similar to: Invoking Rails from an API

Struggled a whole day, but still could not get DCOM working on my machine. What I did is: 1. Installed R 2.8.1 under folder "../R/R-2.8.1" 2. Installed R_Scilab_DCOM3.0-1B5 under folder ".. \R\(D)COM Server" 3. Installed packages: rscproxy_1.0-12, RExcelInstaller_3.0-10, rcom_2.0-4... 4. run the following commands: library(rscproxy) library(rcom)

Hello People, Has anybody been succesful at implementing winbind on solaris, if so could u please tell what modification have to be done to pam.conf. I have samba 2.2.3a on solaris 8. I have come to the point where wbinfo -u returns succesfully with the domain users and wbinfo -g returns the domain groups. However getent passwd does not return anything other than the /etc/passwd entries. Anil

Full_Name: Venkatesh Mysore Version: R-1.7.0 OS: WindowsXP Submission from: (NULL) (216.165.110.10) While accessing Rproxy.dll repeatedly (using the code from the (D)COM example in the R website) causes a failure in the 24th iteration. R-1.6.2 does NOT give this error. This seems to be a memory management error, that might be linked to the huge leakage difference between R-1.7.0 and R-1.6.2

Hi, I am currently experimenting on rake freeze_gems and there is something I do not understand. When I freeze_gems my app, it puts Rails in the /vendor/ directory, which works. But what about all other gems I have installed (for example Unicode, sqlite support, mysql support and so on)? The aim of freezing is to be independant of the versions of the ISP, but it seems that the server still

Hello People, We are in the process of migrating our file server from a win2k box to a red hat box running samba 2.2.3a. We have winbind running on the redhat box and it has joined the windows domain and "genent" shows all the domain users.We know have to move the files from the win2k box to linux box and maintain the file ownership info. It would be great if anyone can point me to

I''ve been reading, hearing, and looking at blogs that state Ruby on Rails is rather slow. Coming from a VB 6 world (thank you Microsoft for killing VB because VB.NET is NOT VB) I was always told that VB was a toy or too slow. Now, I''ll easily tell you that yes VB was not a great language. It had it''s share of warts, like a lot of other languages I might add, but

I''ve been developing new application on local machine in rails 1.1.1. Hosting provider (godaddy) is at rails 1.0.0 and not upgrading any time soon I''m told. I set "RAILS_GEM_VERSION = ''1.0.0''" in my environment.rb file to get past inital errors, but now I''m getting the following error:

I see that lighttpd 1.3.14 supports SCGI. lighttpd 1.3.14 - 2005-06-15 18:10 Changes ------- * added SCGI support via mod_scgi * added hash-based and round-robin load balancing to mod_proxy * fixed range requests larger than 2Gb * fixed compilation on Solaris * fixed endless loops in mod_fastcgi, mod_cgi and mod_proxy * fixed handling of URIs for ''+'' and

Hello all- Forgive me if this has been discussed before- I searched the archives and didn''t see anything. Anyway, here it goes- There is a lot of talk lately about Comet-based applications- that is, web apps that hold connections to the server open for a very long time, to effectively achieve realtime data push from the server to the browser. Currently, there are a few web

Hey so, People are asking about Mongrel Ruby 1.9 compatibility. Isn''t the point of 1.9 for library developers to have time to get ready for 2.0? It''s not like 1.9 is a production release. Evan -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC

Hello Guys, I''m reviewing the code for 1.9, and forgot about this when we first spoke on this subject. The current way we stop threads is using Thread#raise to spread StopServer exception, which will not work as expected in 1.9. 1.9 will treat raised exceptions as #kill, like JRuby does, so the worker threads will not finish serving the client and _then_ exiting, but will be

Hi all, I''ve upgraded my system to Rails 1.1.1 successfully. After much looking I haven''t found out how to migrate an existing application to a new rails version though. What is the procedure, if any, for upgrading the application I''ve developed in 1.0? Is there a script I need to run? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Does a rails project automatically switch to using a "local" copy of the rails libs if it exists in the vendor directory, or do I need to tweak something else to pick it up? Thanks! -Theo

I''m having problems trying to freeze local rails gem to my app with: rake freeze_gems On OSX 10.4.6 i get the following error: Illformed requirement [=#<Gem::Specification name=rails version=1.1.0>] This is the full output: Freezing to the gems for Rails 1.1.0 rm -rf vendor/rails mkdir -p vendor/rails cd vendor/rails Unpacked gem: ''activesupport-1.3.0'' mv

Updated today, got Typo 2.6.0 broken with Rails 1.1 (Ruby 1.8.4) -- WEBrick does not start. Is there any workaround except "svn co" with Typo trunk? -- Yaroslav Markin yaroslav at markin dot net

Hi all- I just decided to move from my 1.1.0 to 1.1.2. I had previously frozen to 1.1.0 and therefore had all of rails in SVN in my vendor directory. When I finally got rake freeze_gems to work, it blasted (rm -rf) my vendor/rails directory and put a new one in there. This also blasted all my .svn directories. Is there some convenient way to do a freeze upgrade and play well with SVN?

Hello, I''m working on a rails 1.1 app on my mac, but my web host hasn''t upgraded from 1.0 to 1.1 yet, so the below code, which works on my machine, doesn''t work on the web server: # controller def compare_fields name = params[:person][:name] @exists = Album.count(["name like :n", {:n => name}]) render :update do |page| if @exists > 0

After a long processing, I was able to create a version of a small C# class that was able to emulate the rproxy by P/Invoke. This is mostly to find a workaround a performance problem of the StatConnector. It's almost work but ... I have strange memory exception when I call the print function. The variable seems to not survive from one call to the other. As there is no debug symbol for

Hi Michael, thanks for trying out LLVM! "The bad news comes with the make test-all results. Less than two minutes into the comprehensive test suite the LLVM-GCC version of Ruby 1.9 dies with the following message: "Illegal instruction (core dumped)". Later it tells me the test failed with "error 132". This is, as you can see, not a very useful message since it's not

I have been comparing R with other languages and systems. One peculiar feature of R is there is no scalar. Instead, it is just a vector of length one. I wondered how much performance penalty this deign cause, particular in situations with many scalars in a program. Thanks. Jason Liao, http://www.geocities.com/jg_liao Associate Professor of Biostatistics Drexel University School of Public