similar to: creating multiple plots using a splitting factor

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 9:24 PM Ralf Prengel <ralf.prengel at rprengel.de> wrote: > Hallo, > not direkt a solution but I m using a kali rolling release installation on > hard disk. > Works fine here. > > Ralf > > Hi, I am facing the below mentioned issue. #wget -q -O - http://www.atomicorp.com/installers/atomic |sh [root at openvas8 ~]# yum -y install openvas Last

Guys Given the replies and interests lately on the WRR scheduler, and the shameless promotion of Route Hat (only kidding), my question is simple. Is there an alternative for the 2.6.x kernels? >From what I gather WRR is only available for the 2.4 kernels... Regards -- Kenneth Kalmer kenneth.kalmer@gmail.com http://opensourcery.blogspot.com

Hi all, Here''s the situation. I have 80 users sharing a internet link of 5Mb link. The users are grouped in /29 ip addr classes so I have 10 classes of users I want to create a root htb, then 10 htb childs each with 0.5Mb bandwidth. The traffic will be directed to each class using tc filters. Now, I want that each of 8 users from each class to share equally the class bandwidth. Can I

Hi If I have a HTB class with 128kbit, and I want to put "N" users in that class ( in order to share bandwidth fairly ) , which is better for me ? esfq (hash dst) or wrr ? I would attach esfq or wrr to HTB parent class. Also I''ve readed on Jim script that over WRR put a RED qdisc, but I don''t understand it. bests andres

Guys I''m looking for some advice on the following situation: We''re serving a residential complex with internet, the network has grown and with it has the problems, below is a descriptive layout of our current setup: Connection: ADSL Down/Up speed: 512kbps/256kbps (1024kbps/256kbps in the near future) 2.0GHz Celeron D with 512MB RAM Current users: 140 Maximum amount of users:

Guys Reading through my lartc mail, and thinking on how to tackle my next shaping solution, gave me an idea. I''d like to propose this idea for scrutiny and if it sounds viable I''ll definitely need to start developing in due time. For me in my day to day work with developing network application specifically geared for middle-tier ISP''s, and reading on other peoples

Hi All, I''ve just installed WRR and am looking at tools to monitor, graph and display the system and throughput of each queue/class/filter. I''ve looked at: iptraf - only shows tcp/udp flows, not QOS queue throughputs show.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) tc-graph.pl - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can tell) polltc_ - doesnt work with WRR (as far as I can

Guys All the recent discussions recently, and the knowledge of a 2.6 port, of WRR has made me very keen on trying it. I had a look at the docs and examples know but my mind is not in a very receptive state. Take this simple example. Incoming internet connection of 1mbps. Shared between up to 25 users simultaneously. I know that WRR can fairly distribute the traffic amongst the currently

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________

Hello, i´ve installed a Suse 8.1 minimal System with iproute 2.4.7 and iptables, Suse default Kernel 2.4.19. When I start the Wondershaper 1.1a Script I get the following Error: CBQ: "allot" is required to set WRR parameters. /home/skripte/./wshaper: line 72: allot: command not found CBQ: "allot" is required to set WRR parameters. /home/skripte/./wshaper: line 78: allot:

Hi folks, Suppose I create the character vector charvec by > charvec<-c("a1.b1","a2.b2") > charvec [1] "a1.b1" "a2.b2" and then I use strsplit on charvec as follows: > splitlist<-strsplit(charvec,split=".",fixed=TRUE) > splitlist [[1]] [1] "a1" "b1" [[2]] [1] "a2" "b2" I was wondering

Dear members, I am trying to share the bandwith for all users fairly. because some users heavily uses p2p programs and a few hosts consume most of bandwith. when we limit each flow it does not work as one client has many connection at same time. Firstly I tried to write a script that use the ipfm(which accounts traffic usage) logs as follow .extract ip addresses heavy bandwith users from

I have this problem: I have an Internet line input with variable speed. I have a max speed and a min speed: Vmax and Vmin. The speed is always changing between Vmax and Vmin. I want to share the actual bandwidth (you don''t not how much, you only know the speed is between Vmax and Vmin) for N clients. The bandwidth should be shared so nobody can get more bandwidth than the others.

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: aswrule.gif Type: image/gif Size: 2086 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/attachments/20030109/f9f81cfe/aswrule.gif -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Sweets Bkgrd.gif Type: image/gif

Dear R-Devel List, **TL;DR:** The function **parLapplyLB** of the parallel package has [reportedly][1] (see also attached RRD output) not been doing its job, i.e. not actually balancing the load. My colleague Dirk Sarpe and I found the cause of the problem and we also have a patch to fix it (attached). A similar fix has also been provided [here][2]. [1]:

I have been using R the past couple of years to run models on data we are collecting. I recently got a new computer and updated to a new version of R (2.60 -> 2.90). Since the update, I cannot get my syntax to run. I have tried copying the file it is looking for into many different directories to try and run it. In the last version, I found that it was easiest if the file was copied into the R

Hi, I'm trying to understand the rationale for your proposed amount of splitting and more precisely why that one is THE one. If I put labels on your example numbers in one of your previous post: nbrOfElements <- 97 nbrOfWorkers <- 5 With these, there are two extremes in how you can split up the processing in chunks such that all workers are utilized: (A) Each worker, called

Hello all, I am running a coop satellite link for my aviation company here in Iraq. (silly blog www.stardotstar.org). I am running tc with htb with good success so far. I am working on improving it though and need some help. Currently I have just 4 classes, syn/ack/ping, webchat, http, and then other. We are really happy with how this has improved our ability to call home from our rooms and

Hello, I used the glm function in R to fit a dose-response relationship and then have been using dose.p to calculate the LC50, however I would like to calculate the NOEL (no observed effect level), ie the lowest dose above which responses start occurring. Does anyone know how to do this? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear Christian and Henrik, thank you for spotting the problem and suggestions for a fix. We'll probably add a chunk.size argument to parLapplyLB and parLapply to follow OpenMP terminology, which has already been an inspiration for the present code (parLapply already implements static scheduling via internal function staticClusterApply, yet with a fixed chunk size; parLapplyLB already