similar to: negation in grep

I am looking for an R package with which one can calculate an effect size for a set of contrasts given an omnibus chi-square test statistic (more than 1 degree of freedom). Is there such a package? Presumably, it would implement the procedure (or something like it) described by Roznow and Rosenthal 1996 Psychological Methods 1: 331-340. many thanks! Steven Orzack Fresh Pond Research Institute

On Jul 24, 2013 2:52 AM, "Jacob Carlborg" <doob at me.com> wrote: > > Do your LLVM development on Mac OS X :) Should work well. Apple is one of the bigger supporters of LLVM, so I'd hope OS X would be a suitable dev platform. > It depends on what your needs are. Using VirtualBox will probably be the easiest. It also allows you to run both Mac OS X and Ubuntu

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote: > On 2012-06-15 07:25, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> Figured it was good to ask this as James is busy making sure the Clang >> doxygen is actually all well formed, and reasonably linked together so >> we have proper docs for the ever growing number of Clang library users... >> >> There are

Consider an analysis of covariance involving age and cohort. The goal is to assess whether the influence of cohort depends upon the age. The simplest case involves data as follows value Age Cohort x1 ????? 1?????? 3 x2?????? 1?????? 4 x3?????? 1?????? 5 x4 ????? 2 ????? 3 x5 ????? 2 ????? 4 x6 ????? 2 ????? 5 etc. Age is a factor. The numeric response variable is value and Cohort is a

I'm using lmer to fit mixed-effect logistic regression models. This is for a small data set. First, I fit a constant: Generalized linear mixed model fit using Laplace Formula: propm ~ (1 | study) Data: inducedSR71507.dat Family: binomial(logit link) AIC BIC logLik deviance 183.7 189.4 -89.84 179.7 Random effects: Groups Name Variance Std.Dev. study (Intercept)

I have a question about stepAIC and extractAIC and why they can produce different answers. Here's a stepAIC result (slightly edited - I removed the warning about noninteger #successes): stepAIC(glm(formula = (Morbid_70_79/Present_70_79) ~ 1 + Cohort + Cohort2, family = binomial, data = ghs_70_79, subset = ghs_70_full),direction = c("backward")) Start: AIC=3151.41

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:21 AM, James Dennett <james.dennett at gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Jacob Carlborg <doob at me.com> wrote: > > On 2012-06-15 07:25, Chandler Carruth wrote: > >> Figured it was good to ask this as James is busy making sure the Clang > >> doxygen is actually all well formed, and reasonably linked together so

Hi: So I have a library function called fooo() in a source file B.c and an external A.c file that is referencing a function fooo() in it. foo is returning a pointer to a structure A.ll: %struct._bar= type { %struct._foo, i32, i32 (%struct.doo*, %struct.doo*, %struct.doo*)* } declare i8* @fooo() #2 B.ll: %struct._bar= type { %struct._foo, i32, i32 (%struct.doo*, %struct.doo*, %struct.doo*)* }

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:28:38 -0300 > francis picabia via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < > > samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Well, no it

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 3:48 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Well, no it isn't actually on that page, you need to follow an > hyperlink to this page: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Idmap_config_rid > > It is really confusing. rid or tdb. I don't know what it wants because the second link has both. Here is the

I was wondering if anyone could help me with this one. I am having trouble getting LDAP and samba working properly on my Debian Woody box. I am using OpenLDAP 2.0.27-3 and the unsable packaged Samba version 2.999+3.0 and am using the samba.schema for my LDAP database. Whenever I try to join the network using either W2K or smbclient the LDAP debug log shows that the following filter is being

I've read there can be issues with /tmp so I switched the test to /var/tmp One file (foo.txt) is made by the shell user, while the other file (doo.txt) is made by the same user connected over Samba. bash-3.2$ ls -n doo.txt -rwxr--r-- 1 3000 3004 29 Jul 4 09:51 doo.txt bash-3.2$ ls -n foo.txt -rw-rw---- 1 61001 10 39 Jul 4 09:50 foo.txt With -l they both seem

On 2013-07-24 09:47, Tyler Hardin wrote: > Not much slower. VBox does an amazing job at getting near native > performance on modern machines (those with nested paging etc.). This is > definitely the best option if your computer has ~2g ram and 2+ cores. > Give the Ubuntu VM 2g and 1 (maybe 2) core/s and it should be fine. At work, it takes significantly longer to boot our Ruby on

Hello, I'm not sure how to go about this. Suppose I have a function SEXP boo(SEXP x){ //do something } Also, I have an executable which embeds R in itself. I would like to provide a R function to user code to call that calls 'boo' e.g ##user supplied expression that is given to me x<-1 boo(x) One way is to create a library with function boo that performs .Call to boo, but is

I tryed te baloon out a domu and get: xm balloon VS01 1 Command balloon is deprecated But i need it... What can i doo? Dom0: Debian Etch - Kernel 2.6.18-6-xen-686 DomU: Debian Etch - 2.6.18-6-xen-vserver-686 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Thank You David and Mats for the reply, The reason I need to know that main is the entry point is as follows : I have a dead code elimination pass that removes the function call for boo. boo was initially called from the main function , but since the return in the main function has no dependency on boo, boo function call is removed. Now I want to remove the function definition of the functions

Hi, I'm able to create a library with R CMD INSTALL cmd, etc... I'm just wondering.. is it possible that when the user says library(boo), it runs some initialization code? I have a dumb R file that is: print(2) boo <- function(x){} when I R CMD INSTALL the library, I'm able to see 2 in my unix console.. but when I do library(boo) in R afterwards.. I don't see

Hi, My understanding of a "dead" register is a def that is never used. However, when I dump the MI after reg alloc on a simple program I see the following sequence: ADJCALLSTACKDOWN64 0, 0, 0, *implicit-def dead %rsp*, implicit-def dead %eflags, implicit-def dead %ssp, implicit %rsp, implicit %ssp CALL64pcrel32 @foo, <regmask %bh %bl %bp %bpl %bx %ebp %ebx %rbp %rbx %r12 %r13 %r14

If you want to know which functions are (or may be) called from where, in the entire program, then you will need to do some sort of "LLVM-IR Linking" (there are tools that will do that for you, such as "llvm-link"). Of course, even then, there's possible cases where it's impossible to know whether a function is ACTUALLY called until at runtime - function pointers,

Hi, let's say I have this A = matrix(c(1, 2, 4), nrow=1) colnames(A)=c("YOO1", "YOO2", "YOO3") # ie # YOO1 YOO2 YOO3 #[1,] 1 2 4 HELLO <- NULL HELLO$YOO1="BOO" HELLO$YOO2="BOO" HELLO$YOO3="HOO" and I want a matrix that will sum my categorization.. how can I do it efficiently without any loop? #ie BOO HOO