance; as always, you can report issues via Bugzilla (https://bugzilla.lustre.org/) Happy downloading! -- The Lustre Team --

Hello Everyone,   I’m a SAS user who has recently become interested in sequential clinical trials designs. I’ve discovered that the SAS based approaches for these designs are either too costly or are “experimental.” So now I’m looking for alternative software. Two programs that seem promising are SPLUS Seqtrial and R.   I recently obtained a 30 day trial for the SPLUS Seqtrial add-on and have

On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:00:10PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:00:10 -0600 > From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt at cvs.openbsd.org> > Subject: Upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability > To: bugtraq at securityfocus.com > Cc: announce at openbsd.org > Cc: dsi at iss.net > Cc: misc at openbsd.org > > There is an upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability that

On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:00:10PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:00:10 -0600 > From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt at cvs.openbsd.org> > Subject: Upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability > To: bugtraq at securityfocus.com > Cc: announce at openbsd.org > Cc: dsi at iss.net > Cc: misc at openbsd.org > > There is an upcoming OpenSSH vulnerability that

It has just come to my notice that Redhat is planning to ship a forked version of OpenSSH. The change goes beyond the usual patches applied to RPMs in the build process: Redhat have built their own OpenSSH tarball and are using that in their source RPM instead of the official release distribution. If you are interested, have a look at the openssh-3.9p1-7.src.rpm from the Fedora development/

FYI >To: misc@openbsd.org >Subject: FreeBSD hiding security stuff >Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:51:42 -0700 >From: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@cvs.openbsd.org> > >A few FreeBSD developers apparently have found some security issue >of some sort affecting i386 operating systems in some cases. > >They have refused to give us real details. > >A promise is now being

Hi This is Vignesh with Makro Technologies, Inc. We have been in business for over 10 years and we are one of the Fast 500 National IT staffing and Solution firms in USA. Our clients include country’s top-notch IT, Healthcare, Pharmaceutical, Financial, Telecom,Government and other industries. Staying current with technology, finding great consultants and exceeding our clients''

Hi, This mail is a request for vendors who have integrated OpenSSH into their products or devices to step up and provide some financial assistance back to the project. Please note that this request is intended for *vendors* - our individual userbase already helps us in every appropriate way. You may have noticed a similar request for OpenSSH/OpenBSD funding made by Marco Peereboom in this last

Hi, This mail is a request for vendors who have integrated OpenSSH into their products or devices to step up and provide some financial assistance back to the project. Please note that this request is intended for *vendors* - our individual userbase already helps us in every appropriate way. You may have noticed a similar request for OpenSSH/OpenBSD funding made by Marco Peereboom in this last

Hello ! Good day. I?d like to know what is the End of Support Date of Version 3 of ?R?. Thanks for your answer. Have a good day. Best Regards Eric Bernard DCTI/BS/EC Cordialement. Eric Bernard Michelin DCTI/BS/EC [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Tuesday, 10 July 2001 at 01:26, Nick Ludlam wrote: > Not got to the bottom of it yet, but commenting out both LOG_INFO > lines in thread/thread.c stops it segfaulting. Now I'm back to the old problem > of a 128k stream not being sent fast enough to the clients. you should just be able to increase STACKSIZE in thread/thread.c from 8192 to 65536. The default stack size is too small,

OpenSSH 7.1 has just been released. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. OpenSSH also includes transitional support for the legacy SSH 1.3 and 1.5 protocols that may be enabled at compile-time. Once again, we would like to thank the OpenSSH community

OpenSSH 3.3 has just been released. It will be available from the mirrors listed at http://www.openssh.com/ shortly. OpenSSH is a 100% complete SSH protocol version 1.3, 1.5 and 2.0 implementation and includes sftp client and server support. We would like to thank the OpenSSH community for their continued support and encouragement. Changes since OpenSSH 3.2.3: ============================

A colleague was having trouble running OpenSSH 3.3p on his server. He, like many of us, has been clobbered by the mighty security penis of Theo De Raadt into enabling "privsep". But on some Linux 2.2 kernels, this is broken. Apparantly, OpenSSH "portable" relies on non-POSIX compliant mmap() features. Making the mmap() call in monitor_mm.c look something like this:

I work in a US government office, where regular computer users are not allowed Admin access to their computers, and all software must go through an extensive evaluation to be approved for installation and use. Several of us in my office would greatly benefit from R, so I'd like to request that it go through the approval process. Does anyone out there have any experience or advice to share?

Just a warning and a call to action: Theo de Raadt has convinced me to remove SOCKS support from our port of OpenSSH. His argument is that it can be easily and generically implemented as a ProxyCommand. This fits with my desire to keep our divergences from the OpenBSD codebase to a minimum. This looks like a few hours work (for someone more familiar the SOCKS API that I). It is basically a