similar to: group sequential analysis - stopping for futility

I beg your pardon if this is too off topic. I am posting here since I hope to find an R solution to my problem. Please indulge me while I give a little background about what I'm trying to do. I'm on a DSMB for a clinical trial. The Steering Committee for the trial has asked us to perform a futility analysis on their primary outcome which is a time-to-event endpoint. The trial was not

Hello Everyone,   I’m a SAS user who has recently become interested in sequential clinical trials designs. I’ve discovered that the SAS based approaches for these designs are either too costly or are “experimental.” So now I’m looking for alternative software. Two programs that seem promising are SPLUS Seqtrial and R.   I recently obtained a 30 day trial for the SPLUS Seqtrial add-on and have

The referenced patch calls set_vq_affinity without checking if the op is valid. This patch adds the check. Fixes: 3dad56823b53 ("virtio-vdpa: Support interrupt affinity spreading mechanism") Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal at nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea at nvidia.com> --- drivers/virtio/virtio_vdpa.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1

On 2023-05-04 a.m.9:50, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > The referenced patch calls set_vq_affinity without checking if the op is > valid. This patch adds the check. > > Fixes: 3dad56823b53 ("virtio-vdpa: Support interrupt affinity spreading mechanism") > Reviewed-by: Gal Pressman <gal at nvidia.com>

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91779 Bug ID: 91779 Summary: MacBookPro3,1 (NV84) fails to load nouveau on linux 4.1 -- Invalid ROM contents Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

Well I now have a 4.0 server at a solid checkpoint. Before I start the chore of setting up SAMBA and LDAP. Part of the delay was I did not copy all of the needed DNS files, and I have to reerad the BIND book. So I want to be able to get to this point again easily. I did not note down what options I had selected during install. Is there some way in the install log to figure that out? Is

Does dovecot support shared folders, maildir style? I've set it up, using the maildirmake from debian maildrop to create folders. I have a number of as-yet unresolved issues, so I haven't been able to test with many clients. It's interesting that dovecot manages to present folders as siblings (rather than children) of INBOX. But mutt, at least, doesn't seem to see the shared

On Thu, 2023-05-04 at 13:08 -0400, Feng Liu wrote: > > > On 2023-05-04 a.m.9:50, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > > > > The referenced patch calls set_vq_affinity without checking if the op is > > valid. This patch adds the check. > > > > Fixes: 3dad56823b53 ("virtio-vdpa: Support

On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 01:08:54PM -0400, Feng Liu wrote: > > > On 2023-05-04 a.m.9:50, Dragos Tatulea wrote: > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > > > > The referenced patch calls set_vq_affinity without checking if the op is > > valid. This patch adds the check. > > > > Fixes: 3dad56823b53 ("virtio-vdpa:

I've installed 6.4 on an old T30 ThinkPad, and I'm in the midst of setting it up. I can't seem to get an rpm of Pan for it, nor even to do yum update. Mousing around fedoraproject eventually got me to http:// rpmfusion.org/Configuration/ and from there to downloads for the free, nonfree, and epel packages (along with a caveat that tells you -- *after* you've gotten rpmfusion

This patch series is based on Eugenio's fix for handling CVQs in a different ASID [0]. The first patch is the actual fix. The next 2 patches are fixing a possible issue that I found while implementing patch 1. The patches are ordered like this for clarity. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230112142218.725622-1-eperezma at redhat.com/ Dragos Tatulea (1): vdpa/mlx5: Fix

This patch series is based on Eugenio's fix for handling CVQs in a different ASID [0]. The first patch is the actual fix. The next 2 patches are fixing a possible issue that I found while implementing patch 1. The patches are ordered like this for clarity. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230112142218.725622-1-eperezma at redhat.com/ Dragos Tatulea (1): vdpa/mlx5: Fix

>> Oh I don't doubt the basics, red book is red book and bits are >> identically replicable and re rippable bits. > > I don't see any problem with taking innovation as far as is practical > and saying "it's finished, no more updates". Sure, basics :) Again, I'm meaning in regard to about bugs, docs, porting and nits. > If I want to do freedb

Dear R Users, I have a couple of proto objects like: wedge <- proto(expr={ start.year <- 2008 end.year <- 2050 }) star.rating <- wedge$proto( star = c(4, 5, 8, 10), gain = c(0, .3, .5, .7), cost = c(0, 2100, 4000, 7500), star.rating <- function(., year) 6.0, setup = function(.){ .$cost.for.star <- approxfun(.$star,

This question is vaguely related to R in that I have managed to wedge the netbook computer that I use for demonstrations of R and I would like to know how to un-wedge it so I can continue to give lectures about R. I have an ASUS eee PC running the netbook-remix version of Ubuntu 9.10. The X server in 9.10 is a little different from earlier versions in that it does not require an explicit

Hello, While exploring if rgl is along the lines of what I need, I checked out demo("rgl") and didn't find quite what I'm looking for, and am therefore seeking additional help/suggestions. The application is geared towards displaying a 3D rendering of a contaminant plume in the subsurface with the following highlights: Once the plume was rendered as a 3D object, a

When setting up my new machine, I had the surprise to see that "Package 'fUtilities' was removed from the CRAN repository." This is problematic for my work. I use many of its functions, and it will complicate things a lot if other programmers want to use my previous code in the future. Plus, nowhere can I find the justification for its removal. Thanks for any info on this

Dear all! I'm using R 2.12.1 in Ubuntu 10.04. Problem is that when using functions like interp (package akima) and akimaInterp (package fUtilities), I get different results every time for the same data set. I've checked the interpolated results, and two examples (in attachment) have different sum of NA values. Also when I subtract the x,y,z values from two interpolations of the same data

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91804 Bug ID: 91804 Summary: nouveau kernel drive should not steal fb until after getting vbios Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component:

Dear expeRts, What's a 'good' (nice-looking, easy-to-read) setup for the LaTeX package 'listings' to display R code? The two versions below are partly inspired by the settings of the package SweaveListingUtils and http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/R-How-to-format-R-code-in-LaTex-documents-td816055.html Any suggestions, comments, or improvements are welcome. Cheers, Marius ###