similar to: Passing lists and R memory usage growth

I have a Dell server with four bonded, gigabit interfaces. Bonding mode is 802.3ad, xmit_hash_policy=layer3+4. When testing this setup with iperf, I never get more than a total of about 3Gbps throughput. Is there anything to tweak to get better throughput? Or am I running into other limits (e.g. was reading about tcp retransmit limits for mode 0). The iperf test was run with iperf -s on the

Hi, I'm using R to collect data for a number of exchanges through a socket connection and constantly running into memory problems even though task I believe is not that memory consuming. I guess there is a miscommunication between R and WinXP about freeing up memory. So this is the code: for (x in 1:length(exchanges.to.get)) { tickers<-sqlQuery(channel,paste("SELECT Symbol

Hello list, I have two differents installation Xen Hypervisor on two identical physical server, on the same switch : The problem is on my new server (Xen 4.0.1 with pvops kernel 2.6.32.24), I have bad performance on bandwidth I have test with a files copy and "iperf". Result iperf average: Transfert Bandwidth XEN-A -> Windows

We tried to migrate from old Windows fileserver (p4, single HDD) to Samba (FedoraCore15, Samba 3.5.12-72.fc15, ext4 volume, xeon, raid5). Our pipeline is so, that some special software generates files on that fileserver. The typical filesize ~50 mbytes. On the old hardware, software (win2k3 server) the time of single file creation was about 10 seconds. On the new configuration it takes 20-25

I did some testing using samba-3.0.0 as a server and two identical clients one Running W2K and other running Win XP pro. If I write a big file using the W2K client, I'm getting about 25 Mbytes/sec but if I run the same testing using the Win XP Pro, this client only is able to get 12.5 Mbytes/sec. There is a problem between XP and samba?

Need your expertise for the theoretical approach to deduce the p-values for the level, trend and seasonality parameters. I wonder if there's source code available. Thanks group. Kel

I appear to be seeing the performance of a local ZFS file system degrading over a short period of time. My system configuration: 32 bit Athlon 1800+ CPU 1 Gbyte of RAM Solaris 10 U6 SunOS filer 5.10 Generic_137138-09 i86pc i386 i86pc 2x250 GByte Western Digital WD2500JB IDE hard drives 1 zfs pool (striped with the two drives, 449 GBytes total) 1 hard drive has

Hello, I'm testing a two nodes glusterfs distributed cluster (version 3.3.1-1) on Debian 7. The two nodes write on the same iscsi volume on a SAN. When I try to write an 1G file with dd, I have the following results : NFS : 107 Mbytes/s Gluster client : 8 Mbytes/sec My /etc/fstab on the client : /etc/glusterfs/cms.vol /data/cms glusterfs defaults 0 0 I'd like to use the gluster

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1315 Bug ID: 1315 Summary: Does not seem to be a way to use a named quota to make decisions in a rule Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Hi, I am seeing a performance degradation while using libvirt to start my vm (kvm). vm is fedora 12 and host is also fedora 12, both with 2.6.32.10-90.fc12.i686. Here are the statistics from iperf : >From VM: [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 199 MBytes 55.7 Mbits/sec >From host : [ 3] 0.0-30.0 sec 331 MBytes 92.6 Mbits/sec libvirt command as seen from ps output : /usr/bin/qemu-kvm -S -M

Hi all, I'm confused of small files (no bigger than 50k ) transfers speed through samba,which is very slow on my machine. Bellow is a real case, -- SuSE professional 9.2, kernel 2.6.11,Samba 3.0.14a,reiserfs -- Dual AMD Opteron,4G mem,Giga byte LAN -- 2 raid 5 make up of 16 SATA hard disks -- set readhead to 1024 I tested raids speed using bonnie++ and get 450 Mbytes/s at 16GB files

Having built libtheora-1.0alpha3, I tried it out on a 46 second long, 161 MByte raw dv format video clip. First, I copied these lines from ogg-theora-microhowto.html <snip> mplayer -ao pcm -aofile stream.wav -vo null file_to_be_encoded.avi & mplayer -vo yuv4mpeg -ao null -nosound file_to_be_encoded.avi & encoder_example -v 1 -a 1 stream.wav stream.yuv > theora_file.ogg

Hi, I am trying to minimize a rather complex function of 5 parameters with gafit and nlm. Besides some problems with both optimization algorithms (with respect to consistantly generating similar results), I tried to run this optimization about a hundred times for yet two other parameters. Unfortunately, as the log below shows, during that batch process R starts to eat up all my RAM,

Apparently the b89 xvm-src.tar.bz2 tar bz2 archive is corrupted / truncated on the b89 source download page: http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b89/ http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/b89/xvm-src.tar.bz2 In the past, the xvm-src.tar.bz2 file had a size of ~ 100 mbytes; with b89 the size of the downloadable archive is only 72 mbytes. And bzip2 complains: % bzip2 -tv

I'm relaying an icecast1 mp3 stream with icecast2. This works fine, and the song title is displayed correctly no matter if I use <relay-shoutcast-metadata>1</> or not on the relay. But, the stream name and other metadata provided by ices0 on the icecast1 server is not displayed in the listening client. Icecast1 source: [Id: 1] [Sock: 11] [Time of connect: 09/Aug/2004:10:01:24]

Jack Moffitt <jack@xiph.org> writes: > Now I see the problem. This will not cause anything to show up. You > have no sources. Eh? -> sources Listing sources [Id: 509] [Sock: 14] [Time of connect: 18/Feb/2002:20:55:14] [IP: 205.147.43.110] [State: 1] [Type: pulling relay] [Proto: x-audiocast] [Clients: 2] [Dumpfile/fd: (null)/-1] [Priority: 0] [Song Title: ] [Song URL:

If I try to rsync OpenOffice-directory (OO as an example, 155 MBytes) to Solaris8-machine/rsync-server it takes 4-5 minutes, about 70 MBytes gets transfered and eventually rsync.exe/winXP "dies"; actually winXP's net doesn't responde anymore and I have to boot whole machine! But when I try to do same between Linux and Solaris everything works fine, transfer speed is about

Hi I was wondering if you ever got better performance out of your Gigabit/IDE/Fc2? I am facing a similar situation. I am running FC2 with Samba 3.x My problem lies in not that I am limited to 10 MBytes per second sustained. I think it's related to this pdflush and how it's buffers are setup. (I have been doing some research and before 2.6 kernels bdflush was the method that was used and

Hi all, I am trying to get some decent speed out of a vanilla Debian (Proxmox) box and am running out of ideas. Basically I can exchange data at 110MB/sec (raw, nfs, ftp) but not with Samba shares. I tried almost every samba tuning tip I could find to no avail. The only optimisation left to smb.conf at the moment is debug level = 0. As one can see the robocopy throughput is merely half of what

A number of years back it became necessary to limit the size of messages that could be posted to the samba mailing list. The current limit is 64 KBytes. While it continues be be desirable to block large spam messages, I believe it is time to ask current subscribers for their preferences. This list is here to serve the wishes and needs of our subscribers. We wonder if the time is right to review