similar to: Fw: (no subject)

I have no idea to be honest. I have never used the package, I simply did a search for it. Hopefully a more experienced user can help --- On Sun, 7/12/09, maram salem <marammagdysalem at yahoo.com> wrote: > From: maram salem <marammagdysalem at yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [R] (no subject) > To: "John Kane" <jrkrideau at yahoo.ca> > Received: Sunday, July 12,

Hi all, I'm trying to load the quantreg package but keep running into problems no matter which method I have tried. Does anybody know what this error (below) means in plain language and what I might do to get this installed. I have not had problems downloading/installing/running packages in the past. thanks in advance, derek Begin R output: trying URL

Hi All: I tried to download and install "quantreg" (a package for doing quantile regression) from CRAN. When I ran install.packages ("quantreg") within an R session, I got the following error message: <----Beginning of error message ---> * Installing *source* package 'quantreg' ... ** libs g77 -mieee-fp -fPIC -O2 -g -pipe -march=i386 -mcpu=i686 -c akj.f

Hi, I'm wondering if it is possible to install a package for R 2.0 on R 1.9.1 on Mac OS X? I'm getting this error which seems to be known issue: library("quantreg") Error in firstlib(which.lib.loc, package) : couldn't find function "lazyLoad" In addition: Warning message: package quantreg was built under R version 2.0.1 Error in

Does any have installation instructions for this? When I run install.packages('quantreg') I get: gcc -std=gnu99 -shared -o quantreg.so akj.o boot.o brute.o chlfct.o cholesky.o combos.o crq.o crqfnb.o dsel05.o etime.o extract.o idmin.o iswap.o kuantile.o mcmb.o penalty.o powell.o rls.o rq0.o rq1.o rqbr.o rqfn.o rqfnb.o rqfnc.o sparskit2.o srqfn.o srqfnc.o srtpai.o -llapack -lblas

Dear R list, I have a function specifying my log-likelihood, and now I need to set the constraint that *alpha > kappa*, could anyone help me with setting this in my function? the function is defined as follows: mll <- function(param){ n <- length(x) psi <- numeric(n) psi[1] <- 1.0 a0 <- exp(param[1]); a1 <-exp(param[2]); b1 <- exp(param[3]); *alpha *<-

Hello, Consider MCMC sampling with metropolis / metropolis hastings proposals and a density function with a given valid parameter space. How are MCMC proposals performed if the parameter could be located at the very extreme of the parameter space, or even 'beyond that' ? Example to express it and my very nontechnical 'beyond that': The von Mises distribution is a circular

Hello, When evaluating different learning methods for a categorization problem with the (really useful!) caret package, I'm getting confusing results from the Kappa computation. The data is about 20,000 rows and a few dozen columns, and the categories are quite asymmetrical, 4.1% in one category and 95.9% in the other. When I train a ctree model as: model <- train(dat.dts,

Hi, im little bit confused about Cohen's Kappa and i should be look into the Kappa function code. Is the easy formula really wrong? kappa=agreement-chance/(1-chance) many thanks christian ############################################################################### true-negativ:7445 false-positive:3410 false-negativ:347 true-positiv:772 classification-aggrement:68,6%

Greetings, I am a bit confused by the results returned by the functions: cohen.kappa {concord} classAgreement {e1071} when using a two-way table. for example, if I have an matrix A, and a similar matrix B (same dimensions), then: matrix A and B can be found: http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/drupal/files/a_40.txt http://casoilresource.lawr.ucdavis.edu/drupal/files/b_40.txt A <-

Hi all, I have a list of 20000 data, and the list look like below. I wonder what is the simplest way to extract 'kappa' value (or 'xi' or 'alpha' for the matter) from each of the data. How can I simply code it without having to change the list to a dataframe first? Many thanks! $X19997 xi alpha kappa 784.7718640 165.4065141 -0.2709599 $X19998

Dear R-devel: The Cluster administrators at KU got enthusiastic about testing R-3.2.2 with Intel MKL when I asked for some BLAS integration. Below I forward a performance report, which is encouraging, and thought you would like to know the numbers. Appears to my untrained eye there are some extraordinary speedups on Cholesky decomposition, determinants, and matrix inversion. They had

Dear list, I'm migrating a project from Matlab to R, and I'm facing a relatively complicated problem for nls. My objective function is below: >> objFun <- function(yEx,xEx,tEx,gamma,theta,kappa){ yTh <- pdfDY(xEx,tEx,gamma,theta,kappa) sum(log(yEx/yTh)^2) } The equation is yTh=P(xEx,tEx) + noise. I collect my data in: >> data <-

Hello, I?m looking for a way to measure the goodness of fit of my model with Cohen?s Kappa (scaling between 0 and 1). The kappa function does not give the results I?m looking for. Heres the code: z<-glm(x~y,binomial) kappa(z, exact = T) Does anyone know more? many thanks Christian -- _______________________________________________ Search for businesses by name, location, or phone number.

Dear R-users I need to calibrate kappa, rho, eta, theta, v0 in the following code, see below. However when I run it, I get: y <- function(kappahat, rhohat, etahat, thetahat, v0hat) {sum(difference(k, t, S0, X, r, implvol, q, kappahat, rhohat, etahat, thetahat, v0hat)^2)} > nlminb(start=list(kappa, rho, eta, theta, v0), objective = y, lower =lb, > upper =ub) Error in dots[[1L]][[1L]] :

Hi, R guys: I'm using L-BFGS-B method of optim for minimization problem. My function called besselI function which need non-negative parameter and the besselI will overflow if the parameter is too large. So I set the constraint box which is reasonable for my problem. But the point outside the box was test, and I got error. My program and the error follows. This program depends on CircStats

Dear all, I have a question on Cohen's kappa: Assume I have two datasets, one has 500 objects, 10 methods and the other, 1000 different objects, 20 different methods. Could I compare between the two datasets to conclude the 10 methods are more "concordant" than the 20 ones by looking at some output, for example, cohen.kappa{concord} ? One more, could anyone explain in brief,

I am a novice user of "R" and I'm learning with R version 2.8.1, using WinEdt_1.8.1, under Widows Vista Home Version. ## The test function below, from a vector input, returns vector values: # and it contains an "ifelse"statement TEST<- function(x) { low<- -x^2 up<- x^4 ifelse(x>=0,up,low ) } u<- seq(-1,1,0.5) TEST(u)

Hi, I've noticed I get different results fitting a function to some data on my laptop to when I do it on my computer at work. Here's a code snippet of what I do: ##------------------------------------------------------------------ require(circular) ## for Bessel function I.0 ## Data: dd <- c(0.9975948929787, 0.9093316197395, 0.7838819026947, 0.9096108675003, 0.8901804089546,

Hi All, I am using fleiss kappa for inter rater agreement. Are there any know issues with Fleiss kappa calculation in R? Even when I supply mock data with total agreement among the raters I do not get a kappa value of 1. instead I am getting negative values. I am using the irr package version 0.70 Any help is much appreciated. Thanks and Regards M [[alternative HTML version deleted]]