llvm dev - Mar 2012 - [LLVMdev] Passing arguments to opt via clang

I have tried to invoke a transformation/optimization pass using -mllvm,
without success. I might be missing something.

For example I have a shared/dynamic library which contains LLVM passes. I
used to invoke them with llvmc like this:
>>*llvmc mycode.c -o mycode.o -c -opt -Wo,=-load,libFoo.dylib,-Foo*
Can this style of optimization be executed using -mllvm argument?

Thx,
PMon


On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es>
wrote:
> On 03/04/2012 02:32 PM, Harel Cain wrote:
> > Thanks, but I'm not sure I understand. I see no such flag in clang
2.9
> > nor couldn't I find any mention of it. What does it do?
>
> It's called -mllvm.
>
> You can use it like this.
>
> clang -mllvm -vectorize ...
>
> Cheers
> Tobi
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120304/4480a4f2/attachment.html>

Hello
> For example I have a shared/dynamic library which contains LLVM passes. I
> used to invoke them with llvmc like this:
>>>llvmc mycode.c -o mycode.o -c -opt -Wo,=-load,libFoo.dylib,-Foo
> Can this style of optimization be executed using -mllvm argument?
No. You cannot add additional passes this way, only pass 'ordinary'
arguments.

-- 
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

what is the solution to pass opt arguments , non ordinary  passes like :
*-std-link-opts* by clang ? 
Dose clang invoke opt in normal compilation procedure even?



--
View this message in context:
http://llvm.1065342.n5.nabble.com/Passing-arguments-to-opt-via-clang-tp3161p58920.html
Sent from the LLVM - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.