similar to: help! Error in using Boosting...

Hi I am using boosting for a classification and prediction problem. For some reason it is giving me an outcome that doesn't fall between 0 and 1 for the predictions. I have tried type="response" but it made no difference. Can anyone see what I am doing wrong? Screen output shown below: > boost.model <- gbm(as.factor(train$simNuance) ~ ., # formula +

I recently use gbm for a binary classification problem. As expected, it gets very good results, based on Area under ROC with 7-fold cross validation. However, the application (malware detection) is cost-sensitive, getting a FP (classify a clean sample as a dirty one) is much worse than getting a FN (miss a dirty sample). I would like to tune the gbm model biased to very low FP rate. For this

HI, Dear Greg, I AM A NEW to GBM package. Can boosting decision tree be implemented in 'gbm' package? Or 'gbm' can only be used for regression? IF can, DO I need to combine the rpart and gbm command? Thanks so much! -- Sincerely, Changbin -- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi R User, I was trying to find a final model in the following example by using the Boosted regression trees (GBM). The program gives the fitted values but I wanted to calculate the fitted value by hand to understand in depth. Would you give moe some hints on what is the final model for this example? Thanks KG ------- The following script I used #----------------------- library(dismo)

Dear R users, I’m trying to understand how correlated predictors impact the Relative Importance measure in Stochastic Boosting Trees (J. Friedman). As Friedman described “ …with single decision trees (referring to Brieman’s CART algorithm), the relative importance measure is augmented by a strategy involving surrogate splits intended to uncover the masking of influential variables by others

Hi I am using boosting for a classification and prediction problem. For some reason it is giving me an outcome that doesn't fall between 0 and 1 for the predictions. I have tried type="response" but it made no difference. Can anyone see what I am doing wrong? Screen output shown below: > boost.model <- gbm(as.factor(train$simNuance) ~ ., # formula +

Dear All, I am far from being a guru about parallel programming. Most of the time, I rely or randomForest for data mining large datasets. I would like to give a try also to the gradient boosted methods in GBM, but I have a need for parallelization. I normally rely on gbm.fit for speed reasons, and I usually call it this way gbm_model <- gbm.fit(trainRF,prices_train, offset = NULL, misc =

I am trying to call a C++ k-means function within R and I am struggling. I know that the below code is used to call a C++ function for gbm but how do I do it for k-means? gbm.obj <- .Call("gbm", Y=as.double(y), Offset=as.double(offset), X=as.double(x), X.order=as.integer(x.order),

On page 409 of "Applied Predictive Modeling" by Max Kuhn, it states that the gbm function can accomodate only two class problems when referring to the distribution parameter. >From gbm help re: the distribution parameter: Currently available options are "gaussian" (squared error), "laplace" (absolute loss), "tdist" (t-distribution

Hello LIST, I'd like to use tune from e1071 to do a grid search for hyperparameter values in gbm. However, I can not get this to work. I note that there is no wrapper for gbm but that it is possible to use non-wrapped functions (like lm) without problem. Here's a snippet of code to illustrate. > data(mtcars) obj <- >

Hi, I am having problems passing arguments to method="gbm" using the train() function. I would like to train gbm using the laplace distribution or the quantile distribution. here is the code I used and the error: gbm.test <- train(x.enet, y.matrix[,7], method="gbm", distribution=list(name="quantile",alpha=0.5), verbose=FALSE,

Good afternoon Has anyone tried using Dr. Elith's BRT script? I cannot seem to run gbm.step from the installed gbm package. Is it something external to gbm? When I run the script itself <- gbm.step(data=model.data, gbm.x = colx:coly, gbm.y = colz, family = "bernoulli", tree.complexity = 5, learning.rate = 0.01, bag.fraction = 0.5) ... I

Full_Name: The Manager Version: 2.0.1 OS: Solaris 9 Submission from: (NULL) (129.67.80.243) > install.packages("gbm") trying URL `http://cran.uk.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES' Content type `text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1' length 52975 bytes opened URL ================================================== downloaded 51Kb trying URL

Hi all, Could anybody tell me what happened to my logistic regression in R? mylog=glm(mytraindata$V1 ~ ., data=mytraindata, family=binomial("logit")) It generated the following error message: Error in model.frame.default(Terms, newdata, na.action = na.action, xlev = object$xlevels) : factor 'state1' has new level(s) AP Thank you!

Gracias Carlos, mi idea es construir un cono, un cilindro u otros cuerpos geométrico y luego graficarlos. Alguna idea de como empezar? Muchas gracias como siempre El lun., 19 de feb. de 2018 15:06, <r-help-es-request en r-project.org> escribió: > Envíe los mensajes para la lista R-help-es a > r-help-es en r-project.org > > Para subscribirse o anular su subscripción a

Hola de nuevo. Se me olvidaba la principal razón para utilizar gbm.step del paquete dismo. Como sabéis, los boosted si sobreajustan (a diferencia de los random forest o cualquier otro bootstrap) pero gbm.step hace validación cruzada para determinar el nº óptimo de árboles y evitarlo. Es fundamental. La opción que me queda, Carlos, es hacerlo con gbm, pero muchas veces, y usar el

Hi all, I've got the following error message in using e1071 svm routine... Could anybody please help me? Thank you! --------------------------------- model <- svm(y=factor(mytraindata[, 1]), x=mytraindata[, -1], probability=T) Error in if (any(co)) { : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed In addition: Warning message: In FUN(newX[, i], ...) : NAs introduced by coercion

Gracias Carlos. Hasta donde yo entiendo si las hay: El argumento family puede ser: "gaussian" (for minimizing squared error); por lo que tiene que ser numérica "bernoulli" (logistic regression for 0-1 out-comes); binaria por narices "poisson" (count outcomes; requires the response to be a positive integer); numérica también, pues. La única podría ser

Hi all, I have a large data set and want to immediately build a 'blind' model without first examining the data. Now it appears in the data there are a lot of fields that are constant or all missing values - which prevents the model from being built. Can someone point me the right direction as to how I can automatically purge my data file of these useless fields. Thanks in advance, pdb

I'm attempting to fit boosted regression trees to a censored response using IPCW weighting. I've implemented this through two libraries, mboost and gbm, which I believe should yield models that would perform comparably. This, however, is not the case - mboost performs much better. This seems odd. This issue is meaningful since the output of this regression needs to be implemented in a