similar to: Formula parsing and updating

could someone explain why the name of FPVAL gets " .value" concatenated onto it when the code below is run and temp is returned. I've been trying to figure this out for too long. It doesn't matter when I put the FPVAL in the return statement. It happens regardless of whether it's first or last. Thanks. f.lmmultenhanced <- function(response, pred1, pred2) {

The following example gives output with a line length of 103 on my system. It is causing a nuisance in creating a vignette. Is there something other than e.g., options(width=60) I need to set? The Sweave FAQ suggests this should work. options(width=60) pastured <- data.frame( time=c(9, 14, 21, 28, 42, 57, 63, 70, 79), yield= c(8.93, 10.8, 18.59, 22.33, 39.35, 56.11, 61.73, 64.62,

Thank you very much for the example. I think interactively I could get something. But my obstacle is to write an R script that processes my set of data automatically. My difficulty is to extract the information that appears on the screen, when R is operated interactively, from a scripts. Let me go over some steps to make sure I am doing things right. Assume my data have been read into the matrix

Hi Saurav! On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Pathak, Saurav<s.pathak08 at imperial.ac.uk> wrote: > I am new to R, I have to do a 2 step Heckman model, my selection equation is > below which I was successful in running but I am unable to proceed further, > > > > I have so far used the following command > > glm(formula = s ~ age + gender + gemedu + gemhinc + es_gdppc +

Hello. I am making a program that allows a user to enter a formula to be used in coxph() and then does some other stuff to it, and also allows the user to set other options within coxph(). What is the proper way to pass a formula to a function along with a ...? I have a function: func <- function(coxformula, data = parent.frame(),...) { # Cut to relevant part of function coxmod <-