similar to: Acts_as_authenticated

Hello Doug, I am not disputing anything you say and in fact, spring-rich is "okay" as far as swing development goes. But rails principles adheres to those which we hold near and dear such as "don''t repeat yourself" (note: spring-rich model, glazed lists model, jgoodies models) and "convention over configuration (note: xml config files). Let''s get away

Whereabouts would I want to put a Ruby file that extends a Rails class? Say, adding a method to ActiveRecord::Base or something along those lines. I''ve read that those classes go in /lib, but my application doesn''t seem to see the changes I''ve made. Obviously I''m missing something... Any suggestions would be appreciated! -Brasten

Hi, Has anyone successfully run A3 Mania on Wine? It is an MMORPG (http://www.a3mania.com). I have installed directX and some other things using winetricks. I wias getting errors with urlmon.dll and rpcrt4.dll and then a dump. I copied over the urlmon.dll and rpcrt4.dll files from my windows installation to the system32 folder of wine. My current dump is as follows. What should i do to fix

What is the hex number after the method, e.g. +0x32f below? It matches arg0 and I suspect it''s the c++ "this" pointer, aka hidden first argument. I would like to confirm, though. Thanks, Joel --- XUL`PresShell::ProcessReflowCommands(int)+0x32f XUL`PresShell::FlushPendingNotifications(mozFlushType) +0x19e

Hi everyone, I was playing around with xul + prototype, and everything seemed to be going well until I ran into a wall - there seems to be some problem I can''t explain with Function.prototype.bind, for instance when I run this code: try { new Ajax.Request("http://localhost:3000/search/hello", { onComplete: this.onHelloComplete.bind(this) }); } catch

Hi Folks, Just a quick message saying that, after much demand, I wrote a quick write-up for the RoR + XUL thing I did yesterday: http://www.zedshaw.com/blog/programming/ruby_xul.html It lays out the few simple things I did, has a bit of rant on an unrelated topic, and other stuff but it''s short still. On a related note, I''d like to thank "xal" on IRC for reminding

Dear All, I am faced with this problem: Firefox version is 17.0.6 before and after the update I ran an update today; bash-4.1# yum history Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit, security ID | Login user | Date and time | Action(s) | Altered ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 296 | james <james>

Hi all! I usually keep the panels on my Centos 6.6 (Gnome) so they auto-hide, but t'other day I wanted to keep the top panel visible for a while to make the clock visible for doing some rough timings. so I open the top panel, click properties, and UNcheck the "autohide" checkbox, close the properties menu, and to my surprise, the panel still autohides. Went thru that exercise

On 01/09/2015 06:07 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote: > I'm still trying to find the > thing I used back in C5(?) that raised the panels when the mouse hovered > over it for X seconds. With C6 I can't find it anymore and it switches > way too fast. I presume you're talking about panels with "Autohide" set. If you have the GUI gconf-editor installed, it's under

There should be no semantic difference between linkonce_odr and weak_odr, except that weak_odr is non-discardable. Why doesn't the autohide optimization work just as well on weak_odr + unnamed_addr as linkonce_odr + unnamed_addr? On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Steven Wu via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I recently found that thinLTO doesn't deal

Hi, I recently found that thinLTO doesn't deal with globals that has linkonce_odr and unnamed_addr (for macho at least) because it prohibits the autohide optimization during link time. In LLVM, we tagged a global linkonce_odr and unnamed_addr to indicate to the linker can hide them from symbol table if they were picked (aka, linkonce_odr_auto_hide linkage). It is very commonly used for some

when trying to install .net framework 3.0 i get: brewergeek at brewergeek-laptop:~$ rm -rf .wine brewergeek at brewergeek-laptop:~$ wine dotnetfx3setup.exe wine: created the configuration directory '/home/brewergeek/.wine' fixme:system:SetProcessDPIAware stub! fixme:dwmapi:DwmIsCompositionEnabled 0x33cf94 fixme:file:MoveFileWithProgressW MOVEFILE_WRITE_THROUGH unimplemented

Dear Friends, I started integrating XUL into Rails, however, I have some problems. The first problem is that I can open local XUL files with Firefox, but cannot open them through Rails/Webrick, Firefox says it does not recognize what it is. I''ve read the cookbookxul experiment and I know I have to play around with content-type, but a contoller action like def run_xul

That is a good question and I don't know. The optimization is defined include/llvm/Analysis/ObjectUtils.h. If I enable that for weak_odr + unnamed_addr, no tests are failing so I guess it is a safe optimization? :) It is probably because the autohide optimization is targeted at c++ templates and inline functions and we know they have linkonce_odr linkage, which suggests whoever uses this

I know CentOS don't have inside info on what Redhat may or may not do in the future - plus Redhat don't usually announce publicly what their future plans are - but on the off-chance that someone on this list may know: Does anyone know what Redhat are likely to do with the next major release of Firefox on RHEL (and hence CentOS) ? The reason I ask, is that RHEL has been supplying the

Hi, We are thinking about choosing Rails as our weapon of choice for our next project, which is basically a text editor on steroids, whith some functionality that need an Internet connection. In the first step we are going to develop it as a plain web app (AJAX-ified, yay!), however, in the next step we would like to port some of the functionality (such as the editor) to a desktop app (which can

Hi people, As I stated in a earlier message, I am using Rails on my masters degree and soon I will have to port my application from a relational database (MySql) to a RDF semantic database called Sesame. At first, I thought that I could get away with most of the porting only by writing a decent database adapter, but then, examining AR closer, I could see that it has some strong dependencies

>From looking at the code, it seems like LLVM is basically opting MachO into -fvisibility-inlines-hidden all the time, i.e. if the function is linkonce, it's discardable, so mark it hidden to pretend the compiler inlined it and discarded it. However, this isn't conforming, because the addresses of inline functions will no longer compare equal across DSOs. Realistically, nobody cares

This patch makes windows zoom in and out of a zero point on create/unmap. I've cleaned up the formatting/style to be consistent with the rest of compiz (eg adding spaces around operators, tabifying, using C style comments). This patch could use some more work. It should only apply to decorated toplevels, but right now it also affects XUL menus (I guess because they are not unmanaged like

Hi, I''ve started reading some Java books. Gasp! What makes website development with Java so bad? I haven''t looked at Struts but I''m reading about Hibernate. Compared to ActiveRecord, Hibernate seems like some extra typing to explicitly define the model fields, getters and setters. I know that these are things that you can do in ActiveRecord when things get complicated