similar to: how to print the full name of the factors in summary?

I have a matrix which I wanted to convert to a data frame. As I could not succeed and resorted to export to csv and reimport it again. Why did I fail in the attempt and how can I achieve what I wanted without this roundabouts? The original matrix: > str(comb_model0) num [1:90, 1:4] 3.5938 0.0274 0.0342 0.0135 0.0207 ... - attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2 ..$ : chr [1:90]

Hello R users I like to extract z values for x1 and x2. I know how to extract coefficents using model$coef but I don't know how to extract z values for each of independent variable. I looked around using names(model) but I couldn't find how to extract z values. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks TM ######################################################### >summary(model) Call:

Dear all R users, I am really struggling to determine the most appropriate lag order of ARIMA model. My understanding is that, as for MA [q] model the auto correlation coeff vanishes after q lag, it says the MA order of a ARIMA model, and for a AR[p] model partial autocorrelation vanishes after p lags it helps to determine the AR lag. And most appropriate model choosed by this argument gives

This message is about a curious difference in timing between two ways of computing the same function. One uses expm, so is expected to be a bit slower, but "a bit" turned out to be a factor of >1000. The code is below. We would be grateful if anyone can point out any egregious bad practice in our code, or enlighten us on why one approach is so much slower than the other. The problem

Hi all, I'm trying to do a simple curve fit and coming up with some interesting results I would like to get comment on. So as shown below, tsR is my explanatory and response is... well... my response. This same data in gnumeric gets fitted with the curve "response=10078.4 + 1358.67 * ln (explanatory - 2009.07) So I'm using nls with the start values supplied by gnumeric. in

I have a data set for different time intervals. The data has three comment lines before data for each time interval. For each time interval there are 500 data points. I want to change the dataset such that I have the following format: t1 t2 t3 ................ 0.00208 0.00417 0.00625 ................. a1 a2 a3 ...................

Hi. I use NUT on embedded system, and after update distro to fresh one I've got a non-working usbhid APC monitoring. There's 2 troubles: 1) I/O error for root on usbhid device 2) Permissions error for nut user Root log: # /usr/bin/usbhid-ups -u root -DDDDDD -a infocom Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.38 (5.1.2-beta1-28-g04cd334) USB communication driver 0.32 0.000000

Hi. I use NUT on embedded system, and after update distro to fresh one I've got a non-working usbhid APC monitoring. There's 2 troubles: 1) I/O error for root on usbhid device 2) Permissions error for nut user Root log: # /usr/bin/usbhid-ups -u root -DDDDDD -a infocom Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.37 (5.1.2-beta1-28-g04cd334) USB communication driver 0.31 0.000000

On 2019/5/10 ??8:58, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > While I was testing this new series (v2) I discovered an huge use of memory > and a memory leak in the virtio-vsock driver in the guest when I sent > 1-byte packets to the guest. > > These issues are present since the introduction of the virtio-vsock > driver. I added the patches 1 and 2 to fix them in this series in order > to

Dear all, Does any one knows why should I get the following error message, when trying to do a simple data.frame?? DataF<-data.frame(Subject,BiomR,Spp,Capas,Litter,Herbs,LitterD,MaxCanH,DDifS p,DSSp,Slope, CanDens,NearestSp) Erro em data.frame(Subject, BiomR, Spp, Capas, Litter, Herbs, LitterD, : arguments imply differing number of rows: 202, 0 The data I am using

While I was testing this new series (v2) I discovered an huge use of memory and a memory leak in the virtio-vsock driver in the guest when I sent 1-byte packets to the guest. These issues are present since the introduction of the virtio-vsock driver. I added the patches 1 and 2 to fix them in this series in order to better track the performance trends. v1:

While I was testing this new series (v2) I discovered an huge use of memory and a memory leak in the virtio-vsock driver in the guest when I sent 1-byte packets to the guest. These issues are present since the introduction of the virtio-vsock driver. I added the patches 1 and 2 to fix them in this series in order to better track the performance trends. v1:

Hi guys, Last week I've switched from my old & good 3.4.63 to 3.14-rc1 and noticed nasty display corruptions when using nouveau. It seems that changing parts of the screen are appearing for a fraction of second in random places. I've recorded this behavior: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEq7JzGVzj0 My hardware is some old motherboard with 00:05.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]:

R Help - I'm trying to run a correlation matrix with a covariate of "age" and will at some point will also want to covary other variables concurrently. I'm using the "psych" package and have tried other methods such as writing a loop to extract semi-partial correlations, but it does not seem to be working. How can I accomplish this? library(psych) > set.cor(y =

Hi all - I am trying to get rails to use memcache for sessions and fragment caching. I''d also like to use the same connection for general caching of this and that. I''m following the instructions here: http://wiki.rubyonrails.com/rails/pages/HowtoChangeSessionStore and hitting a brick wall. I''m using the new memcache-client since from what I''ve read

Hallo, I have this dataset with repeated measures. There are two within-subject factors, "formant" (2 levels: 1 and 2) and "f2 Ref" (25 levels: 670, 729, 788, 846, 905, 1080, 1100, 1120, 1140, 1170, 1480, 1470, 1450, 1440, 1430, 1890, 1840, 1790, 1740, 1690, 2290, 2210, 2120, 2040, 1950), and one between-subject factor, lang (2 levels:1 and 2). The response variable

On Sun, Nov 07 2010 at 6:05pm -0500, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 10:39:23PM +0100, Milan Broz wrote: > > On 11/07/2010 08:45 PM, Andi Kleen wrote: > > >> I read about barrier-problems and data getting to the partition when > > >> using dm-crypt and several layers so I don''t know if that could be > >