similar to: can´t start help in Win7

I'm new to samba. I'm using 4.5.16-Debian at home to make available a drive in a linux machine to two users on a Win7 machine. Read-only. No concurrent access. Low-throughput, no streaming etc. That's it. No other sharing of any kind, no write-permission of any kind, etc. My application seems to require 1% of the capabilities of samba. Samba is overkill. What other software

I run a samba 4.1.17-Debian DC (and secondary, same version) and a print server (same samba version, CUPS 1.7.5). I can log in to the domain from all Linux and Windows machines. I can print through the print server from all Linux and WinXP machines (not member!). I recently have trouble printing from a Win7 Ultimate VM. This may be due to a reboot of the whole cluster after a power fail.

On Sat, 2019-08-24 at 16:31 +0000, Zalth via samba wrote: > I'm new to samba. I'm using 4.5.16-Debian at home to make available a > drive in a linux machine to two users on a Win7 machine. Read-only. > No concurrent access. Low-throughput, no streaming etc. That's it. > No other sharing of any kind, no write-permission of any kind, etc. > My application seems to

On 04/05/2020 18:28, pavlos via samba wrote: > Hi All, > I have a simple home network - no domain controller, no DNS, just DHCP on > my router. > I have simple samba file server built on Arch Linux, with single share > exposed and couple of client computers, some ot them running Win7 x32 > (embedded, not-upgradeable), some others with different Win or Linux > systems. All of

Hi Rowland, User configuration: [root at arch1 /]# pdbedit -L nobody:65534:Nobody root:0: ala:1000: [root at arch1 /]# cat /etc/passwd root:x:0:0::/root:/bin/bash bin:x:1:1::/:/usr/bin/nologin daemon:x:2:2::/:/usr/bin/nologin mail:x:8:12::/var/spool/mail:/usr/bin/nologin ftp:x:14:11::/srv/ftp:/usr/bin/nologin http:x:33:33::/srv/http:/usr/bin/nologin

Hi all, I installed F10 Final today. This was a clean install, not an upgrade from F9. Kudos the the Fedora team as the level of maturity noted in the install process, including using encrypted partitions, keeps getting better with each release. I'd still like to see easier options in the GUI with respect to selecting entire groups of applications, rather than having to go through individual

Hi all, I installed F10 Final today. This was a clean install, not an upgrade from F9. Kudos the the Fedora team as the level of maturity noted in the install process, including using encrypted partitions, keeps getting better with each release. I'd still like to see easier options in the GUI with respect to selecting entire groups of applications, rather than having to go through individual

Dear Ola, I cannot say anything about Windows 7, as we do not have any Win7 machines here in our institute and I even do not know someone who have Win7 on a private machine. I will try to find a machine with this OS and test it. Anybody having experiences with Win7 yet? Greetings Jo > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [R] snowfall on Win7 > Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:25:37

Hi, I am apprehensive about buying the Windows 7 for my new desktop PC ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig_b41uOQCg ) and pay more than 100 euros for it. I don't have enough money before I get the student loans after New Year 2012, and I was wondering if I could get Linux somewhere today or before Christmas holidays. Before I decide, tell me, can I play any Win7 game I like on Linux, by

On 03/02/2015 02:06 AM, Fred Smith wrote: > Hi all! > > I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 (and > also Fedora 19, which the C7 is intended to replace). The Fedora installer > had found the windows installation and it appeared in the grub menu, > and was bootable and worked fine. > > The C7 installer did not put the windows installation

Hello, everybody! Does anyone have experience of running win7/winxp with xl? As for me, I got HAL_INITIALIZATION_FAILED BSOD on win7 booting and guest hanging in case of winxp. When i run these guests (with the same configs) with xm, everything is ok. The guests boot perfectly. Did anyone run into it too? I use the lattest xen-unstable, but i saw the problem several months ago too. My

Hi All, I have a simple home network - no domain controller, no DNS, just DHCP on my router. I have simple samba file server built on Arch Linux, with single share exposed and couple of client computers, some ot them running Win7 x32 (embedded, not-upgradeable), some others with different Win or Linux systems. All of the client are connecting to the share using the same user/pwd, set up previously

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Sunday, March 01, 2015 20:06:26 -0500 > From: Fred Smith <fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] installing C7 on a laptop with Win7, dual boot > > Hi all! > > I've just installed C7 on my netbook that already contained Win7 > (and also Fedora 19, which the C7 is

hi，every one I have some trouble with the virsh to get vm mem-usage in guest os. [root@localhost ~]# virsh list --all Id Name State 1 wwl_centos7_1708 running 2 windows-virtio-template running I create two vms one guest os is centos, the other is window 7 virsh dommemstat wwl_centos7_1708 actual 4194304 swap_in 0 swap_out 0 major_fault 194 minor_fault 219454 unused 3729588 available 3881812

Hello, I have samba 3.5.6 PDC and BDC on debian squeeze with openldap backend and couple samba member servers based on samba 3.5.15 and 3.6.6 on solaris 11 delivering shares to windows and linux users. recently we moved from samba 3.0.24 on solaris to above verions and we stuck with a problem on windows 7 machines. on solaris zfs filsystem mounted with these settings: drwxrws--t 20 root

> > It's not that I use the win7 installation much, but I do want to be able > to do so when one of those rare occasions pops up. > If your laptop is powerful enough and its processor supports hardware virtualization, you can have both systems running at the same time with almost no speed decrease. There are free virtualization solutions such as Virtual Box. You would instsl

On 04/05/2020 20:21, pavlos wrote: > > All clients are connecting either anonymously read-only which > leverages the 'nobody' samba user, or using 'ala' user/pwd. Both have > same?problems. > > No local 'ala' users on any client machine. In Windows login dialog I > am supplying username?as '192.168.1.115\ala' and the defined password >

Can you get a network capture, and also ensure the logs have the exact time you see the failure in it (and tell us that time, to the highest resolution you can)? I can't see anything suspicious, but at log level 10 the 'log limit = 50' will cut in very fast, so it might have been lost. Set that to 0. Andrew Bartlett On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 22:28 +0200, pavlos via samba wrote: >

I've made some pseudo progress .. I deleted my DNS domain name from my client -- after that, I was able to get a message (Welcome to Bliss Domain) -- followed by 'Domain join failed, you will not be in the Domain. Reboot now to activate your new domain name. Upon reboot, it thinks I am in Bliss domain, BUT it acts completely unjoined -- no domain groups in group list selections, Shares

Have been trying to get a 64-bit Win7 guest to access a usb thumbdrive (and eventually an Apple iTouch). Host is CentOS 6.2 and the guest is running under qemu-kvm with SELinux enabled and sVirt separating guests from each other and guests from the host. Do I need to install the virt-io drivers in the Win7 guest, or are there more permission and SELinux blocks in my path? Dave