similar to: nested factorial effects in a lme model

The config.c32 module (and the CONFIG directive) is not behaving as expected when using syslinux.exe 5.00pre11 as installer. To replicate: 1_ The content of the device: /dira /cat.c32 /config.c32 /ldlinux.c32 /ldlinux.sys /libcom32.c32 /pwd.c32 /syslinux.cfg /dira/dira.cfg 2_ Content of /syslinux.cfg: DEFAULT pwd1 PROMPT 0 LABEL config1 COM32 config.c32 /dira/dira.cfg APPEND /dira/ LABEL

Hi, I have a question about the machine account when one does "net ads join -U admin@REALM.COM when I join a machine to the domain, the machine account that gets created has a non-expiring password. This is only a problem for the security team that monitors our domain, they frown on any accountt that has a non-expiring password.. Is there a switch that I can throw that will create the

Hi all, This seems like a basic problem, but no amount of playing with the code has solved it. I have a time-series data set like that shown below (only longer) and am seeking to plot the data with filled, circular points and error bars. I would like the error bars to be behind the points otherwise they tend to obscure the points (especially when I have a lot of points in the actual data set).

> > C_ While initially thought to be a problem with the INCLUDE > > directive, now it seems the problem is the second parameter of the > > CONFIG directive. The second parameter of the CONFIG directive (which > > sets a new CWD) doesn't seem to work correctly (tested with pwd.c32), > > specially when the new cfg file (the first parameter of the CONFIG >

On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 03:58:19PM -0800, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > Is anyone able to bootstrap llvm-gcc42 svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10? Currently it is > > failing here with... > > It was broken. I think I've fixed it in reverting 125960. > > -eric Eric, The llvm-gcc42 bootstrap is fixed in

Comparing the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for gfortran from llvm-gcc-4.2 of April 7th, 2010 and September 18th, 2010 (from the rc2 2.8 release branch), we seem to be regressing in performance for this release.... ================================================================================ Date & Time : 7 Apr 2010 22:24:16 Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4 Compile Command :

With the case-insensitive file system patch from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9656#c15 applied to dragonegg 2.9, the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks are seen on x86_64-apple-darwin10 under gcc 4.5.3svn using the dragonegg plugin... ================================================================================ Date & Time : 8 Apr 2011 19:52:56 Test Name :

Hi Jack, thanks for the numbers. Any chance of analysing why gcc does better on those where it does much better than dragonegg? Ciao, Duncan. > With the case-insensitive file system patch from http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9656#c15 > applied to dragonegg 2.9, the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks are seen on x86_64-apple-darwin10 > under gcc 4.5.3svn using the dragonegg

Hi All, I'm using R1.8.1 on Windows XP. I'm having trouble producing an R library from source code. A colleague has written the source code, in Unix. I've copied the source code across to Windows (with the help files, data files, description and index) and am trying to compile it into a library. I've "sourced" each of the *.r files and they appear to work.

I'm a programmer in a biology lab who is starting to use R to automate some of our statistical analysis of growth rate determination. But I'm running into some problems as I re-code. 1) Hypotheses concerning Slope similarity/difference: I'm using R's anova(lm()) methods to analyse a model which looks like this: growth.metric ~ time * test.tube I understand that

Hi Matt, First comments about 5.00-pre10. 1_ When using "ctrl+v" in the boot prompt, there is no space character between the version and the boot mode. Additionally, the main version number is shown twice. For example, "SYSLINUX 5.00 5.00-PRE10CHS" should be: "SYSLINUX 5.00-PRE10 CHS" 2_ Boot to menu.c32, press [ESC] to go to the boot prompt. Pressing [ESC]

The previously posted benchnarks for gcc vs llvm-gfortran had one mistake. I was actually had the gfortran for 4.3.1 installed instead of that from gcc 4.2.4. Below are the polyhedron benchmark results for all three compilers... gfortran 4.2.4 Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err % --------- -------

On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:41 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Building the current release 2.7 branch on x86_64-apple-darwin10 > with r81455 reverted, I get the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmark > results (with no test failures)... Very nice! A 14% speedup on a benchmark we don't tune for isn't bad. I imagine that there are several easy wins you could get on it if you were interested

Building the current release 2.7 branch on x86_64-apple-darwin10 with r81455 reverted, I get the following Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results (with no test failures)... ================================================================================ Date & Time : 7 Apr 2010 22:24:16 Test Name : llvm_gfortran_lin_p4 Compile Command : llvm-gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:45:48AM -0700, Bob Wilson wrote: > [CCing Dale since this was his change, not mine] > > The change in 81455 fixes a compiler crash. It doesn't happen very often, but I can't imagine we would want to back that out. Fixing it would be a more reasonable solution. From a quick look at it, the problem is that gcc/config/darwin-c.c is registering va_opt

I've benchmarked the llvm 2.3/llvm-gcc-4.2 release against the stock gfortran compiler from gcc 4.2.4 on a 2.33GHz MacBook Pro using the '-ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3' optimization flags. llvm-gfortran Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err % --------- ------- ---------- ------- -------

Below are the results for the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks compiled with the llvm/compiler-rt/dragonegg 3.3 release and 3.4svn against FSF gcc 4.8.2. The *-stock-de runs omit the -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns flag and the *-de-optnz runs include it. There seems to be little improvement between llvm 3.3 and 3.4 in the stock case which relies entirely on llvm for vectorization. Duncan, has

The Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for dragonegg svn at r141492 using FSF gcc 4.6.2svn measured on x86_64-apple-darwin11 are listed below. The benchmarks used the optimizaton flags... -msse4 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 in all cases. The use of -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns to allow for autovectorization from the FSF gcc front-end only produces a single run-time regression,

Hi Jack, > Attached are the Polyhedron 2005 benchmark results for current llvm/dragonegg svn > on x86_64-apple-darwin11 built against Xcode 4.3.2 and FSF gcc 4.6.3. thanks for the numbers. How does this compare to LLVM 3.0 - were there any regressions? Ciao, Duncan. The benchmarks > for -msse3 and -msse4 appear identical (at least for degg+optnz). This is fortunate > since

[CCing Dale since this was his change, not mine] The change in 81455 fixes a compiler crash. It doesn't happen very often, but I can't imagine we would want to back that out. Fixing it would be a more reasonable solution. From a quick look at it, the problem is that gcc/config/darwin-c.c is registering va_opt for GC. When you build for Fortran, darwin-c.o is not linked so the GC gets