similar to: Confidence limits for the parameter of the Poisson distribution

When --blocksize <val> is provided, qemu command line would add physical_block_size=<val>,physical_logical_size=<val> to -device directive. Example: qemu-kvm \ -drive file=raw.img,cache=writeback,id=hd0,if=none \ -device scsi-hd,drive=hd0,physical_block_size=4096,logical_block_size=4096 \ Signed-off-by: Tuan Hoang <tmhoang@linux.ibm.com> --- fish/fish.c |

I was in chapter 5 of the Ruby on Rails, and I come across "Asset pipeline" when R-o-R detect and jam all css and js files into one. It''s true that Browser will have to make less requests, but at the same time, the browser will potentially have to process more code than it should? For example, I use a slider jquery plugin in gallery page, since R-o-R fuse the plugin with

Add a new launch command for direct backend, which allows specifying the blocksize to the disks. The name is `launch_blocksize`, accompanied alias is `run-blocksize`. Example: $ guestfish --listen -a raw.img $ guestfish --remote -- launch_blocksize 4096 The actual qemu command is: [...] -device virtio-scsi-ccw,id=scsi -drive file=raw.img,cache=writeback,id=hd0,if=none -device

Hi all, I''m a new comer. I want to design website myself but i don''t know any thing about coding before. Please advise me to learn which programming language ! I''m very interested on Ruby and Ruby on Rails introduction ... Thank you so much ! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Allow `launch` call to accept an optional argument, called `blocksize`. Example: $ guestfish --listen -a raw.img $ guestfish --remote -- launch blocksize:4096 The actual qemu command is: [...] -device virtio-scsi-ccw,id=scsi -drive file=raw.img,cache=writeback,id=hd0,if=none -device scsi-hd,drive=hd0,physical_block_size=4096,logical_block_size=4096 [...] Signed-off-by: Tuan Hoang

Hola, Estoy intentando averiguar cómo contar el número de categorías situadas después de ciertos valores. Por ejemplo, en el siguiente vector: x <- c(3, "A", "B", 5, "A", 4, 5, "A", "A", 3) el resultado que quisiera obtener es: Valor -> Resultado 3 -> 1 A y 1 B 4 -> 0 A y 0 B 5 -> 3 A y 0 B ¿Alguien tiene alguna

Hello, I have to compute a multiple summation (not an integration because the independent variables a are discrete) for all the values of a function of several variables f (x_1,...,x_n), that is sum ... sum f(x_1,...,x_n) x_1 x_n have you some suggestion? Is it possible? I know that for multiple integration there is the function adapt, but it has at most n=20. In my case n depends on the

Does this give correct results for special floats (0, infs)? We tried to improve (for single floats) x86 rcp in llvmpipe with newton-raphson, but unfortunately not being able to give correct results for these two cases (without even more additional code) meant it got all disabled in the end (you can still see that code in the driver) since the problems are at least as bad as those due to bad

>>>>> jing hua zhao >>>>> on Mon, 24 Jun 2019 08:51:43 +0000 writes: > Hi All, > Thanks for all your comments which allows me to appreciate more of these in Python and R. > I just came across the matrixStats package, > ## EXAMPLE #1 > lx <- c(1000.01, 1000.02) > y0 <- log(sum(exp(lx))) > print(y0) ## Inf

Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Untested beyond compiling a few shaders to see if they look like they might work. nvdisasm agrees with envydis's decoding of these things. Will definitely get ahold of a G200 to run tests on before pushing this. .../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_emit_nv50.cpp | 94 ++++++++++++++++++---

Hi Hadley, Thanks for the counterpoint. Response below. On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 1:59 PM Hadley Wickham <h.wickham at gmail.com> wrote: > The existing behaviour seems inutitive to me. I would consider these > invariants for n vector x_i's each with size m: > > * nrow(rbind(x_1, x_2, ..., x_n)) equals n > Personally, no I wouldn't. I would consider m==0 a degenerate

Mhm I see now, thanks for your explanation! Son Tuan Vu On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 10:58 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Son Tuan VU <sontuan.vu119 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Vedant, > > Thank you for your reply. I think I can make this debugify-each mode, but > I guess this is reserved for your GSoC project ? > >

> On Mar 16, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Son Tuan VU <sontuan.vu119 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Vedant, > > Thank you for your reply. I think I can make this debugify-each mode, but I guess this is reserved for your GSoC project ? No, there's no reserved work. If you'd like to work on this I encourage you to do so. There's plenty of other work slated for the GSoC project.

Hi, For my work, I want to use LLVM to compile SPEC 2k for Alpha. Since Alpha support has been dropped, I tried using version 2.8, but it is quite buggy, probably because the Alpha backend has not been maintained. I was wondering if there is an earlier version where the Alpha backend is stable enough to compile SPEC 2k? For my purpose, I do not need the most advanced optimizations, so an

Hi Vedant, Thanks for your reply. More comments inline. Son Tuan Vu On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > Hi, > > + Chandler, who has a lot more experience with our pass managers. > > On Apr 20, 2018, at 12:56 PM, Son Tuan VU <sontuan.vu119 at gmail.com> wrote: > > + Vedant: what do you think about the last point, since

Hi Vedant, Thank you for your reply. I think I can make this debugify-each mode, but I guess this is reserved for your GSoC project ? However, if I understand correctly, we do not want to take the output of the first check-debugify (I mean the .ll file with potentially all the WARNINGs and ERRORs after the first pass) as input for the second debugify. What we need is to take the fresh output of

Hello, Has anyone taken a look at this bug? I really want to fix this, but as Paul pointed out, this requires a lot of care... Thank you for your help Son Tuan Vu On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Son Tuan VU <sontuan.vu119 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you all for taking a look at this. I pasted the C source then > deleted it because I was afraid that it was too long to read...

At one time (version 1.7), the code below used to work for converting and extracting based on the Date Time. In version 1.8.1, something changed I know, but I cannot for the life of me figure out what... Data: UserName,RequestDate,PO,OrderDate,ExpDelivDate,Vendor,Total "Woody, Jim",12/19/2002,AP15063,1/7/2003,2/10/2003,Ames ,8570 "Harrold,

Hello all, I came across the code of Verifier, and see that it doesn't modify the IR at all. Why it is not considered as an analysis pass? Actually, this will have impact on debugify-each and print-before/after-all: we are not supposed to print/debugify Verifier pass, but since Verifier is declared as a transformation (well, a non-analysis) pass, we actually do print/debugify it. Thanks for

Hi, This is most likely only a minor technicality, but I saw the following: On page 6 of the 'parallel' vignette (http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-devel/library/parallel/doc/parallel.pdf), the random-number generator "L'Ecuyer-CMRG" is said to have seed "(x_n, x_{n-1}, x_{n-2}, y_n, y_{n-1}, y_{n-2})". However, in L'Ecuyer et al. (2002), the seed is given with