similar to: nlsList {nlme} - control arguments problem

Hi Rick Thanks to Dieter Menne I did manage to solve the problem of imposing bounds on the parameter space duirng an nlsList fit. He suggested using optim to optimize the parameters prior to each fit. This worked well for me as I had a customized selfStart function that then optimized the parameters for each individual separately. if you rewrote your selfStart function as: powrDpltInit <-

I am not certain how nlme works so I followed an example from the web ( http://www.menne-biomed.de/gastempt/gastempt1.html). I was able to successfully reproduce the example. However, when I modified my the example to use my data and with my formula, I get a set of errors having to do with the log() function. I get 10 of them (all exactly the same) and there are 10 levels in my factor variable.

Following on my posting of this morning, concerning a problem that I am having constructing a self-starting function for use with nls (and eventually with nlsList and nlme), the following is the self-starting function called NRhyperbola: > NRhyperbola function (Irr,theta,Am,alpha,Rd) { # Am is the maximum gross photosynthetic rate # Rd is the dark resiration rate (positive value) #

Dear listers, I am trying to fit a model using nlsList() using alternately a SSfol() selfstart function or its developped equivalent formulae. This preliminary trial works well mydata<-groupedData(Conc~Tps|Organ,data=mydata) mymod1<-nls(Conc~SSfol(Dose,Tps,lKe,lKa,lCl),data=mydata) as well as a developped form: mymod2<-nls(Conc~Dose * exp(lKe+lKa-lCl) *

Hi All I'm analysing growth rates using a gompertz (logistic) curve and am attempting to fit parameters for all of my study birds using nlsList. I've been looking for an option in nlsList to set min and max limits for parameter values during estimation, although I have failed to find any under 'control'. Other users seem to have reported that using control in the port algorithm

Hi All. I'm trying to run nlsList an getting an error that makes no sense to me. I have accuracy and reaction time data over many trials for each person (id) When I use nlsList code that is virtually identical to the example in the doc file I get the following error. I've tried everything I could think of and can't get around it. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? **************

Dear R-helpers, I'm using R 2.5.0 under Windows and am trying to use nlsList from nlme 3.1-80 with the selfstart function for the four parametric logistic function. My first test went well, but now I'm trying to do some more sophisticated things and it does not work anymore. I simulate my data from a five parametric logistic function like this:

DeaR I am trying to use a dynamically create formula with nlsList and nlme, but I cannot get the environment of the string-generated formal to work similarly to the manually entered one. Any idea? Dieter #----- library(nlme) # Pinheiro/Bates p 280 fm1Indom.lis = nlsList(conc~SSbiexp(time,A1,lrc1,A2,lrc2), data=Indometh) nlme(fm1Indom.lis,random=pdDiag(A1+lrc1+A2~1)) # works... # Simulating

I hope that the mailing list is the correct forum for the question below. I have trouble calling functions nlsList and nlme from another function. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Jens Praestgaard Human Genome Sciences Rockville MD. I have a data set v with two components, v$mixeddat and v$init. They are listed below: > v$mixeddat conc result rep sample z 11 20.00000000

Hello, I'm having problems creating and using a selfStart model with nlme. Briefly, I've defined the model, a selfStart object, and then combined them to make a selfStart.default model. If I apply getInitial to the selfStart model, I get results. However, if I try usint it with nls or nlsList, these routines complain about a lack of initial conditions. If someone could point out

Hello together, Is there a tool to test the statistical differences between parameter estimates of a nlsList fit? I fitted degradation data using the nlsList method and want to find out whether derived rate constants are significantly different from each other at the grouping factors soil and temperature. Regards Frank Scherr

Howdee, I am able to fit a 4-parameter logistic growth curve to a dataset which comprise many individuals (using R v. 2.3.1). Yet, if I want to obtain the parameters for each individual (i.e., for each 'id') using nlsList, then I obtain an Error message which I have trouble interpreting. Any advice as to how I can solve this problem? Thanks for your time, Marc > reg <-nls(mass ~

Hi list, In the object returned by summary.nlsList, what's the difference between "coefficients" and "parameters"? The have the same "Estimate", different se (therefore t value), but same p values. R.2.8.0 on winxp with nlme_3.1-89 Thanks, ...Tao +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > library(nlme) > fm1 <- nlsList(uptake ~

Hello, nls-users, is it possible to pass additional parameters to the model function that are known and groupwise constant with nlsList? I could not find something like a "keep this fixed" option in the documentation and the code (my fault...?) The current workaround is to break the problem down into groups and use globals to pass the constant parameters, but it is ugly code and

Hello all. I was wondering if the logLike.nls() and logLike.nlme() functions are still being used. Neither function seems to be available in the most recent release of R (1.9.1). The following is contained in the help file for logLik(): "classes which already have methods for this function include: 'glm', 'lm', 'nls' and 'gls', 'lme' and others in

Dear R users, Does anybody have a function to calculate logLik or AIC for nlsList objects? After receiving error messages, another user helped me ascertain that this function is not currently written into R. Many thanks Lindsay

Dear all, is there a way to extract the individual variance-covariance matrix of the parameter estimates of the i-th individual using nlsList ? Thanks a lot Peter -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the

Hi I am using nlsList from the nlme package to estimate group specific coefficient sets to get a first impression of the structure of coefficients in relation to potential predictor variables. In some cases I got coefficients in other there are conversion problems due to bad start values I guess, resulting in typical error messages as known from nls: Error in nls(formula = formula, data = data,

I was looking at how the model.frame method for lm works and comparing it to my own for coxph. The big difference is that I try to retain xlevels and predvars information for a new model frame, and lm does not. I use a call to model.frame in predict.coxph, which is why I went that route, but never noted the difference till now (preparing for my course in Nashville). Could someone shed light

Someone just sent me a data set that causes the lmekin function, part of the kinship package, to fail. In chasing it down I get an error I have never seen before. fit <- lmekin(icam1 ~ factor(center) + age + factor(sex), random= ~1|iid, data=chaidata, varlist=kmat) Error in Y - fitted : non-numeric argument to binary operator Add the recover option, and the offending lines are