similar to: Passing arguments to with()

Hi all, In the good old llvmc, the -Wo flag could be used to pass arguments to the optimizer. Is there a similar mechanism anywhere for clang? Is there also a similar mechanism to -Wllc? Thanks! Harel Cain -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120304/0e5c7267/attachment.html>

Thanks, but I'm not sure I understand. I see no such flag in clang 2.9 nor couldn't I find any mention of it. What does it do? Harel Cain On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 15:03, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>wrote: > > In the good old llvmc, the -Wo flag could be used to pass arguments to > the > > optimizer. Is there a similar mechanism anywhere for clang?

Hi, Could anyone tell me what is wrong: > length(unique(mydata$myvariable)) [1] 2 > and in t-test: (...) Error in t.test.formula(othervariable ~ myvariable, mydata) : grouping factor must have exactly 2 levels > I re-checked the code and still don't get what is wrong. Moreover, there is some strange behavior: /1 It seems that the error is vulnerable to NA'a, because it

I have tried to invoke a transformation/optimization pass using -mllvm, without success. I might be missing something. For example I have a shared/dynamic library which contains LLVM passes. I used to invoke them with llvmc like this: >>*llvmc mycode.c -o mycode.o -c -opt -Wo,=-load,libFoo.dylib,-Foo* Can this style of optimization be executed using -mllvm argument? Thx, PMon On Sun,

> In the good old llvmc, the -Wo flag could be used to pass arguments to the > optimizer. Is there a similar mechanism anywhere for clang? Is there also a > similar mechanism to -Wllc? -mlvm will handle all of them -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

On 03/04/2012 02:32 PM, Harel Cain wrote: > Thanks, but I'm not sure I understand. I see no such flag in clang 2.9 > nor couldn't I find any mention of it. What does it do? It's called -mllvm. You can use it like this. clang -mllvm -vectorize ... Cheers Tobi

Dear userRs, Is there a way to explicitly set an argument to a function call as missing? E.g., histogram(foo, bar, endpoints=ifelse(!missing(limits),limits,NA/NULL/whatever))) In this call I want to set a value to the endpoints argument only if the `limits' variable has been set, and leave the defaults otherwise. The only way I could do it is thus: if

Hi, when reporting http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5104 I spent quite a while trying to figure out what passes are used by "-O1" so that I could give this list to bugpoint. It turns out -debug-pass=Arguments is mentioned in docs/HowToSubmitABug.html but under a chapter titled "Compile-time optimization bugs" which I naively ignored since my bug was not a compile-time

Hi, Thanks to Timo and Christian for their answers. On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 3:32 AM Timo Kilpilehto <timo at kilpilehto.fi> wrote: > eval sh -c "echo none of this makes any difference" Where is it documented that ssh is going to eval my command? The fact remains that ssh does not transparently pass the command to the remote host. This pair of commands result in the same

Hello > For example I have a shared/dynamic library which contains LLVM passes. I > used to invoke them with llvmc like this: >>>llvmc mycode.c -o mycode.o -c -opt -Wo,=-load,libFoo.dylib,-Foo > Can this style of optimization be executed using -mllvm argument? No. You cannot add additional passes this way, only pass 'ordinary' arguments. -- With best regards, Anton

Hello, i have following problems using dovecot-antispam plugin (Dovecot >1.1.3, FreeBSD 8.0-Current, dovecot-antispam 1.0/1.1) dovecot-antispam compiled using dspam-exec/mailtrain, with/wo debugging (i've tried all possibilities) When i try to move message to SPAM folder (using dspam-exec backend) i'm getting IMAP error: antispam signature not found and in dovecot logs: Nov 23 23:44:24

Hi all, actually I got a problem with the namespaces in dovecot 1.1 beta11. It occured after purging index files and resynch via imapsync. Dovecot complains about "Unknown namespace", though it worked with versions before. I cannot comfirm for 1.1beta10, but I surely know 1.1beta9 worked with these settings. Example: From Folder [INBOX/Trash] To Folder [___________] To Folder

Hi, I am wondering if the --print-xml option is working correctly. The output for two snapshot-create commands are the same, even though the first one includes additional options (no-metadata and atomic). I want to use the generated XML to create a snapshot via a perl script, and Sys::Virt only seems to support snapshots using a XML description of the arguments. timos@cerberus:~$ sudo virsh

Quoting Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>: Dear staff, I am using the ds-aa to pass mysqld. I compile mysqld 4.0.12 statically (compile all libraries statically to the executable) and got the bc file, named it as mysqld.bc3. I use the command to pass: opt -load <poolalloc install dir>/lib/libLLVMDataStructure.so -ds-aa mysqld.bc3 -print-alias-sets -disable-output

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:36 PM, <hc2428 at columbia.edu> wrote: > Quoting Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>: > > Dear staff, >     I am using the ds-aa to pass mysqld. I compile mysqld 4.0.12 > statically (compile all libraries statically to the executable) and > got the bc file, named it as mysqld.bc3. >     I use the command to pass: > > opt -load

Quoting hc2428 at columbia.edu: Dear staff, Here is the bc file. Heming > Quoting Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>: > > Dear staff, > I am using the ds-aa to pass mysqld. I compile mysqld 4.0.12 > statically (compile all libraries statically to the executable) and > got the bc file, named it as mysqld.bc3. > I use the command to pass: > > opt

Hi R users, I am trying to use the optim function to maximize a likelihood funciton, and I got the following warning messages. Could anyone explain to me what messege 31 means exactly? Is it a cause for concern? Since the value of convergence turns out to be zero, it means that the converging is successful, right? So can I assume that the parameter estimates generated thereafter are reliable MLE

I thought the LLVM IR is target independent and that "llvm-gcc -c -emit-llvm -O2" produces target independent code. I'm working on a back-end and use llvm-gcc to first generate the bc file. Afterwards I use llc including the new back-end to produce the assembler file. -Timo -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at

Hi, there I am a grad student struggling to get my syntax right in a model I am building in R. I am trying to specify a variable,W, in a loop, such that on the first iteration, it is equal to Wo, my starting value, which I have already specified with Wo<-9.2 On any other iteration other than the first, I want W to equal the previous value of W in the iteration. plus an increment from

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Stripf, Timo<Timo.Stripf at itiv.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote: > On little endian machines the code works correct but on big endian %lhsv > must be compared against 73 << 8. If llvm-gcc thinks it's compiling for a little-endian target, the optimizers will assume the target is little-endian... what are you trying to do? -Eli