similar to: Placing text in a ggplot

I had a problem annotating a graph last year ( see http://n4.nabble.com/Putting-names-on-a-ggplot-td907158.html#a907158 for the discussion) Stefan (smu) provided a solution using annotate(). However I apparently did not update the graph file and,now, when I go back to the thread and try to use Stefan's solution it does not seem to work although I am sure that it did then. The problem

Putting names on a ggplot Can anyone suggest what I am doing wrong here. I am plotting daily temperatures at Ottawa Ontario for 2008 broken down by months, I seperate them by lines and want to put the names of the months at the top of the chart ( with in the graphing area) Everything is working as I want until I try to add the names of the months. I did something similar a few days ago and I

Hi: I need some help with the legend. I got 14 samples(Muestreo) and I am trying to plot a smooth line for each sample. I am able to accomplish that but the problem is that the legend only displays every other sample. How can I force the legend to show all of my Muestreos? Thanks in advance. fish_ByMuestreo <- structure(list(data = structure(list(SampleDate = structure(c(3L, 3L, 3L, 3L,

Dear r-users, I would like to construct 3-day moving average for block maxima series. I tried this: bmthree <- lapply(split(dt, dt$Year), function(x) max(sapply(1:(nrow(x)-2), function(i) with(x, mean(Amount[i:(i+2)],na.rm=TRUE))))) bmthree and got the following output. $`1971` [1] 70.81667 $`1972` [1] 68.94553 $`1973` [1] 102.7236 $`1974` [1] 73.6625 $`1975` [1]

> On Dec 6, 2017, at 5:07 AM, Paul Bernal <paulbernal07 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear friends, > > I have a weekly time series which starts on Jan 4th, 2003 and ends on > december 31st, 2016. > > I set up my ts object as follows: > > MyTseries <- ts(mydataset, start=2003, end=2016, frequency=52) > > MyModel <- auto.arima(MyTseries, d=1, D=1)

Hello everyone, I have a dataset with 5 colums (4 colums with thresholds of weather stations and one with month - data of 5 years). Now I would like to calculate the average for each month. I tried this unsuccessfully: lf.med <- sapply(LF[,1:4],mean,LF[,5]) Error in mean.default(X[[1L]], ...) : 'trim' must be numeric and have length 1 With lf.med <- by(LF[,1:4],LF[,5],mean)

Thank you very much David. As a matter of fact, I solved it by doing the following: MyTimeSeriesObj <- ts(MyData, freq=365.25/7, start=decimal_date(mdy("01-04-2003"))) After doing that adjustment, my forecasts dates started from 2017 on. Cheers, Paul 2017-12-06 12:03 GMT-05:00 David Winsemius <dwinsemius at comcast.net>: > > > On Dec 6, 2017, at 5:07 AM, Paul

Dear friends, I have a weekly time series which starts on Jan 4th, 2003 and ends on december 31st, 2016. I set up my ts object as follows: MyTseries <- ts(mydataset, start=2003, end=2016, frequency=52) MyModel <- auto.arima(MyTseries, d=1, D=1) MyModelForecast <- forecast (MyModel, h=12) Since my last observation was on december 31st, 2016 I expected my forecast date to start on

d <- structure(list(Site = structure(c(8L, 12L, 7L, 6L, 11L, 5L, 10L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 9L, 8L, 12L, 7L, 6L, 11L, 5L, 10L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 9L, 8L, 12L, 7L, 6L, 11L, 5L, 10L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 9L, 8L, 12L, 7L, 6L, 11L, 5L, 10L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 9L, 8L, 12L, 7L, 6L, 11L, 5L, 10L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 9L, 8L, 12L, 7L, 6L, 11L, 5L, 10L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 9L, 8L, 12L, 7L, 6L, 11L, 5L, 10L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 9L,

I think the subject says it all. I want to make a simple lattice plot, using xyplot with the argument type=c("l","a"). The problem then is that in the resulting plot it is difficult/impossible to see which plot corresponds to the average and which to the individual profiles. I triedthings like extra arguments lwd=c(1,3) or col=c("blue","red") hoping

Folks, I have a strange situation where: library(MatchIt) f <- function(d) { m <- matchit(treatment ~ lsales + major.industry, data=d, method="nearest", discard="hull.treat") treatmentfirms <- match.data(m, group="treat") list(m=m, treatmentfirms=treatmentfirms) } res <- f(ex) does not work at the match.data() call,

I am trying to plot the following data using dotchart intersect.data<-structure(list(X = structure(c(1L, 3L, 8L, 9L, 10L, 11L, 12L, 13L, 14L, 15L, 2L, 4L, 5L, 6L, 7L), .Label = c("1-100", "1001-1100", "101-200", "1101-1200", "1201-1300", "1301-1400", "1401-1500", "201-300", "301-400", "401-500",

Hi, I am trying to plot the following data so that it can be visually represented well. I tried the dotchart but I felt it was too spread out. Then I tried the barplot which is good enough for me. Is there a way to give the labels for the y-axis as in the dot chart? Also, I feel the grey level is confusing, so is there options for designs within the bars? I cannot use color as the journal wants

Hi all, I have the following data and I have a histogram for mms like ggplot(hist,aes(x=hist$mms))+ geom_histogram(binwidth=1,fill="white",color="black")and then I want to fill the color of histogram by probable=1 and probable=0, could anyone help me in this? My data: structure(list(probable = c(1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 0L, 1L, 1L,

I can't get my simultaneous equations to work using system fit. Please help. #Reproducible script Empdata<- read.csv("/Users/ngwinuiazenui/Documents/UPLOADemp.csv") View(Empdata) str(Empdata) Empdata$gnipc<-as.numeric(Empdata$gnipc) install.packages("systemfit") library("systemfit") pdata <- plm.data(Empdata,

I'm creating a lattice barchart based off a pretty complicated data structure. The barchart comes out quite nice ( thanks to lattice ) but the problem is that the horizontal axis comes out all scrunched because the barchart doesn't know that the intervals of Var.1 are really "associated" with the conditioning variable Var.2. Therefore, all the intervals of Var.1 are put on

Dear all I encountered strange behaviour of augPred with virtually the same data First I made groupedData object. > mar.g<-groupedData(rutilizace~doba|int, data=mar) When I perform nlme on complete dataset I get an error with augPred > fit<-nlsList(rutilizace~SSasymp(doba, Asym, R0, lrc), data=mar.g) Warning message: c("1 error caught in nls(y ~ cbind(1 - exp(-exp(lrc) * x),

Better posted on r-sig-mixed-models , no? Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkeley Breathed in his "Bloom County" comic strip ) On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 5:17 AM, PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> wrote: > Dear all > > I encountered strange

HI everyone, I try to get some bootstrap CIs for coefficients obtained by quantile regression. I have influencial values and thus switched to quantreg.. The data is clustered and within clusters the variance of my DV = 0.. Is this sensible for the below data? And what about the warnings? Thanks in advance for any guidance, Kay > dput(d) structure(list(Porenfläche = c(4990L, 7002L, 7558L,

Hi Well, yes I tried it about two weeks ago but my post did not get through as it still awaits moderator approval. I could check which column is offending but actually it is only minor nuisance, I can live with selection of columns before fitting a model. What seems to me strange is that both full dataset and only selected colums gave me identical fit results but only one works within augPred.